I already experience it on p2pb2b exchanger, very bad at all (especially for new tokens). In the past, tokens were always listed in forkdelta or etherdelta, okex too, and they were all okay. but now, most dev bounty teams always slam into exchangers who don't have good liquidity and end up with no value at all.
p2p is the worst thing that ever exist in the crypto ecosystem. fork and etherdelta only operated when there was a real buyer and seller while p2p was fully operated with the bot that created so many fake buy and sell orders. 
Topic: A Very Important Advice for Devs (Read 744 times)
I already experience it on p2pb2b exchanger, very bad at all (especially for new tokens). In the past, tokens were always listed in forkdelta or etherdelta, okex too, and they were all okay. but now, most dev bounty teams always slam into exchangers who don't have good liquidity and end up with no value at all.
p2p is the worst thing that ever exist in the crypto ecosystem. fork and etherdelta only operated when there was a real buyer and seller while p2p was fully operated with the bot that created so many fake buy and sell orders.
Let's stop Warning devs about bad exchanges because I belief they are fully aware of successful projects that use exchanges like binance or okex to raise fund using IEO, if any project dev still goes for p2pb2b or small exchanges it means they have other plans
You have provided a lot of important information through it.I was surprised myself.Many good project scammers have been recognized.I myself have traded on 3/4 of the exchanges from here.Many people can use the boot system here which is really very frustrating for traders.
Devs need to understand the difference between good and bad exchanges but it's unbelievable that they don't know, I put myself in the same shoe thinking that if I work on a new project and I have the desire to make it a popular one won't I do some good research first? I think most developers willingly use those bad exchanges for selfish interest
This is so true! If we do something, we always want our product to be the best. There is no reason for devs to choose such a bad exchange to list their token. That's just unreasonable. Even for us, an investor, we still do really careful researches before doing anything. It's just unbelievable when devs team choose a bad exchange just because they don't do enough research. Those coins listed on bad exchange are more likely to be a scammed one! 
I would agree with the OP's list, but still, Hotbit can be a solid exchange when it comes to liquidity, but people have been raising red flags about it for a long time, so it would probably be the best idea to completely avoid it, agree. On the other hand, for small unknown projects its almost mission impossible to get listed even on some mid-tier exchanges like Bittrex, Kucoin etc., so listing on previously mentioned shady/low liquidity exchanges is their only way to put their tokens on the market.
If project is firstly listed on the exchange from this list when its dead project
Devs need to understand the difference between good and bad exchanges but it's unbelievable that they don't know, I put myself in the same shoe thinking that if I work on a new project and I have the desire to make it a popular one won't I do some good research first? I think most developers willingly use those bad exchanges for selfish interest
Bad projects that's have no good future ends on bad exchange just like what OP said and I believe it, many who list their tokens on small exchanges plan to take advantage on investors and run away with their money and put the blame on either bounty hunters or the exchange
I already experience it on p2pb2b exchanger, very bad at all (especially for new tokens). In the past, tokens were always listed in forkdelta or etherdelta, okex too, and they were all okay. but now, most dev bounty teams always slam into exchangers who don't have good liquidity and end up with no value at all.
If any dev list their coin on those exchange you mentioned then don't blame us even when the price of that coin rally or pump. Anything that comes from a bad and shady exchange will be met with doubtful eyes. If you want a nice community with lot of trust around your coin, stay away from shady exchanges with fake trading volume.
In this case, investors and crypto enthusiasts are getting smarter so they are more careful in investing. Especially in IEO. The importance of choosing a trusted exchange with a good reputation is very important for the sustainability of the project. Choosing shitexchange is a blunder, it will only make investor confidence disappear. Preferably, this is really well-considered, strategizing with products to the maximum, establishing cooperation with a more profitable exchange, yes Probit is good enough in this case, or it could also be with Kucoin, it will definitely get bigger market attention.
I have heard many complain about these exchanges but as I always tell people before you do anything always check and ensure its all we. You can't be investing where you know investors are not there or where you know there are lots of issues arising. If your project is good publicity and marketing will help you get good investors but I will also say people should careful check if it's true or not. Do your own research.
If any dev list their coin on those exchange you mentioned then don't blame us even when the price of that coin rally or pump. Anything that comes from a bad and shady exchange will be met with doubtful eyes. If you want a nice community with lot of trust around your coin, stay away from shady exchanges with fake trading volume.
What would those developers do who are not having any ICO for their coin and are doing everything on their own, they aren't able to pay such high listing fees for the top exchanges and that's the reason that they apply for those exchanges and when they get enough of the funds then they can apply for the bigger exchanges, but the big problem here is how to differentiate between those developers who are actually willing to work and make that token a success and those who are in it just for the sake of profits.
If any dev list their coin on those exchange you mentioned then don't blame us even when the price of that coin rally or pump. Anything that comes from a bad and shady exchange will be met with doubtful eyes. If you want a nice community with lot of trust around your coin, stay away from shady exchanges with fake trading volume.
Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place
I just heard that for first time. its really baffling if the advisors that supposed to bring to project into a success by giving meaningful advice turns out they are the one that gives such a bad advice. those low tier exchange although cheap not really worth it because they not only make supposedly success project to their demise but stain their reputation forever.because p2pb2b is the worst exchange, all IEO projects there always have low value
Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place
I just heard that for first time. its really baffling if the advisors that supposed to bring to project into a success by giving meaningful advice turns out they are the one that gives such a bad advice. those low tier exchange although cheap not really worth it because they not only make supposedly success project to their demise but stain their reputation forever.Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place
if you know some advisors from a project sometimes they receive payments or bribes to make this project successful and cover up the ugliness of the ongoing project, maybe you can avoid the project with an advisory system like that.I know that swimming.is.a.very good for.sensual. So, guess it.is time for them.to.level.a.good besides no, foe.noe.but having enh..PUNISHMENT do you take.some.thime also to bet in yhe futr.Let us be that conservative and reoirce full relation to.blockain ro.
Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place
if you know some advisors from a project sometimes they receive payments or bribes to make this project successful and cover up the ugliness of the ongoing project, maybe you can avoid the project with an advisory system like that. 
Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place
I just heard that for first time. its really baffling if the advisors that supposed to bring to project into a success by giving meaningful advice turns out they are the one that gives such a bad advice. those low tier exchange although cheap not really worth it because they not only make supposedly success project to their demise but stain their reputation forever.
Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place
I just heard that for first time. its really baffling if the advisors that supposed to bring to project into a success by giving meaningful advice turns out they are the one that gives such a bad advice. those low tier exchange although cheap not really worth it because they not only make supposedly success project to their demise but stain their reputation forever. Jump to: