Anyone notice how when the info pushes SC supporters into a corner they turn a deaf ear? Just look at this thread and see how often FlipPro chooses not to respond.
Topic: A warning about Solidcoin for newer users [UPDATED] - page 2. (Read 4058 times)
I support all cryptographic currency's. We should of had at-least 10 by now all with their different traits, ideology's, rules, and protections, and let them duke it all out in a totally free market. That is my dream, it's a shame however that people are on here wasting time flaming each-other instead of working development of new currency's...
Really?
Coinhunter is one of the biggest promoters of flaming and falsehoods.
But if you want to help, great! Maybe you can bend CH's ear and get him to support this as well.
The SolidCoin community can start by publicly denouncing CH's "Bitcoin to Collapse" propaganda. You know, the lie he paid bounties for people to spread.
I'm waiting
I think I am more of a Bitcoin supporter than 90% of the people in this thread. Please...
You hide it well.
That's not all I am doing that is Bitcoin related at the moment, I have several projects I am working on, with the latest one I just finished called http://bitcoincloset.com . I am a die-hard Bitcoin supported, and I can assure you that the majority of people in this thread have done way less for Bitcoin than I have...
I think I am more of a Bitcoin supporter than 90% of the people in this thread. Please...
You support a decentralized currency?
Kinda hard to tell.
Just sayin.
I think I am more of a Bitcoin supporter than 90% of the people in this thread. Please...
You hide it well.
I think I am more of a Bitcoin supporter than 90% of the people in this thread. Please...
You support a decentralized currency?
Kinda hard to tell.
Just sayin.
Even after he has touted how great solidcoin is and safe and secure it is?
That is BS. You are starting to believe your own misinformation as well as his.
Yes funny as hell these fools still think they are going to get rich with their wagon hitched to that idiots train.
It might be preferable that they continue to support Solidcoin, lest they be mistaken by others for Bitcoin supporters.
Even after he has touted how great solidcoin is and safe and secure it is?
That is BS. You are starting to believe your own misinformation as well as his.
Yes funny as hell these fools still think they are going to get rich with their wagon hitched to that idiots train.
It might be preferable that they continue to support Solidcoin, lest they be mistaken by others for Bitcoin supporters.
So let BitcoinX attack, steal everyone's money, and have the PR mess be even 10x worse huh? He was in emergency mode as far as I am concerned, and as a Solidcoin holder a guy which bite CH Scam and now seek to pass the losses over to other's I and many others supported the move... And judging by the graphs I posted, there has been little resistance from the community.
Fix'd
EDIT: I have lost MUCH MORE with Bitcoin than I ever did with Solidcoin just to let you know.
So let BitcoinX attack, steal everyone's money, and have the PR mess be even 10x worse huh? He was in emergency mode as far as I am concerned, and as a Solidcoin holder a guy which bite CH Scam and now seek to pass the losses over to other's I and many others supported the move... And judging by the graphs I posted, there has been little resistance from the community.
Fix'd
The entire community was behind it. It's either that, BitcoinEx's attack.
More propeganda. Infact, SolidCoin24 (the last SC exchange now?) wanted to let it's customers decide which fork to support. RealSolid threatened to remove SC24 from the main website if SC24 didn't comply.
"The entire community"? There was a 5hr notice. For a project that is supposed to be global, how is 5hrs enough time to poll "the entire community"?
So the statement "The entire community was behind it " is blatantly false.
Interesting how most SC supporters think they can speak 'for the entire community'. Only if it's rule with an iron fist.
Even after he has touted how great solidcoin is and safe and secure it is?
That is BS. You are starting to believe your own misinformation as well as his.
EDIT: Why would the mainstream or anyone with a head on their shoulders invest into something that is so vulnerable to attacks, needs constant
What happens the next time another attack threat should surface? Restart block chain? Fork chain? Shutdown?
The entire community was behind it. It's either that, BitcoinEx's attack.
More propeganda. Infact, SolidCoin24 (the last SC exchange now?) wanted to let it's customers decide which fork to support. RealSolid threatened to remove SC24 from the main website if SC24 didn't comply.
"The entire community"? There was a 5hr notice. For a project that is supposed to be global, how is 5hrs enough time to poll "the entire community"?
So the statement "The entire community was behind it " is blatantly false.
Interesting how most SC supporters think they can speak 'for the entire community'. Only if it's ruled with an iron fist.
+1 I saw this too. How do you explain this "solidcoin supporter"?
The entire community was behind it. It's either that, BitcoinEx's attack.
More propeganda. Infact, SolidCoin24 (the last SC exchange now?) wanted to let it's customers decide which fork to support. RealSolid threatened to remove SC24 from the main website if SC24 didn't comply.
"The entire community"? There was a 5hr notice. For a project that is supposed to be global, how is 5hrs enough time to poll "the entire community"?
So the statement "The entire community was behind it " is blatantly false.
Interesting how most SC supporters think they can speak 'for the entire community'. Only if it's rule with an iron fist.
As a matter of fact, "shutdown of solidcoin" was not successful. Which, incidentally, disproves the thesis that all of the community was behind it
Maybe I should rephrase the statement, and say the VAST majority of the community signed off. There is about 4gh's (4x6990s) at the moment mining, and these people have already been told those coins are irrelevant and won't be counted by anyone in the community. Get more info on the "hash power" here...
http://solidcoin.kicks-ass.org/graphs/graphs.html
Well once again your statement is false. I'll count them solidcoins valid.
RS has taken most of the suggestions that have been given to him by the "real" solid coin community pretty seriously.
By "real" solid coin community, you mean the people who agree with him. People who disagree with him are labeled as "trolls".
As far as him working by himself, that's not really something he can control. He is always open for help from others, and has stated numerous times that he would like to have a team, which is part of the reason why the "tax" is going into effect. Programmers don't like working for free you know 
.
. People who have mentioned flaws in Solidcoin have been labeled trolls and then banned from both IRC and the solidcoin forums. That is not "open for help from others", that is quite the opposite. Perhaps you are right that he cannot control his reactions to criticism. Currently, I would not bring any bug or design flaw to CH's attention. I would prefer to be able to obtain news about SolidCoin than risk getting banned for "trolling".
Also, some programmers don't need to be paid for their efforts, they are happy to volunteer their work. You may have noticed a few of them put together an entire operating system
P.S. Solidcoin was not "shutdown", it was forked.
The entire community was behind it. It's either that, BitcoinEx's attack.
More propeganda. Infact, SolidCoin24 (the last SC exchange now?) wanted to let it's customers decide which fork to support. RealSolid threatened to remove SC24 from the main website if SC24 didn't comply.
"The entire community"? There was a 5hr notice. For a project that is supposed to be global, how is 5hrs enough time to poll "the entire community"?
So the statement "The entire community was behind it " is blatantly false.
Interesting how most SC supporters think they can speak 'for the entire community'. Only if it's ruled with an iron fist.
RS has taken most of the suggestions that have been given to him by the "real" solid coin community pretty seriously. He's not taking this "one man" approach as this post would like to make it seem. We have been in discussion in the solidcoin forum on how to seriously improve the currency so that it's perfect, and he has been pretty receptive.
As far as him working by himself, that's not really something he can control. He is always open for help from others, and has stated numerous times that he would like to have a team, which is part of the reason why the "tax" is going into effect. Programmers don't like working for free you know.
As far as him working by himself, that's not really something he can control. He is always open for help from others, and has stated numerous times that he would like to have a team, which is part of the reason why the "tax" is going into effect. Programmers don't like working for free you know
. Correction: IT TOOK ONE MAN TO MAKE THE CALL TO SHUT DOWN SOLIDCOIN.
But I thought solidcoin was basically unbreakable by CH's own words.
. No. Just looking at his track record of failing and having to put band-aid after band-aid on it tells me he will do the same.
As a matter of fact, "shutdown of solidcoin" was not successful. Which, incidentally, disproves the thesis that all of the community was behind it
Maybe I should rephrase the statement, and say the VAST majority of the community signed off. There is about 4gh's (4x6990s) at the moment mining, and these people have already been told those coins are irrelevant and won't be counted by anyone in the community. Get more info on the "hash power" here...
http://solidcoin.kicks-ass.org/graphs/graphs.html
As a matter of fact, "shutdown of solidcoin" was not successful. Which, incidentally, disproves the thesis that all of the community was behind it
Good point: I still see blocks being generated.
But I thought solidcoin was basically unbreakable by CH's own words.
Apparently it will in version 2.0. But we all have to wait and see don't we . It will be for sure, running only at CH's LAN without external internet connection, it will be safer than ever. It can run for millenniums without being ever hacked.
Jump to: