Pages:
Author

Topic: Account for Rent - page 2. (Read 1762 times)

hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
March 11, 2015, 12:53:58 AM
#18
The post above me made a great point. If you put account under rent, campaigns will not accept you because you are not the original owner of the account. The highest payout campaign right now is BitX and they are charing 0.0014 for senior members. If you post 3 posts a day for 1 week. It should be 0.0014 times 3 times 7 which is 0.0294 which is not 0.04. Which campaign are you talking about?

BIT-X is the highest paying campaign that pays per post but there are higher paying ones that are smaller, more selective, and have stricter rules. For example, CoinRoyale pays senior members and higher 0.04 BTC for a minimum of 20 posts per week so 3 posts a day for 1 week should be enough. There are others that pay slightly lower than this too including FortuneJack which pays 0.03 BTC for 25 posts a week and OcupyCoin which pays 0.1 BTC for 50 posts a month.

A list of all current signature campaigns can be found here.
Based on your above posts CoinRoyale is the only campaign that allows you to earn 0.04 posting three times per day. If this was it, there are many bugs to it.

1. You would have to keep reapplying everytime it gets rented because you have to change the bitcoin address everytime.
2. Since you have to change your address, the signature campaign manager may get suspicious and disqualify you to the campaign
3. If you are caught you could possibly get negative trust on the account and it will be worth less than 0.3 and the OP could default on the loan


Also if OP doesn't sell his account, He may  kicked from the campaign due to inactivity
ALSO, if you earn 0.04 a week and you are getting 0.04 a week you are making no profit. I suggest you just sell the account instead.
sr. member
Activity: 542
Merit: 251
March 10, 2015, 11:33:44 PM
#17
I don't think that I have ever seen anyone rent a account it is a neat idea, but I can see the account being found pretty easy or someone just jacking the account in general.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
March 10, 2015, 09:58:38 PM
#16
The post above me made a great point. If you put account under rent, campaigns will not accept you because you are not the original owner of the account. The highest payout campaign right now is BitX and they are charing 0.0014 for senior members. If you post 3 posts a day for 1 week. It should be 0.0014 times 3 times 7 which is 0.0294 which is not 0.04. Which campaign are you talking about?

BIT-X is the highest paying campaign that pays per post but there are higher paying ones that are smaller, more selective, and have stricter rules. For example, CoinRoyale pays senior members and higher 0.04 BTC for a minimum of 20 posts per week so 3 posts a day for 1 week should be enough. There are others that pay slightly lower than this too including FortuneJack which pays 0.03 BTC for 25 posts a week and OcupyCoin which pays 0.1 BTC for 50 posts a month.

A list of all current signature campaigns can be found here.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 09:45:40 PM
#15
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.

If the account is sold then ill keep the deposit.
About scamming or taking loans u are right!
So the person who Rent the account should have a messege in the pm signature that says Account Rented


I believe this is the correct thing to do as well. If I were you, I would have the bio put as "Account Under Rent". If the renter changes this text at any period during the rent time, the security deposited should be voided.
I don't think many people would agree to this because many signature campaigns would potentially not accept someone if they are not the original owner. Also you do not have the ability to give default trust negative feedback meaning that if someone were to change the signature then by default others will not see it.

Plus having the signature saying the account is rented means that they would not be able to devote the account to a signature campaign as most campaigns require that only their signature be displayed

The post above me made a great point. If you put account under rent, campaigns will not accept you because you are not the original owner of the account. The highest payout campaign right now is BitX and they are charing 0.0014 for senior members. If you post 3 posts a day for 1 week. It should be 0.0014 times 3 times 7 which is 0.0294 which is not 0.04. Which campaign are you talking about?
I have seen marcotheminer reject people from his campaign because they were obviously using a purchased account, this may change somewhat with the autoenrollment. However most signature campaigns do not allow for any of their participants to have anything in their signature field other then the exact signature they are advertising.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
March 10, 2015, 09:37:12 PM
#14
I Rent a Sr Member Account enrroled in a signature campaign.

Daily payment: 0.0065BTC  (3 posts)
Or
Weekly payment: 0.04BTC

Deposit: 0.3BTC

Deposit will be back when the Rent ends.

Regards!
 
you should rethink your intentions were. after that you can write down some of the terms or agreements. because this is the first time like this. advice above all a friend can be considered to you
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
March 10, 2015, 09:13:01 PM
#13
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.

If the account is sold then ill keep the deposit.
About scamming or taking loans u are right!
So the person who Rent the account should have a messege in the pm signature that says Account Rented


I believe this is the correct thing to do as well. If I were you, I would have the bio put as "Account Under Rent". If the renter changes this text at any period during the rent time, the security deposited should be voided.
I don't think many people would agree to this because many signature campaigns would potentially not accept someone if they are not the original owner. Also you do not have the ability to give default trust negative feedback meaning that if someone were to change the signature then by default others will not see it.

Plus having the signature saying the account is rented means that they would not be able to devote the account to a signature campaign as most campaigns require that only their signature be displayed

The post above me made a great point. If you put account under rent, campaigns will not accept you because you are not the original owner of the account. The highest payout campaign right now is BitX and they are charing 0.0014 for senior members. If you post 3 posts a day for 1 week. It should be 0.0014 times 3 times 7 which is 0.0294 which is not 0.04. Which campaign are you talking about?
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 09:00:12 PM
#12
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.

If the account is sold then ill keep the deposit.
About scamming or taking loans u are right!
So the person who Rent the account should have a messege in the pm signature that says Account Rented


I believe this is the correct thing to do as well. If I were you, I would have the bio put as "Account Under Rent". If the renter changes this text at any period during the rent time, the security deposited should be voided.
I don't think many people would agree to this because many signature campaigns would potentially not accept someone if they are not the original owner. Also you do not have the ability to give default trust negative feedback meaning that if someone were to change the signature then by default others will not see it.

Plus having the signature saying the account is rented means that they would not be able to devote the account to a signature campaign as most campaigns require that only their signature be displayed
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 08:49:48 PM
#11
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.

If the account is sold then ill keep the deposit.
About scamming or taking loans u are right!
So the person who Rent the account should have a messege in the pm signature that says Account Rented


I believe this is the correct thing to do as well. If I were you, I would have the bio put as "Account Under Rent". If the renter changes this text at any period during the rent time, the security deposited should be voided.

Yes! I dont know if this idea of renting will work. But seems good to me.  Smiley
Lets see what happen.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1514
March 10, 2015, 08:44:48 PM
#10
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.

If the account is sold then ill keep the deposit.
About scamming or taking loans u are right!
So the person who Rent the account should have a messege in the pm signature that says Account Rented


I believe this is the correct thing to do as well. If I were you, I would have the bio put as "Account Under Rent". If the renter changes this text at any period during the rent time, the security deposited should be voided.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 08:42:21 PM
#9
Why are you renting your account with the risk of it being scammed? You make more than 0.04 a week by signing up with signature campaigns so it would be useless. From now on, I don't think you can use your account as collateral because people can refer to this post and assume that the account is being rented.

Well... is not this account, its another one.
I cant post that much so... would be perfect to me if I Rent it.
Regards!!

Oh that makes more sense to me! Could you provide us with more detail? Does it have positive or negative trust?

Neutral trust.
Enrroled in a signature campaign already.
Only 3 posts a day will pay the Rent.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
March 10, 2015, 08:38:59 PM
#8
Why are you renting your account with the risk of it being scammed? You make more than 0.04 a week by signing up with signature campaigns so it would be useless. From now on, I don't think you can use your account as collateral because people can refer to this post and assume that the account is being rented.

Well... is not this account, its another one.
I cant post that much so... would be perfect to me if I Rent it.
Regards!!

Oh that makes more sense to me! Could you provide us with more detail? Does it have positive or negative trust?
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 08:34:31 PM
#7
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.

If the account is sold then ill keep the deposit.
About scamming or taking loans u are right!
So the person who Rent the account should have a messege in the pm signature that says Account Rented
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 08:31:11 PM
#6
Why are you renting your account with the risk of it being scammed? You make more than 0.04 a week by signing up with signature campaigns so it would be useless. From now on, I don't think you can use your account as collateral because people can refer to this post and assume that the account is being rented.

Well... is not this account, its another one.
I cant post that much so... would be perfect to me if I Rent it.
Regards!!
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1514
March 10, 2015, 08:30:29 PM
#5
Who is responsible if the person were to scam a user out of an amount greater than .3 BTC? Or take a loan out? Or even sell the account? These type of things should probably be discussed prior to any deals being done. Good luck.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 08:29:08 PM
#4
People must remember to use a trusted escrow in this kind of situation with the deposit. I've seen a lot of people selling accounts for 0.3 BTC so this plus the monthly payment would be a decent profit for a desperate scammer or seller.

And just to say I am not accusing OP of anything, it seems a reasonable idea.

Im ok using scrow, of course that 0.3 plus 0.16 would be good to sell the account but I would never scam!
Anyway scrow will be the best in this situation.
Regards
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
March 10, 2015, 08:27:18 PM
#3
Why are you renting your account with the risk of it being scammed? You make more than 0.04 a week by signing up with signature campaigns so it would be useless. From now on, I don't think you can use your account as collateral because people can refer to this post and assume that the account is being rented.
sr. member
Activity: 470
Merit: 250
March 10, 2015, 08:25:07 PM
#2
People must remember to use a trusted escrow in this kind of situation with the deposit. I've seen a lot of people selling accounts for 0.3 BTC so this plus the monthly payment would be a decent profit for a desperate scammer or seller.

And just to say I am not accusing OP of anything, it seems a reasonable idea.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 10, 2015, 08:10:36 PM
#1
I Rent a Sr Member Account enrroled in a signature campaign.

Daily payment: 0.0065BTC  (3 posts)
Or
Weekly payment: 0.04BTC

Deposit: 0.3BTC

Deposit will be back when the Rent ends.

Regards!
 
Pages:
Jump to: