This story doesn't seem to check out. I searched through the
seclog archives between June 15 to October 15th, and only found 2 entries:
August 14, 2017, 05:40:20 PM - shezu007 - password changed
October 13, 2017, 05:24:52 PM - shezu007 - password changed
The campaign post was made August 13, 2017, 02:02:57 PM, which is almost 24 hours before the first password change, when you supposedly got hacked. It appears that you started managing/running the social media campaign for B8Ball on August 12, 2017, 06:00:28 AM, and even worse, you posted the
B8Ball ANN on August 06, 2017, 02:28:11 PM, over a week before you got hacked.
Basic Timeline (from what I grasp)June 20, 2017, 06:29:11 AM - Your account is created
August 04, 2017, 03:38:25 PM - You announce a
signature/logo design service, and claim that the Tiger Beer logo was created by you.
[1] In the time span of 3 minutes, 3 accounts vouch for your services from accounts with a username format of
August 06, 2017, 02:28:11 PM - You announce B8Ball Pool, a shady ICO
August 13, 2017, 02:02:57 PM - You launch B8Ball Pool's signature campaign that promises payments of up to 1.1
BTC for one month of the campaign
August 14, 2017, 07:39:27 AM -
B8Ball Project is up for sale, because no one trusts you
August 14, 2017, 05:40:20 PM - Password change
October 13, 2017, 05:24:52 PM - Password change
It does not look like you got hacked, and if you need, the scam signature campaign was launched prior to getting hacked. Your post history is identical when comparing the posts after and during the period between the 2 password changes.
---
Alternative Timeline:You buy this account on October 2nd from McKane, a known account seller unaware of the history behind your purchased account.
You change the password on October 13 (
)
---
Either way, I'm not removing my negative trust. My apologies at the delay in response, unfortunately I was not at home earlier. I have updated my negative trust to increase it's accuracy though.
Either:
a) Offered a signature campaign that pays a ridiculously high rate, without any escrow and talks about needing crowdfunding to build their game. No one was paid from the campaign, as far as I know.
b) Bought account.
This user claims their account was hacked when the campaign was launched, however has not provided any form of proof, and their claims are rendered incorrect by the forums seclog; they were lying. Any of those 3 makes that individual untrustworthy in my opinion.
[1] That in itself is shady, in my opinion