[ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] - page 84.

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Bargraphics on June 02, 2014, 07:52:15 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:48:04 PM

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price. It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.

Why let filthy fiat get between two of Bitcoin's greatest visionaries?

The MSD.

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bargraphics on June 02, 2014, 07:52:15 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:48:04 PM

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price. It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.

You traded one security for another, your basis in the first security is what counts. You did not purchase the second security you did an exchange.

bigdude

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 500

Dolphins Finance TRUSTED FINANCE

Ken,

Can you give some information about the future prospects of the business so investors can decide to keep their shares or have them reimbursed.

Assuming all investors shares are reimbursed for those who choose so, what then for the rest of the company?

What are your plans?

What are the prospects?

Clearly this is a complete stuff up, so now is the time to simply be clear and transparent on everything.

snowdropfore

hero member

Activity: 843

Merit: 1001

i do not understand ,i bought shares at many price, 0.0025,0.005,0.001.00089,0.0005 so what should i refund?? or i can still keep my shares???

pedrog

legendary

Activity: 2786

Merit: 1031

Quote from: ?? on ??

OK Ken so you will need to find 10,000,000 x $0.25 which is 2.5Mill USD. A bit less that I thought before - will this bankrupt the company?

How do you know that?

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

OK Ken so you will need to find 10,000,000 x $0.25 which is 2.5Mill USD. A bit less that I thought before - will this bankrupt the company?

No, we did not sell 10,000,000 shares @ $.025, sorry.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:48:04 PM

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price. It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

If you bought on BTCT, they sent you an email everytime you bought at the exact time and date you bought along with the price and the number of shares lol

Not only that. Burnside sent out API Keys that should let you access your records. BTCT.co is still up btw.

shaofis

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:41:04 PM

The MSD says the investors original purchase price, so the second IPO if you tendered shares from the first IPO you will receive the first IPO price of .0005 BTC if you want a refund.

I guess you leave no option but for everyone here to take it up with MSD directly. How do you think you'll fare if that happens?

arousedrhino

sr. member

Activity: 347

Merit: 250

Quote from: sartech on June 02, 2014, 07:48:03 PM

Quote from: iamnot_ on June 02, 2014, 07:45:07 PM

Ken are you able to mention anything today about the Hashfast situation or future develops for the company? I know there are many who may be interested in keeping their shares despite all this MSD stuff.

+1

+1 Would like an answer to this as well.

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:41:04 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:21:16 PM

Quote from: Jasun7211 on June 02, 2014, 07:16:15 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Ken had two separate IPOs, one @.0005 and one @.0025.
The people who bought his second IPO are getting 20 cents on the dollar. Either MSD is not aware of this, or Ken is lying again

I'd imagine both ipo s would be the same as the first ipo had a much lower BTC/USD price. Remember you guys need to look at this from the establishment's view. Business views arn't the state's. The state just needs to be legaly sufficient!!

If investors purchased shares (not tendered shares from the first IPO) in the second IPO, they will be getting ~$.25 per share, provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

It doesn't matter where the shares were purchased from,

As soon as you tendered them to a whole new "IPO" the "IPO" that they are currently "making you refund' that is named "ActiveMining".

You owe investors (Anyone with shares regardless of where they came from) 0.0025 BTC Per share. Whatever BTC Price was when you opened up the new IPO (July 8th by my records https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2685508) is the USD you have to pay + "8% Interest")

http://www.coindesk.com/price/

On July 8th, BTC was at $74.56 by CoinDesks Historical Price so each share would be worth $0.1864

So to put this in perspective, every 10,000 Shares of ActiveMining would get a refund of $1,864 or $2,500 at Ken's ~$0.25.

The MSD says the investors original purchase price, so the second IPO if you tendered shares from the first IPO you will receive the first IPO price of .0005 BTC if you want a refund.

There's no first or second IPO Ken. AMC wasn't told to repay investors, ActiveMining was. When we Tendered them over that was our "purchase" of ActiveMining at a 1:1 ratio. We purchased ActiveMining with our AMC Shares at ActiveMining's IPO Price. There's no way around this logically and the MSD would agree wholeheartedly.

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price. It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

sartech

full member

Activity: 209

Merit: 100

Quote from: iamnot_ on June 02, 2014, 07:45:07 PM

Ken are you able to mention anything today about the Hashfast situation or future develops for the company? I know there are many who may be interested in keeping their shares despite all this MSD stuff.

+1

iamnot_

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Ken are you able to mention anything today about the Hashfast situation or future develops for the company? I know there are many who may be interested in keeping their shares despite all this MSD stuff.

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: shrodes on June 02, 2014, 07:33:05 PM

Pretty sure I bought most of mine at 0.0025, but is there any way of getting BTCT data now?

No, all you can see is the ammount you tendered to BF in your BF log. You can't login to btc-tc anymore.

Ken how do we prove what we paid for them on BTC-TC?

The investor will have to prove what they paid with documents. Some of the details with MSD have to be ironed out.

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Yeah I can prove I moved shares from BTCT to Bitfunder.. And then from Bitfunder to Cryptotrade

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:21:16 PM

Quote from: Jasun7211 on June 02, 2014, 07:16:15 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Ken had two separate IPOs, one @.0005 and one @.0025.
The people who bought his second IPO are getting 20 cents on the dollar. Either MSD is not aware of this, or Ken is lying again

I'd imagine both ipo s would be the same as the first ipo had a much lower BTC/USD price. Remember you guys need to look at this from the establishment's view. Business views arn't the state's. The state just needs to be legaly sufficient!!

If investors purchased shares (not tendered shares from the first IPO) in the second IPO, they will be getting ~$.25 per share, provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

It doesn't matter where the shares were purchased from,

As soon as you tendered them to a whole new "IPO" the "IPO" that they are currently "making you refund' that is named "ActiveMining".

You owe investors (Anyone with shares regardless of where they came from) 0.0025 BTC Per share. Whatever BTC Price was when you opened up the new IPO (July 8th by my records https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2685508) is the USD you have to pay + "8% Interest")

http://www.coindesk.com/price/

On July 8th, BTC was at $74.56 by CoinDesks Historical Price so each share would be worth $0.1864

So to put this in perspective, every 10,000 Shares of ActiveMining would get a refund of $1,864 or $2,500 at Ken's ~$0.25.

The MSD says the investors original purchase price, so the second IPO if you tendered shares from the first IPO you will receive the first IPO price of .0005 BTC if you want a refund.

shrodes

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:21:16 PM

provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

Only the Whales bought at 0.0025 and they have all sold up long ago and gone. I bet almost no-one left here will find in their BF log that they bought at exactly 0.0025.

So this is a joke.

Pretty sure I bought most of mine at 0.0025, but is there any way of getting BTCT data now?

Jasun7211

sr. member

Activity: 517

Merit: 250

All I kmow is I was in actm when btc was around $13 per btc, so mayne that .05 is actually lookimg pretty good

knybe

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

decentralize EVERYTHING...

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:21:16 PM

Quote from: Jasun7211 on June 02, 2014, 07:16:15 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Ken had two separate IPOs, one @.0005 and one @.0025.
The people who bought his second IPO are getting 20 cents on the dollar. Either MSD is not aware of this, or Ken is lying again

I'd imagine both ipo s would be the same as the first ipo had a much lower BTC/USD price. Remember you guys need to look at this from the establishment's view. Business views arn't the state's. The state just needs to be legaly sufficient!!

If investors purchased shares (not tendered shares from the first IPO) in the second IPO, they will be getting ~$.25 per share, provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

I never had access to the .0005 IPO, only the .0025 which I bought on btc-tc.

What then?

sartech

full member

Activity: 209

Merit: 100

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 07:07:35 PM

Quote from: LorenzoMoney on June 02, 2014, 06:58:14 PM

Ken,

5 cents a share is totally unacceptable.

Unless this offer is made in bitcoin not USD, I will be calling whomever it is in the Missouri Securities Division and I will be asking that they take a firmer response to this.

The only way I would not take such action would be if you finally got honest in regard to all the financials and if you began to take good advice from those members of our crew here who actually understand engineering.

I have been an early and loyal supporter of your project and deserve better treatment.

Lorenzo Money

Quote from: kslaughter on June 02, 2014, 06:50:17 PM

Quote from: LorenzoMoney on June 02, 2014, 06:44:58 PM

Ken,

At this time, I would be willing to sell the shares I bought from you for .0005 bitcoin each.
I bought just 1000 additional shares on Crypto-Trade recently, but let's just talk about the shares I bought in the original IPO.
Please explain how we shall do this.

The easiest way would be for you to just let me transfer the shares and then you multiply that amount by .0005 and send the bitcoin to an address I will provide.

How long do you think this process will take?

Lorenzo Money

This is what they came up with, it is what the law in Missouri states, you get your money back plus 8%/year interest. So, if you don't want their deal keep your shares, your choice.

So if i keep my shares ,i will get dividends in next months/years?

Topic: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] - page 84. (Read 629899 times)