ActiveMining Overview and Speculation Thread - page 74.

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

So, here's my back of the napkin dividend calculations:

Current Difficulty: 37,508,353
(Working off of 20% increases per diff. increase period)
2nd diff. increase in August difficulty projection: 45,010,023.64

ActM Expecting 6.6TH/s by mid Aug.
(6606028.8 MH/s)

73.8117 BTC/day
2214.351 (30 days profit)
2214.351/10m = .0002214351/share (Only relevant if .0025/share hasn't been dispersed via divs.)
2214.351/25m = .00008857404/share (more realistic)
   3.5% ~~weekly~~ every 30 days
   or
   ~~184%~~ 48% APR

What say ye?

Edit: Oops. Miscalculated... I started doing one thing and switched mid calculation. It isn't 3.5% weekly, but monthly, which moves our APR.

dexX7

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1026

Quote from: matuszed on July 24, 2013, 10:41:45 AM

+1 that software is legit. Are you a professional trader by any chance?

No, it's just a hobby and I fully support the Bitcoin movement. Wink

matuszed

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: dexX7 on July 24, 2013, 10:39:57 AM

Quote from: slightboyme on July 24, 2013, 10:35:22 AM

mind sharing what tool this is ? thanks

Sure, it's NinjaTrader. NT allows historical data import via CSV files. File specifications can be found here. Wink

+1 that software is legit. Are you a professional trader by any chance?

Also plug for anyone interested in a Fast Hash Us group buy

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/us-group-buy-virtual-mining-corp-fast-hash-one-261708

dexX7

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1026

Quote from: slightboyme on July 24, 2013, 10:35:22 AM

mind sharing what tool this is ? thanks

Sure, it's NinjaTrader. NT allows historical data import via CSV files. File specifications can be found here. Wink

slightboyme

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Quote from: dexX7 on July 24, 2013, 10:23:12 AM

Quote from: drdanishkhan on July 24, 2013, 10:02:26 AM

Why the sudden selling???

Which sudden selling? The range .003 - .004 is traded for some time now.

mind sharing what tool this is ? thanks

sayaz

member

Activity: 119

Merit: 10

It's a speculators dream

dexX7

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1026

Quote from: drdanishkhan on July 24, 2013, 10:02:26 AM

Why the sudden selling???

Which sudden selling? The range .003 - .004 is traded for some time now.

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

Quote from: drdanishkhan on July 24, 2013, 10:02:26 AM

Why the sudden selling???

I was wondering the same. Possible confusion over the ActiveMining release? We're still sitting at .0036 and it seems to be bouncing around that number, so it isn't anything massive. I just see a lot of small sells consistently.

On the speculation front:

Has anyone ran any numbers with projected difficulty/hash rate to get a rough dividend projection for ActiveMining? I can run numbers, but their always seems to be some math-head out there that loves doing it and being way more thorough than myself.

What do you guys think we will see in 1mo, 3mo, 6mo?

drdanishkhan

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Why the sudden selling???

sayaz

member

Activity: 119

Merit: 10

Do you even regurgitate already over used memes?

MonkeyMarcel

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Quote from: VinceSamios on July 23, 2013, 09:42:07 AM

Sorry to spoil the party - in this thread, I'm still going to use AM :-P I have no interest in ASICMiner, old, slow, boring, high power consumption, ASIC technology (lol)

You can use whatever you like, people just wont know what you are talking about.

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

Quote from: VinceSamios on July 23, 2013, 09:59:54 AM

Well in that case, technically speaking, if you want to be pedantic about it, you should be referring to ASICMiner as G.ASICMINER-PT

Technically speaking to use "AM" in reference to ActiveMiner is more correct than using it in reference to ASICMiner, since the latter already includes an acronym. So ASICMiner should become ASICM.

I'm 90% being argumentative for the sake of it, and 10% because my primary interest at the moment is in AM (the active one) hence I'd prefer to type fewer characters - we're all smart people, I'm sure we can guess when someone is using the acronym "AM" in the ActiveMiner thread they are referring to the thread topic.

Regardless of where your assets are and what is easier for you, personally, it would be appropriate for you to use the proper identifier with the corresponding stock. I'll drop this line of conversation at that, since we have more important things to discuss here LIKE ZOMGPROFITZ!!!!!11ELEVENTEEN!

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: statdude on July 22, 2013, 02:39:22 PM

I will pay
Premium of .0004 per
.003 strike put,
60 days expiration

My options model values these at .000179-.00029, so this is a nice premium, and 11.6% return in 60 days.

BTCT or BitFunder preferred.
20 BTC ready to go.

Bump

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Well in that case, technically speaking, if you want to be pedantic about it, you should be referring to ASICMiner as G.ASICMINER-PT

Technically speaking to use "AM" in reference to ActiveMiner is more correct than using it in reference to ASICMiner, since the latter already includes an acronym. So ASICMiner should become ASICM.

I'm 90% being argumentative for the sake of it, and 10% because my primary interest at the moment is in AM (the active one) hence I'd prefer to type fewer characters - we're all smart people, I'm sure we can guess when someone is using the acronym "AM" in the ActiveMiner thread they are referring to the thread topic.

drdanishkhan

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

how about a vote.. ACTM vs ACM vs ActM

grimholt

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 10

Quote from: VinceSamios on July 23, 2013, 09:42:07 AM

Sorry to spoil the party - in this thread, I'm still going to use AM :-P I have no interest in ASICMiner, old, slow, boring, high power consumption, ASIC technology (lol)

The technology isn't really the point, we all know ACTM's technology is (will be) superior. The fact remains, however, that ASICMiner is already on the market, and you will only confuse people if you use their abbreviation when referring to ACTM.

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Sorry to spoil the party - in this thread, I'm still going to use AM :-P I have no interest in ASICMiner, old, slow, boring, high power consumption, ASIC technology (lol)

LordMeowMeow

sr. member

Activity: 617

Merit: 250

ACTM it is Cheesy

MonkeyMarcel

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 23, 2013, 08:19:33 AM

Quote from: hazryder on July 23, 2013, 08:15:23 AM

I'm happy with ACTM, ACM, ATM or even ACMN.

Of those options I like ACTM, its the closest to ActM that we have been using anyway

+1 for ACTM

neilol

sr. member

Activity: 302

Merit: 250

Back up!

Topic: ActiveMining Overview and Speculation Thread - page 74. (Read 168030 times)