.Also just to say the tender process is working, I did a Bitfunder tender and received the ActM shares about 23 hours later.
Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 264. (Read 479475 times)
Heh AMC has been a fun but somewhat rocky road to travel so far, hopefully ActM will be a smoother ride .
Also just to say the tender process is working, I did a Bitfunder tender and received the ActM shares about 23 hours later.
.Also just to say the tender process is working, I did a Bitfunder tender and received the ActM shares about 23 hours later.
Why is it the same people posting in this thread over and over again? Most of them are registered this year with very few posts...
Bitcoin was only 15.75 on January 1, 2013. A lot of people were like me and didn't really pay much attention to it until it showed quick upward movement in early March and then promptly flew off into space. I also didn't feel there was much to talk about until I invested in this security.
Ken: What's the plan in the case that ActiveMining doesn't get approved on btct.co?
This won't happen. If it does, then there is something inherently wrong with the btc-tc voting system
Ken: What's the plan in the case that ActiveMining doesn't get approved on btct.co?
If I have understood correctly, I can convert my AMC shares on Bitfunder to ActiveMining shares, correct? How would I go about doing so? Sorry if that is a dumb question, but I find this whole security rather confusing...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2685508
If I have understood correctly, I can convert my AMC shares on Bitfunder to ActiveMining shares, correct? How would I go about doing so? Sorry if that is a dumb question, but I find this whole security rather confusing...
Check post #3 on the first page of this thread
If I have understood correctly, I can convert my AMC shares on Bitfunder to ActiveMining shares, correct? How would I go about doing so? Sorry if that is a dumb question, but I find this whole security rather confusing...
No idea why this would be relevant. Since when is registration date and number of posts a good scale for measuring the quality of someones posts?
I'm not talking about the quality of anybody's posts.
I'm talking about the blatant sock puppet and shill accounts that are constantly hyping this stock up through the many AMC/Active mining threads. If you can't see what I'm talking about, you are completely blind.
Speaking for myself, I'm not even anonymous. And I've spoken to most of the other people giving useful comments on here outside of this forum (with names, details etc), so they are not sock puppets.
Also, if you read the thread, there are a lot of proper questions and responses and rather less hype than you may think.
In other news the logo redesign is coming on nicely, I'll have some more samples to show off later today.
Looking forward to seeing new samples!
+1
In other news the logo redesign is coming on nicely, I'll have some more samples to show off later today.
Looking forward to seeing new samples!
No idea why this would be relevant. Since when is registration date and number of posts a good scale for measuring the quality of someones posts?
I'm not talking about the quality of anybody's posts.
I'm talking about the blatant sock puppet and shill accounts that are constantly hyping this stock up through the many AMC/Active mining threads. If you can't see what I'm talking about, you are completely blind.
There will always be people (with all securities) interested in hyping a stock, posting positive shit without substance. These kinds of postings can usually be easily spotted, and any investor (with more than half a brain) should understand that they should be disregarded when evaluating the potential of the security.
Hey Ken, I transferred 520 shares on BTCT on the 20th but they still haven't come through on Bitfunder, I double checked the email I sent and all the details were exactly the same as the other successful transfers that I've made, hopefully you can look into this for me.
In other news the logo redesign is coming on nicely, I'll have some more samples to show off later today.
In other news the logo redesign is coming on nicely, I'll have some more samples to show off later today.
No idea why this would be relevant. Since when is registration date and number of posts a good scale for measuring the quality of someones posts?
I'm not talking about the quality of anybody's posts.
I'm talking about the blatant sock puppet and shill accounts that are constantly hyping this stock up through the many AMC/Active mining threads. If you can't see what I'm talking about, you are completely blind.
Judging by your own criteria I have to assess you as a shill and will consequently disregard your opinion. Thanks for the heads up.
No idea why this would be relevant. Since when is registration date and number of posts a good scale for measuring the quality of someones posts?
I'm not talking about the quality of anybody's posts.
I'm talking about the blatant sock puppet and shill accounts that are constantly hyping this stock up through the many AMC/Active mining threads. If you can't see what I'm talking about, you are completely blind.
Why is it the same people posting in this thread over and over again? Most of them are registered this year with very few posts...
No idea why this would be relevant. Since when is registration date and number of posts a good scale for measuring the quality of someones posts?
Also:
Summary - saveawedge
[...]
Date Registered: March 23, 2013, 12:08:13 PM
[...]
Date Registered: March 23, 2013, 12:08:13 PM
Stop posting in this thread, your registration date indicates that you are not suited to write posts of the required quality!
Why is it the same people posting in this thread over and over again? Most of them are registered this year with very few posts...
What do you mean by that last sentence? What is wrong with that?
Why is it the same people posting in this thread over and over again? Most of them are registered this year with very few posts...
Asset Name AMC
Asset Issuer AMC
Shares Total 100,000,000
Shares Issued 6,400,000
Pays Dividends Yes
Issuer may Increase Shares: No
Issuer may Modify Description: Option not set.
https://bitfunder.com/asset/AMC#pane_profile
https://bitfunder.com/asset/ActiveMining
Asset Name ActiveMining
Asset Issuer AMC
Shares Total 25,000,000
Shares Issued 5,900,815 (changed by +300000 shares)
Pays Dividends Yes
Issuer may Increase Shares: Yes, with vote.
Issuer may Modify Description: Yes, without vote.
Outstanding 2924534 / 5000000
https://btct.co/security/AMC-PT
I really like to understand, wtf is going on with bitfunder and changing share number.
Ken, stop avoiding my questions.
Cheers
Asset Issuer AMC
Shares Total 100,000,000
Shares Issued 6,400,000
Pays Dividends Yes
Issuer may Increase Shares: No
Issuer may Modify Description: Option not set.
https://bitfunder.com/asset/AMC#pane_profile
https://bitfunder.com/asset/ActiveMining
Asset Name ActiveMining
Asset Issuer AMC
Shares Total 25,000,000
Shares Issued 5,900,815 (changed by +300000 shares)
Pays Dividends Yes
Issuer may Increase Shares: Yes, with vote.
Issuer may Modify Description: Yes, without vote.
Outstanding 2924534 / 5000000
https://btct.co/security/AMC-PT
I really like to understand, wtf is going on with bitfunder and changing share number.
Ken, stop avoiding my questions.
Cheers
When AMC shares are tendered for ActM shares, Ken has to issue those shares in ActM, that's why the number keeps increasing, as more are tendered.
Is there any advantage or disadvantage transferring AMC to ActiveMining shares?
AMC is mining only, AM is mining and hardware sales.
AMC has 100,000,000 shares, AM has 25,000,000 shares.
AM is also guaranteeing that the first 10,000,000 shares will get 0.0025 per share before the other 15,000,000 get ANY dividends.
Is there any advantage or disadvantage transferring AMC to ActiveMining shares?
Jump to: