[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 195.

antcastle

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: finlof on December 30, 2013, 10:49:27 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 10:45:46 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:28:36 AM

Quote from: kleeck on December 30, 2013, 10:22:06 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:12:26 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 08:44:31 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

OK, then he can tell us who it is.
It's not "my" pool but yes I do mine there Tongue

I also do know who it is.

What machines is he/she using?

Pretty good ones apparently Tongue

You are saying that this is an individual who is adding hashing power in increments of 25 TH? What miners could these potentially be?

he never said it was an individual.

He never said it wasn't Active Mining gear. If it's Active Mining gear, then we are mining with at least the same hashrate. Can't wait for my dividends to come in

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: finlof on December 30, 2013, 10:49:27 AM

He never said it was an individual.

Bargraphics was asked "what machines is he/she using?" He did not correct the assumption it was an individual. But if it isn't, then he can tell us who it is. No need to keep it secret.

finlof

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 10:45:46 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:28:36 AM

Quote from: kleeck on December 30, 2013, 10:22:06 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:12:26 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 08:44:31 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

It's not "my" pool but yes I do mine there Tongue

I also do know who it is.

What machines is he/she using?

Pretty good ones apparently Tongue

You are saying that this is an individual who is adding hashing power in increments of 25 TH? What miners could these potentially be?

he never said it was an individual.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:28:36 AM

Quote from: kleeck on December 30, 2013, 10:22:06 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:12:26 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 08:44:31 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

It's not "my" pool but yes I do mine there Tongue

I also do know who it is.

What machines is he/she using?

Pretty good ones apparently Tongue

You are saying that this is an individual who is adding hashing power in increments of 25 TH? What miners could these potentially be?

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: kleeck on December 30, 2013, 10:22:06 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:12:26 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 08:44:31 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

It's not "my" pool but yes I do mine there Tongue

I also do know who it is.

What machines is he/she using?

Pretty good ones apparently Tongue

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 10:12:26 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 08:44:31 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

It's not "my" pool but yes I do mine there Tongue

I also do know who it is.

What machines is he/she using?

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 08:44:31 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

It's not "my" pool but yes I do mine there Tongue

I also do know who it is.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 08:36:11 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Do you know who it is? Whoever it is is mining on your pool - the one you suggested Ken mine on.

They are adding in increments divisible by 25 TH.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 07:47:55 AM

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

It's not ActM. I know this for a fact, as much as I would rather it be them.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

225 TH/s is a nice, even 9x24.567 TH Fast-Hash One Platinum miners.

It goes from 65 TH (roughly 3x24.5 TH - could have been working out some bugs, bad chips, or hardware build issues), to 100 TH (roughly 4x24.5 TH), to 150 TH (roughly 6x24.5 TH), to 225 TH (roughly 9x24.5 Th)...

Whoever is mining is operating at roughly 2.25% of the global Bitcoin hash rate.

DoloresMaze

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: stenkross on December 30, 2013, 07:00:58 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 06:12:23 AM

Couldn't Active Mining been VMC's first customer, thus receiving the first "shipped" units?

How many chips does low-volume production produce?
Is it even theoretical possible for this to be ActM?

Yes, because Intellihash.
Intellihash makes everything 20% Cooler each time you use it, like so:

Code:

(FastHash)^IntelliHash = 120% hashrate.
((FastHash)^IntelliHash)^IntelliHash = MoarHash

As soon as Ken tweaks the tunnel diodes so that they edge-trigger and don't overflow the clock buffer (in about two weeks), the money will roll right in.

*The prototype ran fine, but Ken decided to update the web API on the ASICs to HTML5, so that's why the chips are a little late.

sparky999

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

Quote from: stenkross on December 30, 2013, 07:00:58 AM

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 06:12:23 AM

Couldn't Active Mining been VMC's first customer, thus receiving the first "shipped" units?

How many chips does low-volume production produce?
Is it even theoretical possible for this to be ActM?

theoretically possible, yes, but def not likely at this point.

stenkross

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 06:12:23 AM

Couldn't Active Mining been VMC's first customer, thus receiving the first "shipped" units?

How many chips does low-volume production produce?
Is it even theoretical possible for this to be ActM?

sparky999

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on December 30, 2013, 06:12:23 AM

Couldn't Active Mining been VMC's first customer, thus receiving the first "shipped" units?

Ken has said at least 50% of the production capabilities will beused to make miners for ActM

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Couldn't Active Mining been VMC's first customer, thus receiving the first "shipped" units?

funkymunky

sr. member

Activity: 283

Merit: 250

I know I am clutching at straws but this has just been declared by wizkid057 the Eligius operator that this is not Hashfast https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4208871

This "has" to be an ASIC manufacturer surely due to the massive increases - it's now at ~225 Th/s in the space of days.

One of the more educated and recent timeline predictions points to 24th December for Normal volume chip production starting.
Could these be the product of a new Low-volume chip production run?

I am definitely open to more educated and knowledgeable suggestions.

Quote from: thehun on December 28, 2013, 03:58:50 PM

Quote from: funkymunky on December 28, 2013, 05:16:13 AM

I posted this the other day, however with all the white noise on here it glossed over.

Does anyone have any comments or opinions on this?
The dates seem to fit quite nicely with our speculated timeline.

It's shot up from ~9Th/s on the 24Dec13 to ~162 Th/s as of today.

Quote from: funkymunky on December 24, 2013, 05:37:49 AM

Sorry for going out on a limb here and probably being over-optimistic but....

Is there anyway that this could be ActiveMining testing equipment?
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX

Or on the flip side

Is there any definitive proof that it is impossible for this to be an ActM farm?
(And no, I don't want to hear that it can't be ActM because it's a scam etc...)

On this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hashfast-mining-without-shipping-customer-gear-386532 people were speculating it could belong to HashFast... who knows?

sparky999

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

Quote from: MilkyLep on December 30, 2013, 01:18:09 AM

Now you should ask when orders placed in the past 2-3 months will ship...

Ken has already stated that there is approx a 2month pre-order queue, if the current schedule is 28th Feb - 20th March then we will have full scale eAsic production within the next 2 weeks.

thefunkybits

legendary