Pages:
Author

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 52. (Read 771280 times)

member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
Any opinions on Marc Andreessen's comments? http://bitcoinvox.com/index.php?view=article&article_id=82

"There is a big opportunity to apply custom silicon to mining," Andreessen said. "We're seeing a new wave of chip design around it, which is not something I would have predicted a year ago."

While mining operations can potentially be done on general-purpose chips, Andreessen stressed that Bitcoin mining is much more efficient on custom, specialized silicon.

"Mining is a very specific thing that you can highly parallelize," he said. "So I think that custom mining chips will dominate for quite a while."

Thanks for that, less running around looking for info always helps.
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
I am still fine with waiting for a distributed exchange for our shares, but only if that means that efforts used to getting us on a normal site are transferred to a distributed exchange, or Ken hiring someone to work on a distributed exchange.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
fingers crossed for may

hopefully we can get trading this week
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
I'm trolling? how long you been here chief?

EDIT: oh yeah. long enough for me to ignore you.
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
so… how's this little experiment/hobby coming along? …we hashing yet?

Not yet, supposedly in mid April/May.

He knows. He's trolling Wink

Oh, didn't realize that  Grin
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
Any opinions on Marc Andreessen's comments? http://bitcoinvox.com/index.php?view=article&article_id=82

"There is a big opportunity to apply custom silicon to mining," Andreessen said. "We're seeing a new wave of chip design around it, which is not something I would have predicted a year ago."

While mining operations can potentially be done on general-purpose chips, Andreessen stressed that Bitcoin mining is much more efficient on custom, specialized silicon.

"Mining is a very specific thing that you can highly parallelize," he said. "So I think that custom mining chips will dominate for quite a while."
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
so… how's this little experiment/hobby coming along? …we hashing yet?

Not yet, supposedly in mid April/May.

He knows. He's trolling Wink
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
so… how's this little experiment/hobby coming along? …we hashing yet?

Not yet, supposedly in mid April/May.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
so… how's this little experiment/hobby coming along? …we hashing yet?
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100

Hey guys, you're all missing the biggest issue with this calculation - it has a 10% conversion rate (USD/BTC) increase per MONTH built in. Remove that and you'll make a whopping $2000 on your $1.3M investment.

You CANNOT allow for an increase in the conversion rate to be factored into mining profitability, as you can simply hold the equivalent in BTC and see the same USD-denominated increase.

Just switch it over to BTC. Max profit: 1870 BTC. How did you get $2000?
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004

Jun-14 Cumulative Return = 959.00
May-14 Cumulative Return = 119.00

Difference = 840 BTC mined in 1 month
Total BTC mined in 1 month (3600 BTC x 30 days) = 108,000 BTC

840 BTC / 108,000 BTC = 0.007777 = 0.77 % of hashrate from May to June

LOL!  Ken updated VBS's spreadsheet.  I really missed that thing.  Funny stuff.
I can't believe he actually used The Genesis Block for the project projections. It is literally insulting to everyone who's invested with him that he'd spend 2 minutes putting that together. Nevermind that it's completely unrealistic and the numbers don't make any sense.
1. Ken's stated the first wafers will be arriving mid and end of April, with the bulk of the wafers arriving in May. Wafers in May to 1.2PH/s online in May? Keep in mind the only reason that estimate has a 28 day payoff is that it's saying that mining will start May 1 with 1.2PH/s, and make $1.2M.
2. Ken's previously stated the chips themselves will consume 2.5W for 1.9GH/s, or 1.31J/GH. Here he's using an efficiency of 1.31J/GH for the whole system. Where's the DC/DC conversion inefficiency? Additional loads like other chips and fans? AC/DC PSU inefficiency? AC costs at whatever building they're hosted at?
3. With no costs factored in for hosting in a DC and a $0.022/kWh electricity listed, I'd love to know what kind of arrangement he's made for a site with no capital expenditure and at cost electricity.

That he either doesn't have anything more substantive to share, or for some reason instead of presenting real estimates he's tossing this out here as a bone is very disconcerting.

Edit: I'll just leave this here as a cautionary tale.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1157524
This is probably actually the wrong thread for it as it should be in the VNC thread, but buyer beware.
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
Are You Shpongled?

Hey guys, you're all missing the biggest issue with this calculation - it has a 10% conversion rate (USD/BTC) increase per MONTH built in. Remove that and you'll make a whopping $2000 on your $1.3M investment.

You CANNOT allow for an increase in the conversion rate to be factored into mining profitability, as you can simply hold the equivalent in BTC and see the same USD-denominated increase.
I am seeing $1.3M profit by August, not $2000. http://thegenesisblock.com/mining/a/d9a917bb39
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000

Hey guys, you're all missing the biggest issue with this calculation - it has a 10% conversion rate (USD/BTC) increase per MONTH built in. Remove that and you'll make a whopping $2000 on your $1.3M investment.

You CANNOT allow for an increase in the conversion rate to be factored into mining profitability, as you can simply hold the equivalent in BTC and see the same USD-denominated increase.

EDIT: Seems I missed a digit somewhere. I hope for all of your sake that he actually delivers.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
@JoTheKhan:  Whoops ^^  We should reboot Stewartuk to start "Can we haz XCP" poll Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 250
Ken, are you looking into XCP? A distributed exchange that has already released command-line implementation and uses proof-of-burn to create the initial alt.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1wtz2b/2124_btc_destroyed_in_proofofburn/
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100

Jun-14 Cumulative Return = 959.00
May-14 Cumulative Return = 119.00

Difference = 840 BTC mined in 1 month
Total BTC mined in 1 month (3600 BTC x 30 days) = 108,000 BTC

840 BTC / 108,000 BTC = 0.007777 = 0.77 % of hashrate from May to June

LOL!  Ken updated VBS's spreadsheet.  I really missed that thing.  Funny stuff.

Just going by the projections he posted.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501

Jun-14 Cumulative Return = 959.00
May-14 Cumulative Return = 119.00

Difference = 840 BTC mined in 1 month
Total BTC mined in 1 month (3600 BTC x 30 days) = 108,000 BTC

840 BTC / 108,000 BTC = 0.007777 = 0.77 % of hashrate from May to June

LOL!  Ken updated VBS's spreadsheet.  I really missed that thing.  Funny stuff.
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100

Jun-14 Cumulative Return = 959.00
May-14 Cumulative Return = 119.00

Difference = 840 BTC mined in 1 month
Total BTC mined in 1 month (3600 BTC x 30 days) = 108,000 BTC

840 BTC / 108,000 BTC = 0.007777 = 0.77 % of hashrate from May to June
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
...
2. The vote convinced Ken to wait for Colored Coins which never came. I told them it was a dumb idea, they didn't listen we suffered a little more.
...

Hey, the Colored Coins are coming!  A few more weeks, and they'll be here.  What changed?  When you are not trading, that's 'coz Ken is listening to zum's poll results.  Have fun.

*Do you see that you leave open every option for Ken?
He promised CT.  He didn't deliver because people wanted CC.
When he finally goes with CT?  Well, he promised CT all along.  Win/win.  In your eyes, he can do no wrong.  And you sincerely don't see yourself as an apologist.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
@Main I agree, I don't think its a hard task at all. But there were times where we sat and decided to wait for Colored coins. You can't hold this time against Ken if we (not I, I was always for Crypto Trade But we as in the forum) told him that we wanted to wait for Colored Coins. I mean look back one page and you see someone else suggesting that we wait 2 More weeks for Colored Coins. This has been popping up through all of November and December, even some in January.

You can't scream at him to wait for Colored coins and then put it against him that he didn't do the implementation for Crypto Trade yet. That's just retarded. There were stupid polls and long fights about how everyone wants to do Colored Coins or w/e. So if anything you can say that Ken has had since Mid/Late December to have Crypto Trade up and running for us. Not since Mid November.

So if we are going to claim Ken has been neglectful with shares then we will have to say since Late December or the Beginning of January till Now. Still you are right, it should be done by now. If it comes down to it, he should just start doing it manually and grab the people who can to ship shares over to CryptoTrade while he has the free time to do so each week. (Like how he did from BTCT to Bitfunder)

This is bordering on absurd.

1.  Regardless of whether Ken wanted to move to CT or CC, verification needed to be done, so the script should have been written. (yes/no)

2.  Yes, a bunch of goofballs wanted CC.  They still do,  Nothing changed.  I guess we'll have to wait til all the kids agree, right?



1. Colored Coins would have him just send our shares to our address, he wouldn't need to verify anything right? Just check his asset list.

2. The vote convinced Ken to wait for Colored Coins which never came. I told them it was a dumb idea, they didn't listen we suffered a little more.

I don't wanna be called a Ken apologist so I'm gonna leave it at that. I think we should have had our shares back in early January if you ask me, I am just stating the series of events that have led us to where we find ourselves now. Is it Ken's fault, yes, do we have some blame in it? Probably, should it have been done by now? Fuck yes.
Pages:
Jump to: