Sometimes it's better if the accuser brings enough proofs and then go for tag or anything they want. If anyone needs to prove anything then it should be the accuser not the person who was accused. I don't want to name anyone which will definitely bring the conversation back which I don't want it to be in discussion again.
This could be either way though, depending on the situation. If there is a scam site around and some newbie account came up and said that he managed to withdraw a sizeable amount out of it, obviously the first instinct from members would be show the proof or else it's just a shill, right?
I am one person who doesn't like 1xbit, but my negative feedback is mostly for those who advertise it knowing that it's a scam. With cases such as OP's, I don't just leave feedback anyhow.
I had to dig deep to find the post that lead to OP getting tagged.
Could this be it?
Hello @1xbit_official
I have been gambling a long time now at 1xbit, never had any problems even with large withdrawals like 10BTC, they were always very fast not gonna lie about that despite all the other remarks on the web.
However now I made a withdrawal it was rejected and support told me to try again later. So when I try to make a new withdrawal, it seems all my withdrawal options are gone and after contacting support again they told me that I have to contact security, I did so yesterday, but I haven't received any kind of answer yet. So maybe its a little bit fast to contact you here, but could you maybe look into it?
Kind regards
I want to draw my conclusions after knowing why exactly OP was tagged
In OPs case since he/she does not have a history to judge, it's easy to miss-understand him perhaps.
You are right.
Exactly, I didn't shill, I have no signature campaign. I came here because I had an issue. Could I still be this "sock puppet" yes, but does signing those things make any difference? NO
And like you do, just don't give me any feedback unless you can prove that I am actually that "sock puppet".
I had to dig deep to find the post that lead to OP getting tagged
Could this be it?
...
Yep, that was the first post made by MrBrightside1, that started all this mess. After that JollyGood asked him to provide some evidence that he is indeed received 10 BTC from 1xbit, and after he failed to sign the message, he tagged him few days later.
First proof is a clickable link to a blockchain website such as blockchain.com/blockchair.com that shows you sent funds from your BTC wallet to the 1xbit scammers.
The second proof is a clickable link to a blockchain website such as blockchain.com/blockchair.com that shows the 1xbit scammers sent funds from their BTC wallet to your wallet.
The third would be for you to sign that address that you received funds from the 1xbit scammers with a message to prove you own it.
@JollyGood did you have time to check if what he is saying correct?
Regarding this, I didnt use a third party service or anything and I never will! But I hope people are smart enough to understand what I did. (but you have to look at the time of the message/post and the time of the transaction although it's also highly remarkable that after more than a yar that address became suddenly active while I became active here). But I repeat, I shouldn't be doing it and it even doesn't lead to anything, might as well be a company wallet, but with your practice how many innocents would end up in jail because of your "feeling".
Oh @Rikafip regarding your feedback, you don't get the point of it, not to mention your reference is no longer applicable because I changed it to an accurate feedback.
