What does crypto being labeled "illegitimate" mean. Is it worse than existing corruption and hyperinflation african nations have already been plagued by. What if crypto's "illegitimacy" were a higher standard than conventional financial options.
I've expressed this ideology a couple of times already, using "African giants" Nigeria as a case study cause I understand her present economic, security, social etc problems, I find it actually nonsensical that a country like Nigeria placed a ban on crypto, don't get me wrong, I know quite a few other countries are doing the same thing, but many of them do not have even half the problems Nigeria has, China for example are cracking down on crypto to assert their dominance in years to come, their economy is doing pretty well, they basically don't want their citizens controlling their funds, they want all the control to themselves and of course we can understand that cause their government is a dictatorial one.
Having said that, I'm not making excuses for China or other bigger nations to have issued one sanction, ban or restrictions on Bitcoin or the other, they are really selfish in doing so; but in Africa the case is different, in Nigeria for example, the government do not really have any worthwhile plan in solving most of the issues plaguing the nation, one being unemployment, I think that's enough reason for the government to allow crypto to thrive, so people can actually see what they make of it, whilst they focus on more pressing economic issues, it's basically just a sign of the government being clueless and just an attempt to blindly follow the bandwagon.