Topic: AI assistants in workplace (Read 135 times)

Based on my experience, if you tried to use it with android you will now notice they made an update which is they added the Gemini that assists you from the Google assistance they shifted into this AI because its the trend, if you are in the corporate world one of the most product they are using in the company is the Microsoft edge and for sure you daily makes an encounter with their Copilot these AI helps you with your concerns easily because you don't need to open a tab to search for the tool you want just raise the concern and they are now approach the details needed. Regarding the chatGPT most likely this used before as one of the first AI trends so people keep an engagement here even the developers most likely use this platform now tons of AI rise up to help is it depends on the efficiency and how they affect our productivity.

Artificial intelligence is fast becoming a house hold name in the world as it use is becoming popular and so is the awareness level of artificial intelligence increasing and when it comes to the working environment artificial intelligence haa started gaining weight in the the office space as the use of A.I in the working space is one thing that has increased significantly over the years as of today there is no office that you will visit without that office making use of one A.I or the other because A.I has be proven to be helpful to many in the working environment


There are actually many A.I that has been developed to make sure that the energy man uses in doing a work is reduced to the bearest minimum especially in those in the academic field doing research is now much better because there are a lot of A.I such as chartGBt which has really help in that purpose

Thanks for insights NeuroticFish i guess I'll skip Venice.ai then.

As for Perplexity I was pleasantly surprised, it gave me good results for my prompts where I asked it for lists of some mechanical parts. I also liked that it gives exact sources of information (webpage, catalogue ...) so I could check mysrlf if I find the source relevant.

But to be honest I used it as advanced search engine and didn't ask it for "creative" prompts such as composing emails or writing songs.

since It's open sourced, other GPU cloud provider can just offer their service, the problem is on the API where deepseek store data in PRC, but overall the deepseek LLM model can be run by anyone. I think eventually we will see some company offering deepseek API at competitive price as well to compete against deepseek's own services, that the beauty of open source.


yeah it's just another more capable AI replacing the old AI at this point, pretty ironic, but that's just how it is, a more efficient thing replacing lesser efficient thing.

I too just tested ChatGPT so far but since last Monday DeepSeek has taken over internet and is now a must try app. It's hot download on Play store and app store. It's interesting to see that how two super power i.e. China and USA are competing in technology and both are trying there best to gain supremacy in technology. President Trump said that it's a wake up call for USA tech companies. This is also an indication that how unpredictable technology is and coming era we might continue to see such shocking news. The downfall of Nvidia stock tells the story that human mind is more sharp then technology and is still capable of replacing through innovation.    

Although I've played quite a lot with various AI tools, I was not allowed to use "any" in the environment from work. Of course, I was allowed to use MS Copilot, but not much of others. Take this also as a warning: I have a feeling that the AI tools are more focused nowadays more on getting information than giving it, be aware of this and be very careful on what you actually give them.

I'll add that Copilot was, last time I've checked, actually ChatGPT, maybe an older version and maybe a bit customized.
It's not bad, it's also not great. Sometimes is incredibly helpful, next second it's incredibly wrong (but comes with such credible stories around its incorrect info, it can too easily and too badly mislead you). Still, I've seen worse, see below.


* Copilot: not too bad. Let's say an 7 or 8 (of 10).

* ChatGPT: didn't use much, however Copilot is supposed to be a ChatGPT. So I'll also give it a "not too bad".

* Grok: used it very little, but for now I'm pleasantly surprised. I may have been luck though.

* DeepSeek: I'll add here DeepThink together with DeepSeek. I've used it too little to say much, but it looks impressive and it offers a lot of context. For now it's a really strong competitor for Copilot.

* Gemini: I've used it enough to have an overview: I've got significantly more wrong answers than good ones from Gemini. It botched even 6th grade math. Lately it has improved a bit. 3/10

* Venice.ai: it's missing from your list, but I've given it a try because I've seen it overly advertised on crypto twitter... and it was an utter waste of time. I didn't use it much, but it is the negative record breaker: it managed to give incorrect answer to almost everything I've asked. Of course, I've given it up. 1/10

* Perplexity: I've used it exactly once, I consider that insufficient to say anything about it.

The rest of them I don't know.

Part of the problems with the other AI is that its quality is lowered in many cases for free users. Ironically, the architect behind the AI maybe a free user who couldn't be controlled or was independent minded, so was denied credit or compensation for his/her work.
It's quite similar here in crypto space, the real architect behind cryptocurrency, or the ones that massively improved on it, who were the minds behind things like nft, DEFI, etc can not afford to enjoy the "best" of services it offers, like the newcomers with lots of interest in making money. It's an example of how capitalism could be weaponized against people who do not live up to the desired standard of the matrix.

In regards to the part on non-AI users becoming unproductive, well I believe an exceptionally/extraordinarily "intelligent" people will always be more productive than AI because the intelligence is natural or supernatural, which is better than artificial intelligence. Intelligence only become ineffective or weak when it diminishes in quantity/quality or when unused  which is part of the reasons for the demand for AI.
So, I would say that  AI will eventually become more intelligent than over 95% of humans mainly due to the diminishing natural intelligence. But, it's not going to be for their own good unless AI is well made and controlled by good information.

Indeed, people that use AI in different sectors of their work tend to be more productive. Like Meta AI in WhatsApp, you can ask it questions, get clarity very fast. You can even tell it to give you sources, that way you can trace it to the internet to verify something you would sit down and think about for hours. You can just tell these AI tools t brainstorming ideas with you, and before you know it, you're progressing with your tasks.

You can ask them for faster ways to do this to get result, and they will give you ideas and everything that you can infuse with your own ideas, and you'll see yourself moving fast. So, yes, I do appreciate these AI tools but they still have negative effects. The fact that it affects peoples creativity, sometimes you feel you can't think for yourself, and for the younger generation, it's not really helping them with reading hardcopy books because everything is at the tip of their fingers.

But I hope we use AI as the tool they are and not displace our natural intelligence or our human workforce. These AI tools are programmed; they can't think for themselves, and they definitely can't do everything.

i tested only chatgpt but i am not regular user of those ai assistant, if still i did not use deepseek so i don't enough about it,
but deepseek is top application in the apple store, even it's big impacted in the stock market, $500 billion decreased in nvidia, it was big loses in stock market history in a day.

Having AI assistants in the workplace is cheaper now, especially since DeepSeek is cheaper and is open-source. It would bring more competition towards the AI that is with the current market. The different AI choices that you have, like Copilot, is quite expensive but is integrated in the M365 network, so it's very helpful when it comes to work. I believe that it's definitely beneficial to have it. I just hope that it would be cheaper now that there's competition to it.

Surprisingly Deepseek was produced with far less than the amount most US-based AI companies spend on their products. Glad to know that it was very productive because we really need competition in the sector.

I am not a fan of these AI tools but I have tried only ChatGpt. Although it was helpful I am not comfortable with it because it could limit creativity and hardwork.

Integrating AI tools into an organizational task can save time and resources. It could also lead to fast and more accurate services. Hence I think using AI assistants could increase productivity.

It depends, though I'm just seeing some of the ai for the very first time, and I'm not even sure of how accurate they are. The only one I know of is the Open ai, which I think is a bit productive for developers, because I do communicate with it while working on few occasions. While I have been seeing lots of discussions about (deepkseek) on X(Twitter). I heard it is far smarter, or should I say efficient than others, but I will have to see that for myself.


In as much as AI has been really helpful, especially for developers which I can tell, I think it will still have some consequences. The more people starts depending on AI, the lesser their personal efforts and use of IQ. Though, people who uses these AI will still be productive and deliver good work, but it won't be as a result of their personal efforts.

Just use whichever if it was just general stuff really. If you can realize chatgpt has some wrong answers then just ask them with better prompts. They usually give out the right answers after a couple of tries. Personally though I like Claude AI far more than Chatgpt or copilot, it has a better response for most of my questions as well as properly formatted ones that I really like.

And in terms of productiveness, I reckon it depends? I mean AI can be helpful yes, but if you decide to use them and it fucks up somehow, you have to fix that mess. That's a whole nother rabit hole imo and as a dev, I've done it quite a bit.

Thanks for the insight, haven't tested Claude yet, I have small coding project and I'll try to use Claude for it and see the result. I already have working solution with ChatGPT but I think it could be better, it seems like it don't understand when I try to change looks of the interface web page.


Haven't tried Meta AI yet but I heard they have plans for big investments. I'll add it to my list, thanks.

DeepSeek is not yet widely known but it has potential to push ChatGPT out of first place.


AI will and for some sectors it already started to have huge impact. I wanted to map out all the use cases and see opinions of others so I guess Economics section is ok for that.

Regarding Copilot I'm not very impressed either, like ChatGPT it gives a lot of general answers. For more technical prompts DeepSeek gave me best answers so far, but haven't tested all of AI's on the list.

OP, does this topic have anything to do with Economics? Maybe you should move it to another forum.
I've used Microsoft Copilot(because I use Microsoft Edge as my main browser) and I'm not that impressed. Copilot gave me lots of generic answers with not so accurate information. Maybe it's my fault, because I wasn't sending the best prompts.
There's a lot of hype around Deepseek on social media, mostly because it's truly open source and it was built with way lower cost and way less resources. I haven't used it yet, maybe I should try it soon.
I've also used ChatGPT-4, but I thought that Copilot is also built around ChatGPT, so using Copilot and ChatGPT at the same time doesn't make any sense(or maybe I'm wrong about this).

Deep Seek is pretty impressive, in fact it's mopping floors with other AI's now. Even if you don't trust China behind it, it's technically open source as well.

People have already bypassed censorship, but i am guessing those loopholes will be fixed as soon as CCP knows about them.

And quite ironic that AI is supposed to take our jobs in the future, but it started by take a jobs of other AI's

deepseek recently started trending for the past few days. It came as a surprise to me when i always stumble across it on social media only for me to download it and it works absolutely well like they it was advertised. What we get to see now is improvement of technology. The first internet AI that came out like Chatgpt and others builded a strong background route and base for any other AI company to follow. What the new AI companies do now is to increase the efficiency and technicality which other AI lacks.

I hear its an open source but i am not 100% sure because there have been some argument on that.

My AI experience so far shows that the ChatGPT of a thing is even overrated, I've found the needed satisfaction with better AIs than it, especially the Meta AI that is less talked about. Well, I only used the free version of the ChatGPT, the paid version may serve people more, who cares!

The Deepseek launch has taken the internet by surprise since last week and I think it's time for me to start testing it and see the one I will make my preference.

Image creation.

i have not heard of deepseek and i can bet not a lot of people has too

the thing is chatgpt has become so engraved in people's minds that it has become associated to ai when people want to talk about ai often they end up saying chatgpt it is probably the #1 ai service in the world right now so i would be surprised to see any other ai tech providers to emerge higher than chatgpt though i suppose it is possible but only if they do something so unique that chatgpt can't do which is not a lot

already tested deep seek and it's good, the fact that the API cost is so cheap will put it way ahead in front of another but I expect other AI to catch up as well since deepseek is opensourced, other company can just replicate, though I havent' used deepseek for AI assistant and still stick to chatGPT.

completely depend on the task that you're gonna do, each AI have its own edge on certain category, not every AI is all rounded, as for coding, deepseek's AI train of thought is good, but claude is better for people who knows more about technicality I guess.