Specific reasons for censoring AI generated posts may vary depending on the specific forum and its rules and policies. For example, someone can argue that such posts are spammy, zero or low value, misleading, etc... Btw, it's important to note that AI-generated content is not universally accepted on the Internet. In fact, sites like Reddit have specific rules in place to prohibit the use of such content.
My point is that that post is no worse than many of the ones we see out there in terms of low value or spammy, and that the fact that it is written by an AI should not be enough to delete it, considering that there is nothing about it in the unofficcial rules and even more thinking that the OP has made it clear that it is written by an AI.
And, how do you see this kind of discussion related to Gambling?
I want to point out that the topic of AI-generated content was created in the gambling section, but you are discussing the quality and accuracy of AI-generated content. That discussion is not related to gambling and might be more suitable for a different forum board.
The one we are having here has nothing to do with gambling, the one over there does, because they are talking about supposed ways of winning in gambling.
the post has been reported, we are waiting for the decision of the mods.
Can I know the reason? (low value, spam, etc). Btw I see it's been locked.
It would be interesting if we could find some unique pattern that would indicate that behind such posts is not a human but an AI.
I have seen many such posts on other sites and they have in common that they are rather generic and too formally structured, like, point 1, point 2, summary, conclusion, something like that.
