As for the malware examples; not sure whether there was an attack already, but if there was none so far, it's easy to understand how the attack surface is smaller when you're not physically attached but merely exchange QR codes. Also just because an attack was not carried out yet, doesn't mean it's not possible. That's why we migrate to secure encryption schemes before quantum computing is able to break RSA and not after it will have happened, for example.in case it's not clear, airgap has nothing to do with quantum computing or breaking asymmetric encryption
That's the whole point of air gap: a gap of air between your hardware wallet and your online device which publishes the signed transaction. This highly minimizes the attack surface.
@dkbit98: thanks for this topic, I really enjoy these 'wallet lists'! Always great to have them bookmarked and check from time to time to see what's available.
Suggestion: add next to each device an info on the type of airgap it uses: QR/Cameras, SD cards, etc.... (not sure of other ways).
For me, it seems way better to have the QR Code + camera way because on one hand I feel plugging an SD card in, bears potential risk as well (see viruses that spread via USB sticks..) and also because if you have a QR + camera type wallet, you can use it with any PC or phone which has a webcam. This is one limitation of USB wallets that really bugs me; they don't work on iOS. And I will certainly not use a HW wallet that communicates over Bluetooth either..