Or any other altcoin from the top 10. Technically, it is just a matter of personal preferences ("there can be only one") and nothing more. Bitcoin is as speculative as any altcoin out there. So if these preferences change one day, some altcoin will get pumped instead of Bitcoin, and Bitcoin will be stagnating or even going down. Litecoin and its price dynamics prove exactly that
And at its recent highs, it made like 600% gain (from some 22 dollars all the way up to over 140). But what's more intriguing in the context of this opinion piece is the fact it can easily get there again, in a couple of weeks or so. Also, I didn't quite like OP referring to or insinuating Ethereum as scam, which instantly discredits the whole article
Yes. Bitcoin is not very different from Litecoin. Wait... that is not the right order. "Litecoin is not very different from Bitcoin" sounds better. Bitcoin was invented in 2008 and was first mined in 2009. Litecoin came in to existence three years after that, and there is hardly any difference between these two coins as far as the logic and usage is concerned. But the most important fact to remember here is that Bitcoin was an original innovation, while Litecoin is a copycat. Now tell me why anyone should invest in a copycat while discarding the original?
Define invest here
If by investment and investors you actually mean speculation and profiteers, these folks don't care what asset to invest in as long as it gives them enough opportunity to earn dough. Litecoin fits this scheme perfectly which you seem to admit and agree with in the second half of your reply. The point is, both Bitcoin and Litecoin are speculative assets, so there is not much difference between the original and the copycat in this regard. And while you are busy defining the invest thing, also don't neglect to define "the most promising coin" thing as well since different people may have very different ideas on what a coin may "promise" them (and how much, for that matter)