I've been looking into Dragonchain, It's from Disney (so I can trust) and they seem pretty legit, very promising project and platform (not just another "altcoin") ICO starts OCT 2nd.
I'll drop some links for how's interested..
Website: https://dragonchain.com/#join-ico
WhitePaper: https://dragonchain.com/assets/Dragonchain_Business_Summary.pdf
FAQ: https://dragonchain.com/faq
Topic: Alot of ICOs around, which one is scam free? - page 3. (Read 3358 times)
Lots of scam... But if you check carefully, you'll see that there are also many good and useful projects. Like Anryze! For me it's the most promising one. Btw tokensale is going right now!!! Don't miss it)
Anryze is good project, I've heard they almost raised soft cap
Lots of scam... But if you check carefully, you'll see that there are also many good and useful projects. Like Anryze! For me it's the most promising one. Btw tokensale is going right now!!! Don't miss it)
Electroneum should be a good ICO this month with support from Duncan Logan
It is a very interesting market, as a newbie it is very discouraging when people are saying there are a lot of scams, how do you decide which is a good coin / token and which is a bad one?
Anyone got 5 solid tips to look for?
Anyone got 5 solid tips to look for?
yes it is true that many ICO are deceptive and unhealthy.
everyone can recommend to you. but you are the determinant of that choice.
I just want to convey, before you dive for investment. you should study and observe about ico beam.
before you get stuck at a loss.
I suggest do not be reckless in investing ICO. we have to do things and consider many aspects. so we can get a wiser decision to invest in ICO.
Make sure the team has demonstrable software to prove that they can actually develop.
Most ICOs have nothing to show in this regard. Some have code at Github but it's meaningless if you cannot run the software to see how good or useful it is.
If they cannot prove that they can develop software, then the team members' fancy titles, bios or CVs are meaningless at best, fraudulent at worst.
Most ICOs have nothing to show in this regard. Some have code at Github but it's meaningless if you cannot run the software to see how good or useful it is.
If they cannot prove that they can develop software, then the team members' fancy titles, bios or CVs are meaningless at best, fraudulent at worst.
I really agree with you. most of ico is nonsense. not proving that they can develop. and need to be careful to choose ico.
I think it's cindikator, they have a great team and already have developments with a large Deposit for the future!
The only way to know a scam-free ICO is to lurk more, see the different projects and learn which types succeed in the end. Recommendations from users are better than nothing, but how do you know that they are not duped too.
Yeah that's true! you can never found out if that ICO is a scam or not in the first place, just be very careful and do research first of who is the man and team behind that ICO.
eth smart contract also works like escrow if you are interested to invest.
The only way to know a scam-free ICO is to lurk more, see the different projects and learn which types succeed in the end. Recommendations from users are better than nothing, but how do you know that they are not duped too.
Yeah that's true! you can never found out if that ICO is a scam or not in the first place, just be very careful and do research first of who is the man and team behind that ICO.
The only way to know a scam-free ICO is to lurk more, see the different projects and learn which types succeed in the end. Recommendations from users are better than nothing, but how do you know that they are not duped too.
90 percent of them are designed to make the devs as much money with as little development as possible.
Just my honest opinion.
It's more than ninety percent. Some experts would say 99%.Just my honest opinion.
Ask yourself, how many of these projects have delivered a working product, with at least 1 million users?
No such projects have delivered a working product with 1 million users that ever existed. Most ICO today are design to make developers rich. They are only good on enticing investors with their product at the start. But once they collected large amount of money they discontinue developing and improving their product.
90 percent of them are designed to make the devs as much money with as little development as possible.
Just my honest opinion.
It's more than ninety percent. Some experts would say 99%.Just my honest opinion.
Ask yourself, how many of these projects have delivered a working product, with at least 1 million users?
No such projects have delivered a working product with 1 million users that ever existed. Most ICO today are design to make developers rich. They are only good on enticing investors with their product at the start. But once they collected large amount of money they discontinue developing and improving their product.
90 percent of them are designed to make the devs as much money with as little development as possible.
Just my honest opinion.
It's more than ninety percent. Some experts would say 99%.Just my honest opinion.
Ask yourself, how many of these projects have delivered a working product, with at least 1 million users?
Corruption is part of the culture of many countries. Therefore, you should check the corruption ranking of countries:
https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016
If the ICO is from a country with lots of corruption, then you know you're taking a higher risk. This is because the team probably has less of an issue with exaggerating, lying or cheating, because these things are more ingrained in their country's culture.
90 percent of them are designed to make the devs as much money with as little development as possible.
Just my honest opinion.
Just my honest opinion.
Make sure the team has demonstrable software to prove that they can actually develop.
Most ICOs have nothing to show in this regard. Some have code at Github but it's meaningless if you cannot run the software to see how good or useful it is.
If they cannot prove that they can develop software, then the team members' fancy titles, bios or CVs are meaningless at best, fraudulent at worst.
Most ICOs have nothing to show in this regard. Some have code at Github but it's meaningless if you cannot run the software to see how good or useful it is.
If they cannot prove that they can develop software, then the team members' fancy titles, bios or CVs are meaningless at best, fraudulent at worst.
Every ICO I look every day looks more and more like a scam. All kinds of amateurs creating theses things...
I don't know how this became a multi billion dollars market, but it will end badly.
I don't know how this became a multi billion dollars market, but it will end badly.
Well we have existing proof of concepts.
Check us out here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annico-live-hometoken-tokenized-real-estate-fund-in-emerging-asia-2059748 !
No fancy graphics, just real assets.
A lot of ICOs look dodgy but still managed to raise millions.
Check us out here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annico-live-hometoken-tokenized-real-estate-fund-in-emerging-asia-2059748 !
No fancy graphics, just real assets.
A lot of ICOs look dodgy but still managed to raise millions.
Jump to: