Pages:
Author

Topic: Alright, we roughly doubled before the block reward adjustment. (Read 3224 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
Bulls, you have it, we roughly doubled since we had a stable price for a few months now. I can follow the argument that the halving of the block reward would double the price.

We are there now, explain to me, why should we go further up?
No arguments about market irrationality, bubbles and so on, just pure fundamental base price.

Why does it matter why it went up or down? It's just speculation. Look it up in the dictionary.



LOL
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
Kupsi compare cumulative and non-cumulative versions, and then please stop posting here.
I can stop posting, but you are wrong Smiley
aq
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Its about the inflow of fiat into Bitcoin. pirate was able to counter this for a few months, but in the last 2 month the inflow is too high for him to constantly keep the price at $5. So we ended up around $10. If the inflow stays as high as it was, we will see even higher prices in the months to come.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1491
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Bulls, you have it, we roughly doubled since we had a stable price for a few months now. I can follow the argument that the halving of the block reward would double the price.

We are there now, explain to me, why should we go further up?
No arguments about market irrationality, bubbles and so on, just pure fundamental base price.

Why does it matter why it went up or down? It's just speculation. Look it up in the dictionary.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
We are there now, explain to me, why should we go further up?

we shouldn't. I've turned bear.

Quote
No arguments about market irrationality, bubbles and so on, just pure fundamental base price.

market is market, irrational or otherwise. Market price is the fundamental base price. There is no magical price underlying bitcoin. I'm not sure what you are demanding here.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1000
Since the OP demands that we give "fundamental" reasons why the price should go any higher, it seems fair to ask the OP to give "fundamental" reasons why BTC was fairly valued at $5 independently of the reward drop. The only reason given is that price was stable around for $5 for a while, which is a point about price action, not a point about fundamentals.

Another way to put my point is this: maybe price will go higher from here because it was already undervalued at $5 independently of the reward drop. The fact that it was stable for a while at $5 does not show that it was fairly valued at that price on a fundamental basis, or that it would have stayed at that price without the reward drop.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
Kupsi compare cumulative and non-cumulative versions, and then please stop posting here.

My point is just that no one knows when the pressure of the decreasing reward will have it's effect. It's been known about since the very beginning and in fact the decreasing reward (synonymous with limited number ever issued) is a main reason why anyone holds coins so to a large extent it is baked in since the beginning. If there are many 'unthinking' users who just buy what they need before they go shopping then we'll see a change because of them after the reward halves because they'll just keep buying the same dollar amount into a more limited supply.

So I can't really tell anything useful. I'm just saying that the two sort of effects are 1. Since the beginning. 2. Starting at the halving. And I've seen no reason to specially consider some arbitrary period in the middle.

Of course that is the case. I've been telling people that the price is more representative for all block reward adjustments already factored in.
People insist on the opposite, hence this thread.

Ah ok.

Like I said I do think there is an element of it that will have an effect only after the drop. And different traders theories will cause them to make extreme moves at various times shortly before and after the drop, but I think the only periods with -real- (in some sense) effects are Always and After The Drop.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
Kupsi compare cumulative and non-cumulative versions, and then please stop posting here.

My point is just that no one knows when the pressure of the decreasing reward will have it's effect. It's been known about since the very beginning and in fact the decreasing reward (synonymous with limited number ever issued) is a main reason why anyone holds coins so to a large extent it is baked in since the beginning. If there are many 'unthinking' users who just buy what they need before they go shopping then we'll see a change because of them after the reward halves because they'll just keep buying the same dollar amount into a more limited supply.

So I can't really tell anything useful. I'm just saying that the two sort of effects are 1. Since the beginning. 2. Starting at the halving. And I've seen no reason to specially consider some arbitrary period in the middle.

Of course that is the case. I've been telling people that the price is more representative for all block reward adjustments already factored in.
People insist on the opposite, hence this thread.
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
Do it with more coins.
That doesn't help in the long run. I think you should read up on this  Cheesy

It does matter now.
Bitcoin days destroyd has been increasing for 2.5 years. You can't manipulate that!
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
Send coins to a new wallet. Again please read up on that issue.
That don't increase bitcoin days destroyd. You can send 1 BTC 1,000,000 times a day and it's still 1 bitcoin day destroyd.

Do it with more coins.

How long have you been here? We've done a lot more than double during the 50BTC reward period.

I was referring to the last stable period.

My point is just that no one knows when the pressure of the decreasing reward will have it's effect. It's been known about since the very beginning and in fact the decreasing reward (synonymous with limited number ever issued) is a main reason why anyone holds coins so to a large extent it is baked in since the beginning. If there are many 'unthinking' users who just buy what they need before they go shopping then we'll see a change because of them after the reward halves because they'll just keep buying the same dollar amount into a more limited supply.

So I can't really tell anything useful. I'm just saying that the two sort of effects are 1. Since the beginning. 2. Starting at the halving. And I've seen no reason to specially consider some arbitrary period in the middle.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
Do it with more coins.
That doesn't help in the long run. I think you should read up on this  Cheesy

It does matter now.
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
Do it with more coins.
That doesn't help in the long run. I think you should read up on this  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
Send coins to a new wallet. Again please read up on that issue.
That don't increase bitcoin days destroyd. You can send 1 BTC 1,000,000 times a day and it's still 1 bitcoin day destroyd.

Do it with more coins.

How long have you been here? We've done a lot more than double during the 50BTC reward period.

I was referring to the last stable period.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
How long have you been here? We've done a lot more than double during the 50BTC reward period.
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
Send coins to a new wallet. Again please read up on that issue.
That don't increase bitcoin days destroyd. You can send 1 BTC 1,000,000 times a day and it's still 1 bitcoin day destroyd.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
Send coins to a new wallet. Again please read up on that issue.

It may be possible to use the total transaction fees as a representative figure some day when BTC is large enough.
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
First transactions involve two parties.

So?

Second those charts are so easy to manipulate it is best not to consider them as representative to judge economical development.

How do you manipulate bitcoin days destroyd?
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
@Kupsi, you ever played satoshidice?
I'm not going to get in an argument about blockchain statistics with you, if you believe they have representative information do that, but don't bother somebody else with it.
I suggest you read up on them, there is plenty of information in the wiki and the forum.
Nope, because I don't like to gamble if I don't have an edge.

But the first chart, Number of transactions excluding popular addresses, exclude the SatoshiDice transactions.

First transactions involve two parties. Second those charts are so easy to manipulate it is best not to consider them as representative to judge economical development.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
@SkRRJyTC, you don't know what a International Bank Account Number is?

No sorry.
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
@Kupsi, you ever played satoshidice?
I'm not going to get in an argument about blockchain statistics with you, if you believe they have representative information do that, but don't bother somebody else with it.
I suggest you read up on them, there is plenty of information in the wiki and the forum.
Nope, because I don't like to gamble if I don't have an edge.

But the first chart, Number of transactions excluding popular addresses, exclude the SatoshiDice transactions.
Pages:
Jump to: