member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Many of these proposed features can be automated. Some may be easy to implement--even retrofit into existing, ailing coins--while others may later prove impractical or impossible.
What if the Block Chain "owned" some IT assets, like domain names, websites, files, photos, creative content, digital copyrights, other altcoins, Bitcoins, rights to music, books, etc. They wouldn't have to be worth much, but if they could be sold to recover tokens and take them out of circulation, then you'd have a stable value. Detecting a surplus of coins and a decline in price, assets could be sold to buy back Tokens on the market, thereby matching supply and demand. Better yet, the Token Block Chain's reserve could be used to buy shares in websites that agree to accept Tokens for online purchases. When inflation hit, shares in those companies could be put up for sale to lock Tokens back into the Reserve, taking them out of circulation. At the same time, offers to buy shares with Tokens in exchange for expanding people's options to spend Tokens increases the underlying value of them. In any case, dividends from many different Bitcoin/Litecoin companies would provide the slow income that takes extra Tokens out of circulation over time.
More dubious and much more difficult to implement (similar to the Federal Reserve's prime rate), either the Block Chain or the Token Foundation (like the Bitcoin Foundation, but managing a 2-3% premine) could offer a variable-rate interest loans (Borrowed Tokens) to exchanges, ecommerce sites, and companies that agree to accept the new altcoin for purchases. If the price of the Token declines, you raise the interest rate on each Token lent out, which is accomplished by reducing the value of each lent "Borrowed Token" inside the BlockChain itself to cover interest. That is to say that a Borrowed Token (as opposed to a Purchased Token) might be lent out at 2-10 mil variable (0.2% to 1.0% per month). When inflation picks up, so does the Interest Rate and the value of the Purchased Token declines, those with Borrowed Tokens then see an increase in the variable rate, losing 3 or 4 mils per month from their Borrowed Tokens until prices stabilize. In that way, those needing loans to expand eCommerce and other activities can gain access to inexpensive credit, while the Purchased Tokens do not change in value. (Any part of the loan can be repaid at any time with one regular Token, plus the "Interest".)
InfiniteCoin has no limit to the number of blocks that could be added. Others have a fixed limit. Perhaps another solution to volatility could be found in raising/lowering the final production amount daily according to market demand. If one is trying to set the Token's value at one 2013 dollar, if market capitalization shrinks from $12 million to $10 million (a $1 Token is now worth 83 cents), then the final limit on the number of coins mined shrinks from 12 million to 10 million, while mining rewards are suspended. However, if there's a surge in demand, increasing market cap suddenly to 13 million, miners are given the go ahead to begin mining (minting) new coins, while the total limit is raised automatically to 13 million. In addition to "stopping the printing presses" until current demand catches up, the total number of coins minted can never be allowed by the network to exceed either current or anticipated demand.