Topic: Always look at the coins MAX supply - page 6. (Read 1034 times)
I think this max supply issue is vice versa, I've seen few not so good crypto projects with big max supply, looking at the project use case you can easily figure out that the big max supply doesn't make any sense, developers should start looking at use cases closely before releasing big max supply. Most projects don't need big max supply
That's just a small aspect, max supply is not the main factor to decide price of a coin. It depends on many things and main factor is the usages of it, its applications. In term of investment, large max supply coin surge less than small supply coin but with large max supply coin you can buy more coins than small supply coin with the same amount of money, so the profit you get will not be different.
Actually it pretty much is the main factor, because the market cap is possibly distributed with that max supply. It show how much the value can be distributed and diluted.
So there's 6000+ coins out there. Look at the max supply. A coin with a large max supply and rapid emission of new coins will most likely never surge in value. This is because the worlds total capital is divided with so many optional coins. The larger the supply, the more capital it needs to spike in value. Even Bitcoin with a max supply of only 21 million needed massive amount of capital to get where it is now. So any coin with double that, will need the double amount of capital to get to the same place. So with so many options out there if you want good value pump. Look for something with max supply of only like 1 million. (which of course needs to have a utility too to stay in growing demand)
I do but not after I looked in their roadmap, their platform and people behind the team, the supply is the least of my concern even if the supply only has 10 million, but if the project can turn out to be useless, usage should be the high priority it is something that defines the project, two examples mentioned by others are Ripple, Ethereum and Doge
That's just a small aspect, max supply is not the main factor to decide price of a coin. It depends on many things and main factor is the usages of it, its applications. In term of investment, large max supply coin surge less than small supply coin but with large max supply coin you can buy more coins than small supply coin with the same amount of money, so the profit you get will not be different.
I'm not interested in max supply, it doesn't stand close to what real use case can do, max supply my foot, low max supply did not guarantee success of a project, what matters is the power of demand, hardwork and dedication of the team is all im interested in
I can relate with your point mate. In this case the main concern should be on the use case. How much the maximum supply will not give a lot of impact as long as it doesn't have a lot of portion that will go to the dev as the premined coin
The result of their developer can also be a good point.
So you are saying that all coins/tokens with small supply will have a huge value cause its easy to insert capital funds on it? Whether its small or big supply as long as the demand is high this is nothing. A coin will surge no matter what its supply. Take a look on xrp, the supply is so huge but it still able to be considered as big marketcap not mentioning the infinitie supply of eth? Its all about the law of demand and supply. Actually you have a point but not all will believe thats this is the only reason for a coin to increase its value.
I agree with you, the top 2 coins in the market Xrp and Eth has a huge supply but that doesn't stop them from landing in the top 5, it's not the supply but the demand and the platform that a coin can give to the community in short usage, people are checking the supply but they are looking more in the road map and whitepaper and what it can offer to the community
Yeah there's a huge demand for those projects but because they have such a large max supply there is not much volatility. This is exactly what I'm trying to say.
The old me always thought that it's all about the supply of tokens and coins but later I realized that I was wrong, demanding tokens will always keep surging no matter how big their max supply is, it's why I look before taking risk on any new altcoins this days, I always make sure that utility comes first
It depends also on the emission rate of new coins. The more rapid the emission, the more it will distribute the total value and flatten the curve.
The old me always thought that it's all about the supply of tokens and coins but later I realized that I was wrong, demanding tokens will always keep surging no matter how big their max supply is, it's why I look before taking risk on any new altcoins this days, I always make sure that utility comes first
I agree the max supply affects the increase in the price of coins. But demand plays a more important role. With high demand, of course the price
of coins is definitely a pump. Then the smaller the max supply will make the coins circulation a little, then making coins more expensive. There
is also a small max supply but the price does not rise, because there is no demand.
of coins is definitely a pump. Then the smaller the max supply will make the coins circulation a little, then making coins more expensive. There
is also a small max supply but the price does not rise, because there is no demand.
If the coin has no good use case that's needed in blockchain technology it won't do any good even if the max supply are in thousands, many projects in crypto space have useless use cases that shouldn't exist on the blockchain that's why they failed to have value
If use case is not good enough then you have to worry about max supply, you can burn off max supply but still this won't give your token good value, all you need to do in bring in new features that will attract investors, I'm sick and tired of too many useless tokens in crypto space today
Yeah most probably, but burning never help some coins who go through the process to attain a good price, I think the emphasis should be more on utility, this is lacking in 90% of projects we have, when there is no utility the liquidity will also be poor, and what is the essence of having so many different tokens that can not provide service through blockchain!
Hence, a project with no actual use case have no business minting a huge so supply, better to have a reasonable supply to prevent the token to appear useless.
So there's 6000+ coins out there. Look at the max supply. A coin with a large max supply and rapid emission of new coins will most likely never surge in value. This is because the worlds total capital is divided with so many optional coins. The larger the supply, the more capital it needs to spike in value. Even Bitcoin with a max supply of only 21 million needed massive amount of capital to get where it is now. So any coin with double that, will need the double amount of capital to get to the same place. So with so many options out there if you want good value pump. Look for something with max supply of only like 1 million. (which of course needs to have a utility too to stay in growing demand)
How in terms of price, I think the supply must be adjusted to the value, if possible 24h volume calculation is also noticed. In my opinion, just looking at it in terms of supply is not very helpful, whereas we know that the market in the crypto industry has demand that is much different in traditional markets in general. Why did I say that? because we do not know for sure when there is a surge in demand and where there is a surge, even there is also the possibility of a coin that has a supply of more than 1 millions has a higher demand than a coin that has a supply under 1 million. 
If use case is not good enough then you have to worry about max supply, you can burn off max supply but still this won't give your token good value, all you need to do in bring in new features that will attract investors, I'm sick and tired of too many useless tokens in crypto space today
Even though you are sick and tired of too many useless tokens in the crypto room today, that doesn't mean it's a reason to leave crypto, because you also know which tokens and which are good to keep, and which tokens aren't good to have , so just live everything in accordance with the thoughts that you have formed.
Max supply aren't that important, do your own research on these few examples of mine
1. Curioinvest has total max supply of 2 million tokens and present value is 0.33$
2. ARCS project has 20 billion max supply and the present value is 0.30$ to 0.33$
3. Ripple has 99 billion max supply and the present value is 0.20$
There you have it, what makes max supply so special?? As a matter of fact they aren't, the problem that every coins solve in crypto space is what makes them valuable, better use case equals to better value, that's all.
1. Curioinvest has total max supply of 2 million tokens and present value is 0.33$
2. ARCS project has 20 billion max supply and the present value is 0.30$ to 0.33$
3. Ripple has 99 billion max supply and the present value is 0.20$
There you have it, what makes max supply so special?? As a matter of fact they aren't, the problem that every coins solve in crypto space is what makes them valuable, better use case equals to better value, that's all.
the maximum supply for a project coin certainly affects the price, look at the supply from DOGE or DENT, they are very difficult to ride high, and very easy to dump, honestly I don't like
They project devs should start burning supplies in every transactions that occur in their blockchain history in order for its value to increase overtime. But there are some cases that massive total amount of supplies does not really come into play and still the prices surge up and maintain it in a high level.
If use case is not good enough then you have to worry about max supply, you can burn off max supply but still this won't give your token good value, all you need to do in bring in new features that will attract investors, I'm sick and tired of too many useless tokens in crypto space today
Only projects with shit use case will have to worry about its max supply, it's why new developers have been warned many times never to develop repetitive projects and nonsense use case projects, max supply isn't the culprit here it's lack of good use case
I'm not interested in max supply, it doesn't stand close to what real use case can do, max supply my foot, low max supply did not guarantee success of a project, what matters is the power of demand, hardwork and dedication of the team is all im interested in
So you are saying that all coins/tokens with small supply will have a huge value cause its easy to insert capital funds on it? Whether its small or big supply as long as the demand is high this is nothing. A coin will surge no matter what its supply. Take a look on xrp, the supply is so huge but it still able to be considered as big marketcap not mentioning the infinitie supply of eth? Its all about the law of demand and supply. Actually you have a point but not all will believe thats this is the only reason for a coin to increase its value.
I agree with you, the top 2 coins in the market Xrp and Eth has a huge supply but that doesn't stop them from landing in the top 5, it's not the supply but the demand and the platform that a coin can give to the community in short usage, people are checking the supply but they are looking more in the road map and whitepaper and what it can offer to the community
Maximum supply has no effect if the project is good, its price value per unit will be calculated based on the demand high max supply means the price per unit will be cheaper but make sure that coin doesn't have infinite volume in that case only the coin will lose its value if coins are mined or printed by the team.
Jump to: