Topic: am I wrong ??? (Read 461 times)
If only the team right now, or in the future, decides to post bounty campaigns, that pays ethereum coin or bitcoin value, even if it has just a few but really have a value, it would help the projects coins not to dump its price.
The best option to avoid dump by hunters as they always say and think is to pay bounty hunters in btc, eth or usdt, by so doing, the bounty hunter wouldn't have anything to do with the token but my plea is that bounty hunters should be paid when due.
Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down
When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only
This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC
So... am i wrong ?
When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only
This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC
So... am i wrong ?
You are abit wrong, bounty hunters and developers are on a contract (which is the bounty campaign), after campaign is over, and payment is made, every individual is entitled to make their own decisions
which includes, hodling, selling, or buying more.
It's a free market so I should be free to do with my reward whatever and whenever I want. There is a solution against the dump of bounty rewards around already. Some projects just lock them for some time and that's it. The rest give the reward piece by piece with time. Different realization but the same meaning.
I agree! I don't know why some of the investors are blaming the bounty hunter for price dump, they always says that its because of the bounty hunter but in reality the total allocation for tokens present on bounty hunters are just less than 5% of the total token supply. They should blame things like that on huge investors isn't it ?
Honestly, the idea does not look very attractive, because everything you are talking about is quite possible to do for several accounts and KYC too!
No, you're not wrong. We, as the bounty hunters, need to be paid in the time because we have already done so many works in the period of the bounty campaign.
Bounty hunting is a voluntary thing, so if a person wants, he does, and if not, he is looking for another bounty!
Actually, the dev should know that is the risk of making a coin or token. Every people who get the rewards by token will sell the token because they need money for their life. It's not the fault of the bounty hunters because they only want to exchange their tokens into ethereum which more guarantee for them to trade or sell it into fiat or bitcoin. This is a dilemma for the dev and the dev and the teams should find out how to solve this so their tokens can stay at the high price and not getting dump after release on the market.
I think the suggestion that you say have a point too. many disposals occur and it's bad to have an impact on the coins of the ICO new entry on the market. but the deciding factor is certainly not just of it just so fix this aspect of the holder only less so right because even the bounty hunter has a role and a small allocation.
yes you are wrong from my point of view.
Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down
what can a mere 2% of all token affect the price? it's 2% divided to all participant. so think about it you own a part of 0.00008% of the token, if you sold it did it have any impact on a whole market for it's token?When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
NO. the survival of the token not guarantee by who join the bounty campaign, but it was how the team manage the project after it completed it's ICO phase. 
I am confused to hold coins longer, ICO has no protection against tokens that have been registered on the market. they focus more on developing real projects.
finally ico is a race to throw tokens.
finally ico is a race to throw tokens.
In such market like this, smart bounty hunters certainly don’t sell tokens of promising projects because they understand that tokens will have to be sold on a new wave of growth
I agree, I have now a lot of tokens left from 2017 , and they fell very well somewhere around -85% , but I think the strong will certainly survive and can give good money! 
I think a very reasonable proposal to pay no tokens project and in BTC, USD or ETH. So it is possible to keep the rate the coins from falling.
Nope.. you are wrong.
Of course it is preferably for project if bounty hunters hold tokens as longer as possible.
But, it is more important for projects with small amount of tokens sold.
And your second proposal.. not really sure that I got an idea
Of course it is preferably for project if bounty hunters hold tokens as longer as possible.
But, it is more important for projects with small amount of tokens sold.
And your second proposal.. not really sure that I got an idea
Yeh, now doing bounty isn't profitable. All projects delay token listing because of the bearish market. I think that they can re-buy bountyhunters tokens if they don't want to list tokens.
I am a bounty hunter as well and I have nothing against the token lock. Hunters that are dumping do not get that they are killing the project and nobody will get profit, besides the peanuts that the dumpers got at the beginning by selling under the ICO price.
Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down
When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only
This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC
So... am i wrong ?
When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only
This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC
So... am i wrong ?
Bounty managers or project devs would not follow your idea so it is wrong
Do you know why ?
Bounty hunting needs a lot of people, not hundreds, but atleast a thousand to spread across and market the project.
With your terms, bounty programs won’t get 100 participants overall
In such market like this, smart bounty hunters certainly don’t sell tokens of promising projects because they understand that tokens will have to be sold on a new wave of growth
OP, I just feel that might not work, because a new project that has no correlation with other past projects, would not benefit of one decides to hold others.
What if I just retain little of those previous tokens and I already sold the bulk? It does not change anything.
What I believe is that, a lot of bounty participants need a lot of orientations, as regards dumping of tokens. Then the project also has to be good and be handled by professionals, to prevent dump.
What if I just retain little of those previous tokens and I already sold the bulk? It does not change anything.
What I believe is that, a lot of bounty participants need a lot of orientations, as regards dumping of tokens. Then the project also has to be good and be handled by professionals, to prevent dump.
Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down
When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only
This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC
So... am i wrong ?
When I started to think with myself a little ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only
This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC
So... am i wrong ?
You are surely right but I don't think price only decreases when bounty hunters sell their tokens. It all depends upon market conditions. In my early days of bounty campaigns in 2017 I saw price rising like anything after bounty reward distribution, I agree price may come down temporarily after bounty selling but it does not mean it will dump. For an example Opporty tokens have not distributed bounty rewards yet but its price has depreciated like anything, so I believe it all depends upon market sentiments.
Jump to: