Topic: Amazon cheapens "e-currency" concept (Read 4223 times)

Im not suggesting these gas stations dont properly declare their income. Jus that that they could potentially avoid paying 2/3 of their net margin to VISA.

The Amazon Kindle uses DRM to replicate the memory hole in George Orwell's 1984. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html?_r=0. The use of DRM for censorship by Amazon was debuted by sending George Orwell's 1984 into the "memory hole", back in 2009. This makes the Amazon Kindle a very serious threat to freedom of expression.

Amazon Coins is a joke however the kindle is an exceptional product for what it does. Theres nothing better for reading ebooks.

I'm not sure you realize how radical an idea this is.
You don't transact petrochemicals for anything other than petrodollar$!

Businesses like petrol stations are subject to a fair bit of scrutiny.  Both taxation authorities and banks have a damned good idea of how much a service station in a particular area should be turning over and their fraud algorithms will flag the business if they go too far outside the average (if cash sales seem to high, there's a possibility to business is being used to launder money; if they're too low, there's a possibility that income is being undeclared).

Accepting Bitcoin might be more trouble than it's worth in the short term for businesses which are already regarded as somewhat high risk by conventional financial services/authorities.

A class action lawsuit for trademark infringement? There is a case to be made that Amazon coin has been designed to create confusion in the market place with Bitcoin. Take a good look and the official announcement and the golden coin. http://www.amazonappstoredev.com/2013/02/introducing-amazon-coins.html

Is this a new kind of attack on the Bitcoin ecosystem? A name based attack?

• Bitcoin's hashing and curve algorithms are secure
• the network code is sound
• 50% attacks are almost impossible
• exchanges can be hacked, but there are too many of them already
• users spread around the world, no legislative power over the whole network
• P2P, nodes can not be shut down
• can be anonymous, difficult to identify individual users
• etc. and many more...

So, what is the last resort of the system?

Create a crappy, non-functional "alternative", with similar name, to distract people from the "real-thing" and discredit the whole concept of crypto currency! If it works out, there will be lot of confusion and nobody will understand the qualitative differences between Bitcoin and those Fraud-Coins...

What could be a mitigating strategy?

Post your ideas below!!
.

If I owned a gas station I would be the first to implement this. Unfortunately, I do not. It would be easy though. Pay with bitcoins the amount you think you will need. If you click full before your coins are gone, they send the coins right back to you.

I'd move to where I could pay for gas like that. I know casascius or however his name is spelled let someone pay for gas with bitcoins but not directly to the merchant.

Yes, Gas stations.
I just read a (few years old) article where it said in the US on average gas stations pay 2x more in credit card fees as they make in net profit.  IOW, their profits could triple by accepting bitcoin . And if they sacrifice some of that to reduce prices, I dont know about the US, but here gas is mighty expensive and people actively search very hard for the cheapest gas prices, or drive quite a while. So cheap gas might be a nice incentive for them to buy some bitcoins to use at the pump.

/ot.

We are associating it with bitcoin. You guys literally flooded the whole forum with this crap.

I'm not so sure. Sheeple will hear about Amazon coin. Then when they understand its just Amazon's crappy alternative to Itunes gift cards, if they then associate it with Bitcoin.... that's not what Bitcoin is at all and I think it provides no help at all.

+1.  It's bullish when a mega-corp is poorly copying a nerdy open source currency movement.
I can almost hear the kids, "don't buy that Amazon weaksauce, you need real bitcoin!"

Well, if imitation truly is the sincerest form of flattery, I guess we should all feel quite flattered.

They are both eatable. 

Is someone really comparing bitcoin to this thing?

Next what, we will compare horses with strawberries?

You're talking about the Kindle Fire. The other Kindles are quite excellent at their intended task.

Agreed. I believe these "coins" are just "tech-scrip". Also they are a "loss leader" - they're trying to sell more consumer tablets by giving away a few bucks in credit at their store.

Is it just me or are those Swindles largely useless?  It took me 5 minutes to figure out how to just start a browser on one, I felt like I was using AOL!

//Thread over

https://twitter.com/JamesGRickards/status/299004776799166464

James Rickards... I expected more from you :/

While James should know better, in many peoples' eyes, Amazon Coins is just "one more virtual currency" alongside Bitcoin, Microsoft Points, Linden Dollars, and Facebook Credits.

This is nonsense, and I'd like to explain why Bitcoin and Amazon Coins are as different as bumble bees and blueberry muffins. They are not both virtual currencies, of the same ilk, but fundamentally separate things entirely.

1) Bitcoin is actually a currency, while Amazon Coins are just US dollar tokens, spendable only with Amazon. Amazon Coins are a proxy of the USD, meaning they are USD with a different name, not a unique currency at all. They are dollars, but less useful.

2) Amazon Coins are non-transferable. What kind of "currency" is non-transferable? Transferability should be a prerequisite for the term "currency."

3) Amazon Coins are 1-way, meaning you buy them, then you use them for stuff. You cannot resell Amazon Coins back for dollars or any other currency.

4) Amazon Coins are territory and content restricted. Only useful where Amazon permits, and only usable to buy Amazon stuff.

5) Amazon Coins offer no privacy whatsoever. They're linked to your identity via your Amazon account.

6) Amazon Coins bow down to all US regulation. The moment the US Gov says no, they will vanish.

7) You have no claim of ownership over Amazon Coins. Amazon can remove them from your account with a click of a button and they are likely never legally your property whatsoever.

Amazon Coins are not a currency in any proper sense of the term, and provide no interesting utility whatsoever. It's a marketing ploy to get customers to provide interest-free float capital to Amazon (customers buy coins, then spend them later, meaning Amazon holds that balance as capital upon which it can operate and profit). There's nothing wrong with Amazon doing this, but it's not a currency.

Amazon Coins are just Amazon Gift Cards, but they've renamed them Coins and made them less versatile.

Ironically, Amazon Coins will generally be welcomed and trumpeted by the public as a legitimate Virtual Currency while Bitcoin remains marginalized for "not being real money." But we know the public has little understanding of money in the first place, so this should come as no surprise.

//rant over

Essentially its just another one-way trapdoor token that is centralized and subject to the whim of a single corporation.

I'd run like hell away from it, personally.