AMD Ryzen 9 🖥️ 3900x RandomX mining benchmarks - page 2.

BoredAlchemist

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: sech1 on December 10, 2019, 02:01:34 AM

I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).

well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?

thefix

legendary

Activity: 1049

Merit: 1001

I finally ended up going down to a 3 GHZ clock speed on the threadripper 1950x cpu with 3400 ram speed and a gtx 1060 sitting idle. The cpu temp sits around 62-63c with a Noctua U14S and 3 low power draw case fans to make sure I have decent airflow. I am getting 8444 h/s with this setup while drawing about 185 watts at the wall and keeping temps at an acceptable level. This is not a profitable setup but it is the most efficient setup for a hobby miner with a threadripper they want to play around with and not overheat.

agente

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Quote from: toptek12 on December 10, 2019, 09:45:27 AM

I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .

Why? For 1 dollar per day? Grin

toptek12

member

Activity: 126

Merit: 10

I got a R 9 3900x up to 13.15 KH temp at 66c mining rx,it did out of the box with 3200 speed memory 11 KH so i bought some 3600 memory because of something i saw on YouTube, I'm sure i can get it up to 14 kh easy once i get a better cooler.
I also have a r 7 2700 up to 4.71 kh due to memory limits, I have some 3600 speed sticks coming.
i also have a r7 1700 that does about the same as the r7 2700

and a r7 3700x i haven't really booted up yet the motherboard board and memory is due in today.

I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .

mineshop.eu

copper member

Activity: 406

Merit: 59

Quote from: jstefanop on December 06, 2019, 01:50:20 PM

Quote from: Marvell2 on December 05, 2019, 09:42:15 AM

randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O

About 600 MH was added to the network...thats like 40k 3900x. I would say half the new hash is from existing systems mining monero since they can, so 10-20k "new" systems in farms is not that much considering 100s of thousands of ASICs on other networks.

I think it is so high cause most of the miners have CPU which are sitting idle, so it makes sence even to put on a celeron which does no harm to earn extra few cents. Still ROI is better then mining any other coin with GPU.

sech1

member

Activity: 116

Merit: 66

I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).

BoredAlchemist

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: anatolikostis on December 09, 2019, 06:04:16 PM

Quote from: BoredAlchemist on December 09, 2019, 03:46:20 PM

you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.

The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)

here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol

3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.

Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.

nice attempt to hide real scam site behind a link get-monero - but NO (cookies has been deleted)! Grin

Who do you think you are and why do you shy to link an original site (scam alert or not)?

http://get-monero.org is what i'm using as a shortner for my affiliate link for the mining pool the link is ragerX.lol which i also provided for people who do not wish to use my affiliate.

so what are you on about or do you believe no one can code a better pool or mining software then what is currently available?

anatolikostis

legendary

Activity: 2026

Merit: 1005

Quote from: BoredAlchemist on December 09, 2019, 03:46:20 PM

you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.

The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)

here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol

3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.

Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.

nice attempt to hide real scam site behind a link get-monero - but NO (cookies has been deleted)! Grin

Who do you think you are and why do you shy to link an original site (scam alert or not)?

BoredAlchemist

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.

The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)

here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol

3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.

Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.

thefix

legendary

Activity: 1049

Merit: 1001

I was able to get the hash rate up up to 9300 h/s on a threadripper 1950x with a small jump in memory speeds up from 3200 to 3333 with stock cpu settings. The heat generated even with the cpu fan running full blast seems a bit much, so I will probably run with less cores until I can get it to and acceptable level.

Metroid

sr. member

Activity: 2142

Merit: 353

Xtreme Monster

considering monero is the only popular coin that can be mined using the cpu, no wonder why so many cpus were added to the network.

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2172

Merit: 1401

Quote from: Marvell2 on December 05, 2019, 09:42:15 AM

randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O

About 600 MH was added to the network...thats like 40k 3900x. I would say half the new hash is from existing systems mining monero since they can, so 10-20k "new" systems in farms is not that much considering 100s of thousands of ASICs on other networks.

thefix

legendary

Activity: 1049

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Set Ready Go on December 06, 2019, 06:52:19 AM

Quote from: thefix on December 05, 2019, 11:39:43 AM

I am getting around 4600 h/s on RandomX with a threadripper 1950x with 32 gb of ram at 3200 in a quad channel setup. Looks like faster dual channel memory has a bigger impact than the quad channel setup.

14 threads seems to be the sweet spot

What miner are you using? I guess shouldnt really matter xmrig/xmrstak preety much same hashrate

I dont get how you can get so low hashrate, hmm have you set large pages and that miner allocate it correctly? so it shows like "JIT 1020/1020" and not "JIT 20/1020"

You should have double hashrate then what you have.

My 12 core TR1920x does 7500 h/s with 3200 cl 16 and 16gb quad channel memory (4x4)gb this @ 3,7ghz cpu and 1.15v

So yeah something strange with your setup man, if you have popped in the wrong memory slots eg A1 B1 etc etc ... Correct placement in your manual.

Also could you link your batch file with cpu affinity / threads.

If you could make a batch file in xmrig folder and do this :

Code:

@echo off
xmrig.exe, -o PoolUrl, -u YourWalletadress.Workername, -t 16, --cpu-affinity 0x55555555, --cpu-priority 5, -l, --log-file=Troubleshooting
pause

I ended up bumping up the large page files to 2048 in linux after reading the results you are getting with a 1920x and I am now getting close to 9000 h/s which is a major bump. I think I may be able to get more from what I am reading from other users by increasing the page file size with quad channel memory. Thanks for the feedback and tips, it helped me almost double my original results

Set Ready Go

member

Activity: 273

Merit: 17

Quote from: thefix on December 05, 2019, 11:39:43 AM

I am getting around 4600 h/s on RandomX with a threadripper 1950x with 32 gb of ram at 3200 in a quad channel setup. Looks like faster dual channel memory has a bigger impact than the quad channel setup.

14 threads seems to be the sweet spot

What miner are you using? I guess shouldnt really matter xmrig/xmrstak preety much same hashrate

I dont get how you can get so low hashrate, hmm have you set large pages and that miner allocate it correctly? so it shows like "JIT 1020/1020" and not "JIT 20/1020"

You should have double hashrate then what you have.

My 12 core TR1920x does 7500 h/s with 3200 cl 16 and 16gb quad channel memory (4x4)gb this @ 3,7ghz cpu and 1.15v

So yeah something strange with your setup man, if you have popped in the wrong memory slots eg A1 B1 etc etc ... Correct placement in your manual.

Also could you link your batch file with cpu affinity / threads.

If you could make a batch file in xmrig folder and do this :

Code:

@echo off
xmrig.exe, -o PoolUrl, -u YourWalletadress.Workername, -t 16, --cpu-affinity 0x55555555, --cpu-priority 5, -l, --log-file=Troubleshooting
pause

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: Marvell2 on December 05, 2019, 09:42:15 AM

randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O

I don't know. My 3 systems hashrate went up 4x with less power.
Network hashrate tripled.

thefix

legendary

Activity: 1049

Merit: 1001

I am getting around 4600 h/s on RandomX with a threadripper 1950x with 32 gb of ram at 3200 in a quad channel setup. Looks like faster dual channel memory has a bigger impact than the quad channel setup.

14 threads seems to be the sweet spot

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 04, 2019, 10:40:35 PM

Quote from: Set Ready Go on December 01, 2019, 06:14:40 PM

Quote from: lncm on December 01, 2019, 04:57:15 PM

Quote from: Set Ready Go on December 01, 2019, 04:02:06 PM

Quote from: lncm on December 01, 2019, 01:24:31 PM

Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.

Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios

Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.

It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.

Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU

So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable

i wonder how it is in the taichi x399 board.

i think i did it correctly but i am not at 6000 or 7000 with. my thread ripper 1920x. i am doing 4900-5100

which is better then the 600 i was doing. i used a different option something like cbs/cpu

If it runs, but slow, memory timings should be the problem.

I was getting 10500 with my 3900x, and after following advice here, it's now @ 13500 H/s...

marinko9

jr. member

Activity: 103

Merit: 1

Why don't you have any new RandomX miner in your shop yet? How much is some miner with a few AMD Ryzen 9 CPUs and all the other components needed to plug and play a miner and mine something?

I am not sure how profitable is it to mine Monero at all with the current difficulty 101 G.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: Set Ready Go on December 01, 2019, 06:14:40 PM

Quote from: lncm on December 01, 2019, 04:57:15 PM

Quote from: Set Ready Go on December 01, 2019, 04:02:06 PM

Quote from: lncm on December 01, 2019, 01:24:31 PM

Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.

Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios

Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.

It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.

Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU

So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable

i wonder how it is in the taichi x399 board.

i think i did it correctly but i am not at 6000 or 7000 with. my thread ripper 1920x. i am doing 4900-5100

which is better then the 600 i was doing. i used a different option something like cbs/cpu

Topic: AMD Ryzen 9 🖥️ 3900x RandomX mining benchmarks - page 2. (Read 2228 times)