Rebranding of FinMiner by nanopool
DUAL MINING with high performance with nanominer
Ethash/CryptoNight/Ubqhash + RandomHash (PASC) with high performance.
New topic has been opened here
Topic: [AMD/Nvidia/CPU] FinMiner (Read 1585 times)
Your miner is being used by some fraudster here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/phoenix-miner-41-boost-3-9-5088818. He pretends that it is Phoenix miner, but there is Finminer inside the archive with a trojan horse according to https://www.virustotal.com.
Thank youThe page have been deleted
In the description of the miner, the commission is not written to the developer.
she is?
on the work of the miner. I really got into it.
Works with 19 pieces of cards in the farm.
based on mat asus b250 maning edichen
http://www.willem-ua.com/Foto2/2018-12-24_02-51-59.png
23.4MH/s - 106-100 ( GTX1060 )
29.6 - 31MH/s - RX470 RX480 RX580
she is?
on the work of the miner. I really got into it.
Works with 19 pieces of cards in the farm.
based on mat asus b250 maning edichen
http://www.willem-ua.com/Foto2/2018-12-24_02-51-59.png
23.4MH/s - 106-100 ( GTX1060 )
29.6 - 31MH/s - RX470 RX480 RX580
Dev fee is 1%
Your miner is being used by some fraudster here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/phoenix-miner-41-boost-3-9-5088818. He pretends that it is Phoenix miner, but there is Finminer inside the archive with a trojan horse according to https://www.virustotal.com.
In the description of the miner, the commission is not written to the developer.
she is?
on the work of the miner. I really got into it.
Works with 19 pieces of cards in the farm.
based on mat asus b250 maning edichen
http://www.willem-ua.com/Foto2/2018-12-24_02-51-59.png
23.4MH/s - 106-100 ( GTX1060 )
29.6 - 31MH/s - RX470 RX480 RX580
she is?
on the work of the miner. I really got into it.
Works with 19 pieces of cards in the farm.
based on mat asus b250 maning edichen
http://www.willem-ua.com/Foto2/2018-12-24_02-51-59.png
23.4MH/s - 106-100 ( GTX1060 )
29.6 - 31MH/s - RX470 RX480 RX580
Ok thanks I forgot I could choose the finminer in custom miners for eth, but I'll say I got better hashrates with finminer than claymore or phoenixminer
You are welcome
If running finminer in hiveos how can I gpu mine one coin and cpu mine pasc because your only allowed to run one instance of a miner in each flight sheet is there a command I can put in additional command section or would I have to run a different miner for gpu mining and finminer for pasc
If you mean this https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bcW4xlRn7BfjtfKv-SsF6iNn88O2A5mk
You need to use Finminer from mainline for PASC and custom miner (also FinMiner, but the version 2.4.0) for other coin.
If running finminer in hiveos how can I gpu mine one coin and cpu mine pasc because your only allowed to run one instance of a miner in each flight sheet is there a command I can put in additional command section or would I have to run a different miner for gpu mining and finminer for pasc
If you mean this https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bcW4xlRn7BfjtfKv-SsF6iNn88O2A5mk
You need to use Finminer from mainline for PASC and custom miner (also FinMiner, but the version 2.4.0) for other coin.
If running finminer in hiveos how can I gpu mine one coin and cpu mine pasc because your only allowed to run one instance of a miner in each flight sheet is there a command I can put in additional command section or would I have to run a different miner for gpu mining and finminer for pasc
Our DISCORD is here
VIDEO:
The hashrate comparison of CPU mining (PASC) here
The hashrate comparison of CPU mining (PASC) here
FinMiner 2.4.4 is available now!
- Fixed crash on some Windows 7 installations.
- Fixed freeze in case mport option is zero.
- Fixed network-related 28 seconds freeze after 'Setting up algorithm: AlgorithmName' message in log.
- Coinotron PascalCoin pool is now supported.
i try it
slower by 3% then was know miners
eth 1050ti only 13.4 mh/s
slower by 3% then was know miners
eth 1050ti only 13.4 mh/s
What algo you are talking about?
On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads) with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.
In rhminer from polyminer, in release notes of 0.9.4:
Fixed wrong hashrate on linux. (a thread-concurrency bug made H/S show-up higher on linux.)
PS: I have 4450k/s on linux with 24 threads (somewhat optimal setting, more threads gives better hahsrate at the beginning but decreases with time), against 3200kh/s on windows.
I am sure,
We did no have the problem with hashrate reported as rhminer had. You can check the hashrate on any pool.
On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads) with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.
In rhminer from polyminer, in release notes of 0.9.4:
Fixed wrong hashrate on linux. (a thread-concurrency bug made H/S show-up higher on linux.)
PS: I have 4450k/s on linux with 24 threads (somewhat optimal setting, more threads gives better hahsrate at the beginning but decreases with time), against 3200kh/s on windows.
Hashrate should be similar
i try it
slower by 3% then was know miners
eth 1050ti only 13.4 mh/s
slower by 3% then was know miners
eth 1050ti only 13.4 mh/s
On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads) with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.
In rhminer from polyminer, in release notes of 0.9.4:
Fixed wrong hashrate on linux. (a thread-concurrency bug made H/S show-up higher on linux.)
PS: I have 4450k/s on linux with 24 threads (somewhat optimal setting, more threads gives better hahsrate at the beginning but decreases with time), against 3200kh/s on windows.
On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads) with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.
On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads) with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.
On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads) with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.
But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.
Jump to: