Topic: An Analysis of HOW America Fell in the Shitter - page 2. (Read 1679 times)
Just a question from USA political history: When did the big parties start actively blocking each other constantly? Have they at some point tried to reach consensus?
There was a time in America when Kennedy and Nixon had a debate, and it was not about who was doing the Conservative thing and who was doing the Liberal thing. It was about who was doing the RIGHT thing.
In the Kennedy Nixon debate they BOTH talked about Hydroelectric infrastructure (renewable energy) that would bring jobs to Americans. Nixon did have a conservative argument in that he said "I spend less money and still bring nice infrastructure" while Kennedy said he wanted America to become more innovative and robust than ever.
They BOTH cared about the welfare of the people. They BOTH knew that America was only as strong as its weakest link. But at some point, Americans decided that if someone was poor, it was THEIR fault.
LBJ made a speech about "The War on Poverty" and nothing has really happened since. Obama even mentioned it on the anniversary of the speech and people were stunned. Not even a single clap from what I could hear.
No one seems to even understand what a war on poverty would look like, so they just brush it under the rug and act as if their is some individual flaw of each failed person that made them that way.
When BOTH parties cared about infrastructure and jobs, America was booming, winning basically. Not creating terrorists and debt around the world. But now we have fallen in to a hole.
Oil has us chasing our tail, and innovation has been stifled. McCain says "Russia is just a gas station masquerading as a country" and I am afraid that our leaders idolize that idea unknowingly.
In the Kennedy Nixon debate they BOTH talked about Hydroelectric infrastructure (renewable energy) that would bring jobs to Americans. Nixon did have a conservative argument in that he said "I spend less money and still bring nice infrastructure" while Kennedy said he wanted America to become more innovative and robust than ever.
They BOTH cared about the welfare of the people. They BOTH knew that America was only as strong as its weakest link. But at some point, Americans decided that if someone was poor, it was THEIR fault.
LBJ made a speech about "The War on Poverty" and nothing has really happened since. Obama even mentioned it on the anniversary of the speech and people were stunned. Not even a single clap from what I could hear.
No one seems to even understand what a war on poverty would look like, so they just brush it under the rug and act as if their is some individual flaw of each failed person that made them that way.
When BOTH parties cared about infrastructure and jobs, America was booming, winning basically. Not creating terrorists and debt around the world. But now we have fallen in to a hole.
Oil has us chasing our tail, and innovation has been stifled. McCain says "Russia is just a gas station masquerading as a country" and I am afraid that our leaders idolize that idea unknowingly.
SAd thing is, we do not ned Middle Eastern, Russian or any import oil at all.
The USA EXPORTS OIL!
It is easier however to simply export brave American service men and women as cannon fodder to protect our "interests" (Read" "OIL INTERESTS") than to break our dependence on foregin oil..
Dueing WWII, which in point of fact ENDED nearly 70 years ago, a substatial portion of the fuel supply of the Germans came from SYNTHETIC OIL.
Now if the Nazis could do it that far back, why can't we now?
WTF is wrong with us?
Thank you for your ingitful and accurate post!
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I came here to snicker at your title 
But went on to read your post as well and yes governments didn't used to be so bi-polar politics made them like that but rational actions based on what is best is how all political systems should be.
It's not a political thing it's what is best for all people in society, saving money or developing new technologies they may disagree but it should be civil.
But went on to read your post as well and yes governments didn't used to be so bi-polar politics made them like that but rational actions based on what is best is how all political systems should be.
It's not a political thing it's what is best for all people in society, saving money or developing new technologies they may disagree but it should be civil.
Cultural issue is hard to solve.
American exceptalism is just a lie.
American exceptalism is just a lie.
It's easy to blame our leaders. However, my take on this is that more Americans care about what kind of dumbass thing the Kardashians are doing today than care about what's happening on Wall Street or even at their own town hall which you would think would have more to do with their daily lives. Whenever somebody whines to me about why the guv'ment doesn't do something about such-and-so, I want to smack them upside the head and tell them to go volunteer at a soup kitchen or buy a Bitcoin and donate it to their favorite charity if they really care enough to spend time complaining about it. Because I hate that the U.S. has pretty much screwed its own space program too, but I could be one of the first to go to Mars simply because I had the nerve to apply for this little thing called Mars One, you know?
There is a lot of ruin in a nation. America's decline has been a steady once since its post World War II peak. I think you'll be hard pressed to pin point a single turning point. Maybe 1972, end of Bretton Woods monetary system, withdrawal from Vietnam, and Watergate? Hard to say but it is fun to think about.
It will be a lot easier to do this once it is clear that the US really is in the shitter. She may not be done just yet.
I am of the opinion that many facts presented to support the assumption that the US is going down, actually support a contrary position, that the largest part of the world is rising up. Thus we may interpret things as "bad" that are obviously "good".It will be a lot easier to do this once it is clear that the US really is in the shitter. She may not be done just yet.
As an example, if we could time warp back to the 1950s 1960s cold war and ask "how would you like it if you didn't have a threat of nuclear war, if both China and Russia were not hell bent on world dominion, had partially free market economies that we routinely traded with..."
...so forth and so on, people back then would uniformly say that would be a wonderful future.
There is a lot of ruin in a nation. America's decline has been a steady once since its post World War II peak. I think you'll be hard pressed to pin point a single turning point. Maybe 1972, end of Bretton Woods monetary system, withdrawal from Vietnam, and Watergate? Hard to say but it is fun to think about.
It will be a lot easier to do this once it is clear that the US really is in the shitter. She may not be done just yet.
It will be a lot easier to do this once it is clear that the US really is in the shitter. She may not be done just yet.
The biggest concern I see is the continued devaluation of the US currency - whether it be through bailouts (giving money to companies doing risky practices), or running up national debt: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That issue has to be addressed ASAP.
After that, I see oil and energy sources being the second highest priority.
After that, I see oil and energy sources being the second highest priority.
Bolded above, just a note. It doesn't HAVE to be addressed ASAP. Quite the contrary. And realize that any calls to "address it ASAP" that you hear coming from the District of Criminals will be oriented toward taking more of your an my money. Either from our retirement plans, or shaving it off our bank accounts, capital or juggling the currency.
After all, solutions that don't allow for embedded corruption can't be allowed.
To echo the sentiments of the latest posters, yeah, the massive special interest spending leads to debt monetization because the interests couldn't all get what they want if the tab had to be paid up front. Obviously, this leads to currency manipulation and devaluation which takes a while to catch up to the people if the inflation is exported overseas since lots of countries use the USD as the reserve currency especially for purchasing oil.
The biggest concern I see is the continued devaluation of the US currency - whether it be through bailouts (giving money to companies doing risky practices), or running up national debt: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ That issue has to be addressed ASAP.
After that, I see oil and energy sources being the second highest priority.
After that, I see oil and energy sources being the second highest priority.
There was a time in America when Kennedy and Nixon had a debate, and it was not about who was doing the Conservative thing and who was doing the Liberal thing. It was about who was doing the RIGHT thing.
In the Kennedy Nixon debate they BOTH talked about Hydroelectric infrastructure (renewable energy) that would bring jobs to Americans. Nixon did have a conservative argument in that he said "I spend less money and still bring nice infrastructure" while Kennedy said he wanted America to become more innovative and robust than ever.
They BOTH cared about the welfare of the people. They BOTH knew that America was only as strong as its weakest link. But at some point, Americans decided that if someone was poor, it was THEIR fault.
LBJ made a speech about "The War on Poverty" and nothing has really happened since. Obama even mentioned it on the anniversary of the speech and people were stunned. Not even a single clap from what I could hear.
No one seems to even understand what a war on poverty would look like, so they just brush it under the rug and act as if their is some individual flaw of each failed person that made them that way.
When BOTH parties cared about infrastructure and jobs, America was booming, winning basically. Not creating terrorists and debt around the world. But now we have fallen in to a hole.
Oil has us chasing our tail, and innovation has been stifled. McCain says "Russia is just a gas station masquerading as a country" and I am afraid that our leaders idolize that idea unknowingly.
In the Kennedy Nixon debate they BOTH talked about Hydroelectric infrastructure (renewable energy) that would bring jobs to Americans. Nixon did have a conservative argument in that he said "I spend less money and still bring nice infrastructure" while Kennedy said he wanted America to become more innovative and robust than ever.
They BOTH cared about the welfare of the people. They BOTH knew that America was only as strong as its weakest link. But at some point, Americans decided that if someone was poor, it was THEIR fault.
LBJ made a speech about "The War on Poverty" and nothing has really happened since. Obama even mentioned it on the anniversary of the speech and people were stunned. Not even a single clap from what I could hear.
No one seems to even understand what a war on poverty would look like, so they just brush it under the rug and act as if their is some individual flaw of each failed person that made them that way.
When BOTH parties cared about infrastructure and jobs, America was booming, winning basically. Not creating terrorists and debt around the world. But now we have fallen in to a hole.
Oil has us chasing our tail, and innovation has been stifled. McCain says "Russia is just a gas station masquerading as a country" and I am afraid that our leaders idolize that idea unknowingly.
Sound deflationary currency would be a great first shot in a "war on poverty." Politicians talk about it when it is convenient to do so. They then use handouts to create a dependent class and turn their opponents into straw men to scare the dependent class into a voting block.
Well, McCain is beyond past his prime and likely fucked in the head as he's always cheerleading for using America's military abroad. He's the same guy that was all for arming Syrian rebels who in turn either gave them to the terrorists of ISIS or were taken from them, either way terrible idea. The point is all about creating destabilization and then being able to offer the solution of using Amerca's power to get involved and make something right. It's the tried and true method of neocons but their way of thinking is tiring on the right and most republicans agree w/ Rand Paul's position on the current foreign policy (see my Rand Paul thread for details).
But more to the point, there's a political ruling class also known as the establishment and their bought and paid for mission is to spend money on special interest garbage which typically results in less residual liberty for the people. However, there is a renaissance republican movement also known as the liberty republicans like Paul, Amash, Massie to name a few plus more being elected every election. As the old guard fades away over time and the new blood takes over, the real republican party of the Sen. Taft years will emerge again and show the way forward to better times. This will take plenty of doing as the entrenched interests aren't going to just turn coat and run. Either way, Bitcoin will either help us bypass the system or help repair it.
But more to the point, there's a political ruling class also known as the establishment and their bought and paid for mission is to spend money on special interest garbage which typically results in less residual liberty for the people. However, there is a renaissance republican movement also known as the liberty republicans like Paul, Amash, Massie to name a few plus more being elected every election. As the old guard fades away over time and the new blood takes over, the real republican party of the Sen. Taft years will emerge again and show the way forward to better times. This will take plenty of doing as the entrenched interests aren't going to just turn coat and run. Either way, Bitcoin will either help us bypass the system or help repair it.
There was a time in America when Kennedy and Nixon had a debate, and it was not about who was doing the Conservative thing and who was doing the Liberal thing. It was about who was doing the RIGHT thing.
In the Kennedy Nixon debate they BOTH talked about Hydroelectric infrastructure (renewable energy) that would bring jobs to Americans. Nixon did have a conservative argument in that he said "I spend less money and still bring nice infrastructure" while Kennedy said he wanted America to become more innovative and robust than ever.
They BOTH cared about the welfare of the people. They BOTH knew that America was only as strong as its weakest link. But at some point, Americans decided that if someone was poor, it was THEIR fault.
LBJ made a speech about "The War on Poverty" and nothing has really happened since. Obama even mentioned it on the anniversary of the speech and people were stunned. Not even a single clap from what I could hear.
No one seems to even understand what a war on poverty would look like, so they just brush it under the rug and act as if their is some individual flaw of each failed person that made them that way.
When BOTH parties cared about infrastructure and jobs, America was booming, winning basically. Not creating terrorists and debt around the world. But now we have fallen in to a hole.
Oil has us chasing our tail, and innovation has been stifled. McCain says "Russia is just a gas station masquerading as a country" and I am afraid that our leaders idolize that idea unknowingly.
In the Kennedy Nixon debate they BOTH talked about Hydroelectric infrastructure (renewable energy) that would bring jobs to Americans. Nixon did have a conservative argument in that he said "I spend less money and still bring nice infrastructure" while Kennedy said he wanted America to become more innovative and robust than ever.
They BOTH cared about the welfare of the people. They BOTH knew that America was only as strong as its weakest link. But at some point, Americans decided that if someone was poor, it was THEIR fault.
LBJ made a speech about "The War on Poverty" and nothing has really happened since. Obama even mentioned it on the anniversary of the speech and people were stunned. Not even a single clap from what I could hear.
No one seems to even understand what a war on poverty would look like, so they just brush it under the rug and act as if their is some individual flaw of each failed person that made them that way.
When BOTH parties cared about infrastructure and jobs, America was booming, winning basically. Not creating terrorists and debt around the world. But now we have fallen in to a hole.
Oil has us chasing our tail, and innovation has been stifled. McCain says "Russia is just a gas station masquerading as a country" and I am afraid that our leaders idolize that idea unknowingly.
Jump to: