Topic: An old but unexplored project (Read 516 times)

Wherein those older projects are the most reliable ones, how many of these old projects have you heard or seen with issues of scam? None of them, they came into being when people still have a very good mind towards ICO, unlike this new ones now that are promising to develop based on the faults they have seen in the older projects.

If they so much have the interest of the crypto space at heart, they would have just merge with these older projects since they all have an idea, and  knowing fully well that too many coins we have in the market is also contributing to why our crypto space is filled with all these shitcoins.

Old project won't be rising in the surface if they are not actively developing their products,
actively in touch with community, and running some marketing strategies to create awareness about their project.
But sometimes old project can come unexpected if they have major news, about products, or listed on big exchanges, etc.

To be honest, I think that old projects have not a big chance to show good growth. Nowadays new coins are interesting for the market. Therefore, I think it is better to invest in new projects.

It is very interesting to see DCT still alive after a surprise last year, it for sure not all of investors keep this project now and maybe they just ignore this one.

This is good to know that older projects have been stabilized and really have that potential to fight against odds. It have a good team which they are working hard to make it more valuable than of the others that is why they have that guts to compete others in the market.

Old project and still working can be a good one, they just need to improve their team and work harder with their project. If there’s a project already, that can be an advantage to them. Its good to start a marketing works again if an old project are still unknown. Interested projects will always have way to grow, but if they remain on this position then its risky for them.

It doesn't have to be a good old project, so if we don't understand it, it's better to understand it before joining.
find out in detail so you are more sure to choose it, if the project is good and the team can develop well so that the community will be interested in the project.

If there is still no active talk about this project, it means that it is not so interesting for society. Well, or the marketing Department of their team works very poorly. But I think the first option is more likely.

Yes, these old project If they are really good can still be promoting their projects since they still have supply left to be sold, so they should be more active in making it work better rather than just waiting for bull run, some of them actually picked up in the last bull run if you check their data history, so instead on relying on their product to work and earn them a good value, they keep relying on Bitcoin bull run to do the work for them, but like you said, they might actually be working on another project too which might have even been released without us knowing.

Older projects don't want to lose the competition and their teams almost do all necessary requirements for preventing any potential losses. It is hard to revive the old unhealthy projects but it doesn't mean they lost the chance completely.

Hello, everyone,

I just stumbled upon this thread and would like to address those comments about non-distributed bounties. I didn't find any specific case here, but if you have any, please share it or even better, send the details to [email protected] and we will have a look at it.

If we are talking about our most recent DECENT OPEN BOUNTY Program (https://explorer.bounties.network/profile/0xf956f4d787f8ca0f363468859e54ead5ca1e5184), it's been 17 days since the deadline. We will be distributing the bounties any day now, just waiting for some internal confirmations.

The reason for using ETH was purely out of the convenience of it - this platform we were using in our bounty program doesn't allow us technically to use DCT. Sure it makes more sense to use DCT and we will consider that in the future.

Every bounty in the past was paid out fully, even though there were some cases of people who didn't read the rules and didn't follow all the steps, like for example not sending us their wallet address until a specific date ("IMPORTANT: Bounty participants must submit their claims and sent DECENT wallet addresses before March 31st, 2018! Submissions after this date will not be processed and the ability to claim those bounties will be lost." >> https://decent.ch/blog/decent-bounty-hunters-read-this/).

There was also a lot of people who didn't finish their ICO Reclaim process, but this will soon be distributed as well. Anyone who is not sure about the status of their reclaim process are asked to contact our support on [email protected] and we will be happy to verify it.

Nowadays, most old projects are just giving up for the news projects and I don’t know why they feel threatened by the news ones, when they should be the ones ruling the market more based on their genuine mind when they first created it, most of these ICO created in 2015 still had good intention with quality products, unlike this new projects that we are now having with little passion for the project but much love for investor’s money.

Older projects needs to be up and running, there are so many marketing strategies they can still use to revive them again, people are really looking up to them for the great product they have for the crypto users.

The were on one of the top exchange until Bittrex goes down the rank.  Bittrex is still a good exchange.  I belileve it  would be best to spend the money to develop the project than waste a lot of it in exchange listing.  Project is not all about being listed in all the exchanges.  It is about delivering what is laid on the roadmap.  That is what I believe.

Never heard about it, but seems like it is another smart-contract platform. There are already many smart-contract platforms and I think this project will find much difficulties competing with other platforms like Waves, Ethereum, even EOS. However their token are already listed on Bittrex which is a small good thing, however their marketcap is not that big, so I don't think this project worth my money, there are tons of better coins out there.

for an old project that had collected funds since the time before the bullrun, the team must have profited a lot. i don't think they are that bankrupt. and if today they are still not listed on big exchange or begin added to another for a long time, i must say they aren't that dedicated. the expected date for the project to be developed is long over due.

Probably it was just being dumped. I am speculating that team managing the project were now in working in different project for if not then they should considet promoting it and began marketing it to more users in crypto market by listing it in different exchanges. Binance.is one good exchange to be consider if the project has the money to spend for it for listing fee in BINANCE exchange.

Looking at some comments I believe, they should still be a good project since they still exist and their volume ln exchanges are pretty much a decent one since there are only a few of the community members who are still holding their coins even if its outperformed.

decent? I didn't even hear about this project after last year's fall, I thought this project was dead.

yes maybe this project has been a long time ago, but to say old I think it's still too fast. So far I see Decent has no hope of going up. low trading volume, support a small community, and are less popular. 3 things that make me sure about this.

Despite being in existence since 2015, there is still no much activity within the platform , thus one can't be mistaken for saying the Devs lacks what it takes to keep the project running or turn it into a valuable one.

After reading a few posts from this thread, I could deduce that DCT have some issues with distribution of bounty. If a project can't handle properly their bounty program, my conclusion is that their marketing is poor. Poor marketing might be what they need to address to get themselves known to the world if they are serious about what they are offering.

Definitely. Just being old is better in terms of reliability than newly created. In fact, if the project was good, it should have made great progress from 2015 until now. If it has not changed much, then there was a reason.