<...>
Thanks for the suggestions. I do have some doubt's in terms of the interpretation of each individual figure (which are now clearer to me), and I also saw that there are concentration of values on the multiples of 10 values of the score. I’ll modify the OP as per your suggestions to facilitate interpreting the information.
Topic: Analysis - DT Depth 2 - Profile Distribution (Read 286 times)
Great data as usual. Just a small nitpick: [1..10], and then (10..20] would probably make more sense than [1..10) and [10..20) because of how scores "age".
E.g. if you get +1 from DT the score will gradually (over a months?) go up to 10 and stay there.
So [1..10] would reflect all those with aging or fully aged +1 ratings, (10..20] would be +2 etc if there are no negatives.
Edit: I'm talking about #2.
For #3 and #4 you might want to use a different word instead of "score" - it's not the same score as in #2, but rather a number of positive/negative ratings, right?
E.g. if you get +1 from DT the score will gradually (over a months?) go up to 10 and stay there.
So [1..10] would reflect all those with aging or fully aged +1 ratings, (10..20] would be +2 etc if there are no negatives.
Edit: I'm talking about #2.
For #3 and #4 you might want to use a different word instead of "score" - it's not the same score as in #2, but rather a number of positive/negative ratings, right?
1. Introduction.
@Piggy has kindly made available some interesting raw data, that allows us to get some insights into some global Bitcointalk profile related information. Specifically, I looked at the Trust profile information.
The information provided in this analysis is related to the Default Trust layout, without customization of any sort, and set at depth 2 (if that is not your setting, the numbers presented here will vary from you profile vision, and the detailed profile trust information provided in a list further ahead on this post). The base considered is that of 2.437.064 forum profiles (profiles as of a week ago roughly).
Trust has 3 components (A: B /C), whose exact current calculus I have not been able to find (the core thread on the topic is Marketplace trust), where:
A is the Trust Score.
B is the number of unique users who have given the dealt with person negative feedback.
C is the number of unique users who have given the dealt with person positive feedback.
Edit: @suchmoon posted on another thread a link to a post by @theymos, where he explains the current Trust algorithm in detail (see: Minor trust score algorithm change). After reading through, I've changed the description above for B and C.
I’ve included a complete list of all <> 0 Trust profiles, along with some profile information here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17iRvcL149--2erpOmU0VufebRINo4BFvvoYHPVb-bBY/edit?usp=sharing
2. Trust Score (A) - Distribution
Trust Score (A) has the following distribution across the complete Bitcointalk profile base:
Things that stand out:
a) 1.940 profiles have positive trust (0,08% of all profiles), 14.969 have negative trust or unknown (0,614%), and the remaining 2.420.155 profiles have this value set to cero (99,306%).
b) Positive trust is concentrated on Legendries (423), Hero Members (323), Sr. Members (293), Full Members (254), Members (215) … and strangely enough Newbies (303).
c) There are even 15 cases of Brand New with positive trust, although only three have been active during 2018: MindlessElectron (a self-declared bot account), nemya and avanpay.
d) Negative or unknown Trust is concentrated on newbies (7.691), Brand New (1.937), Members (1.530), Full Members (1.515), Sr.Members (1.083), Heroes (573) and Legendries (248).
e) There are 45 entries will a Null value, corresponding to profiles with the value ?? (unknown - examples: winter and BlockEye).
Top 25:
Bottom 25:
Since there are many accounts that do not even login, I’ve also narrowed down the data to accounts that have logged in during 2018, with a non-cero trust value:
a) 1.343 profiles that have logged-in during 2018 have positive trust, while 7.882 have negative trust or unknown.
b) Positive trust is concentrated on Legendries (390), Hero Members (225), Sr. Members (189), Full Members (159), Members (121) … and Newbies (123).
c) Negative or unknown Trust is concentrated on newbies (3.486), Brand New (675), Members (964), Full Members (1.045), Sr.Members (749), Heroes (393) and Legendries (201).
d) 54,56% of non-cero Trust profiles have logged-in during 2018.
I crossed the average earned merit per segment x rank, to see if there were significant differences:
Nevertheless, I wouldn’t really pay too much notice to the above table, since we do not know the order of events on the Negative Trust segments (i.e., many likely got their awarded merit before the negative trust, not after the negative trust).
The following I think have less weight in the big picture, so I’ll just lay out the distributions without further additional comment:
3. Negative Ratings (B) - Distribution
Global distribution:
Logged-in during 2018 distribution:
4. Positive Ratings (C) - Distribution
Global distribution:
Logged-in during 2018 distribution:
@Piggy has kindly made available some interesting raw data, that allows us to get some insights into some global Bitcointalk profile related information. Specifically, I looked at the Trust profile information.
The information provided in this analysis is related to the Default Trust layout, without customization of any sort, and set at depth 2 (if that is not your setting, the numbers presented here will vary from you profile vision, and the detailed profile trust information provided in a list further ahead on this post). The base considered is that of 2.437.064 forum profiles (profiles as of a week ago roughly).
Trust has 3 components (A: B /C)
A is the Trust Score.
B is the number of unique users who have given the dealt with person negative feedback.
C is the number of unique users who have given the dealt with person positive feedback.
Edit: @suchmoon posted on another thread a link to a post by @theymos, where he explains the current Trust algorithm in detail (see: Minor trust score algorithm change). After reading through, I've changed the description above for B and C.
I’ve included a complete list of all <> 0 Trust profiles, along with some profile information here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17iRvcL149--2erpOmU0VufebRINo4BFvvoYHPVb-bBY/edit?usp=sharing
2. Trust Score (A) - Distribution
Trust Score (A) has the following distribution across the complete Bitcointalk profile base:
Things that stand out:
a) 1.940 profiles have positive trust (0,08% of all profiles), 14.969 have negative trust or unknown (0,614%), and the remaining 2.420.155 profiles have this value set to cero (99,306%).
b) Positive trust is concentrated on Legendries (423), Hero Members (323), Sr. Members (293), Full Members (254), Members (215) … and strangely enough Newbies (303).
c) There are even 15 cases of Brand New with positive trust, although only three have been active during 2018: MindlessElectron (a self-declared bot account), nemya and avanpay.
d) Negative or unknown Trust is concentrated on newbies (7.691), Brand New (1.937), Members (1.530), Full Members (1.515), Sr.Members (1.083), Heroes (573) and Legendries (248).
e) There are 45 entries will a Null value, corresponding to profiles with the value ?? (unknown - examples: winter and BlockEye).
Top 25:
Code:
trust rank userId UserName LastActive URL
356: -0 / +36 Donator 18321 OgNasty 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18321
333: -0 / +34 Legendary 134378 Blazed 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=134378
270: -0 / +27 Legendary 133846 monbux 2018-08-27 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133846
240: -0 / +24 Legendary 37522 Tomatocage 2018-05-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37522
210: -0 / +21 Legendary 81292 Stunna 2018-11-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81292
180: -0 / +18 Legendary 136592 devthedev 2018-10-20 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=136592
178: -0 / +18 Legendary 113670 Mitchell 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=113670
178: -0 / +18 Legendary 31288 John (John K.) 2018-11-01 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31288
175: -0 / +18 Copper Member 346731 minerjones 2018-11-04 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=346731
170: -0 / +17 Administrator 35 theymos 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=35
170: -0 / +17 Legendary 15728 TECSHARE 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15728
170: -0 / +17 Donator 18614 CanaryInTheMine 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18614
167: -0 / +17 Legendary 162384 hedgy73 2018-11-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162384
150: -0 / +15 Legendary 38894 SaltySpitoon 2018-11-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=38894
142: -0 / +15 Legendary 3420 dooglus 2018-11-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420
141: -0 / +15 Legendary 30747 Vod 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747
140: -0 / +14 Legendary 122354 Carra23 2016-07-27 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=122354
140: -0 / +14 Legendary 79720 cooldgamer 2018-09-04 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=79720
140: -0 / +14 Legendary 224612 bithalo 2018-11-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=224612
139: -0 / +14 Legendary 109430 TookDk 2018-09-22 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109430
138: -0 / +14 Legendary 18640 SebastianJu 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18640
137: -0 / +14 Legendary 169515 EcuaMobi 2018-11-01 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=169515
129: -0 / +13 Legendary 153656 TheNewAnon135246 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153656
129: -0 / +13 Legendary 64507 philipma1957 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64507
120: -0 / +12 Legendary 353680 chronicsky 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=353680
Bottom 25:
Code:
trust rank userId UserName LastActive URL
-9999: -14 / +4 VIP 67058 TradeFortress 2018-10-31 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058
-9999: -16 / +10 Hero Member 89329 master-P 2016-01-19 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=89329
-2048: -11 / +0 Newbie 650557 magic max 2015-11-24 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=650557
-2048: -11 / +0 Jr. Member 1764044 alia 2018-03-06 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1764044
-512: -9 / +0 Legendary 8198 Inaba 2014-12-31 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=8198
-512: -9 / +0 Hero Member 177007 Pierre11 2018-02-07 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=177007
-505: -9 / +7 Legendary 35312 Maidak 2017-08-11 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=35312
-256: -8 / +0 Legendary 197593 amaclin 2018-09-29 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=197593
-256: -8 / +0 Full Member 525055 GotaPauj 2015-11-27 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525055
-256: -8 / +0 Jr. Member 1738568 eNazifKoin 2018-05-19 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1738568
-240: -8 / +16 Sr. Member 343899 BiPolarBob 2018-06-07 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=343899
-128: -7 / +0 Legendary 202115 Betcoin.AG 2018-11-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=202115
-128: -7 / +0 Newbie 154345 haightst 2018-03-12 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154345
-128: -7 / +0 Hero Member 309031 Kozan 2016-06-02 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=309031
-128: -7 / +0 Member 311138 Archerbow550 2017-08-06 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=311138
-128: -7 / +0 Full Member 561660 Ralobot.com 2016-03-16 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=561660
-128: -7 / +0 Member 562146 Magnesium Coin 2016-08-09 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=562146
-128: -7 / +0 Hero Member 874254 game-protect 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254
-128: -7 / +0 Sr. Member 485410 SNavy 2016-10-10 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=485410
-128: -7 / +0 Full Member 44366 BFL 2017-07-11 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=44366
-128: -7 / +0 Full Member 397854 Ninjahitoko 2016-07-14 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=397854
-128: -7 / +0 Brand new 517700 fuck_her_rightinthepussy 2016-08-17 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=517700
-114: -7 / +14 Copper Member 358020 Quickseller 2018-11-03 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020
-64: -6 / +0 Member 152722 TheGambler 2018-03-22 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152722
-64: -6 / +0 Hero Member 403194 BTCBLOGGER 2017-11-11 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=403194
Since there are many accounts that do not even login, I’ve also narrowed down the data to accounts that have logged in during 2018, with a non-cero trust value:
a) 1.343 profiles that have logged-in during 2018 have positive trust, while 7.882 have negative trust or unknown.
b) Positive trust is concentrated on Legendries (390), Hero Members (225), Sr. Members (189), Full Members (159), Members (121) … and Newbies (123).
c) Negative or unknown Trust is concentrated on newbies (3.486), Brand New (675), Members (964), Full Members (1.045), Sr.Members (749), Heroes (393) and Legendries (201).
d) 54,56% of non-cero Trust profiles have logged-in during 2018.
I crossed the average earned merit per segment x rank, to see if there were significant differences:
Nevertheless, I wouldn’t really pay too much notice to the above table, since we do not know the order of events on the Negative Trust segments (i.e., many likely got their awarded merit before the negative trust, not after the negative trust).
The following I think have less weight in the big picture, so I’ll just lay out the distributions without further additional comment:
3. Negative Ratings (B) - Distribution
Global distribution:
Logged-in during 2018 distribution:
4. Positive Ratings (C) - Distribution
Global distribution:
Logged-in during 2018 distribution:
Jump to: