Topic: Marketplace trust (Read 83249 times)

Kingperry22, as I see, has not appeared on the forum since March, and just after returning he was immediately interested not in participating in the bitcoin related topics on the forum, but in deleting of the neutral tag. I don't see the point in deleting this tag right now. Perhaps over time, when it becomes obvious that Kingperry22 is really interested in communicating and does not resort to bad practices of using texts not written by him, I can delete this tag, but I don’t see the point at the moment.

I largely agree with this BlackBoss_'s response, and it seems that the neutral trust feedback should not be any kind of a hinderance to your ability to meaningfully participate in the forum, and it does not even seem unfair since jokers10 provided a reference (proof of why he gave the neutral feedback).  

I would imagine that if a person continues to post with the use of AI then more members will become suspicious of the account and maybe even find reasons to give negative (red) trust rather than neutral. at the same time, it is true that jokers10 had given you the neutral feedback around 6 months ago, so it could be possible that you have not been repeating your earlier bad posting history and it could be possible based on new circumstances that jokers10 might be willing to review and/or reconsider his having had given the earlier neutral feedback to your account.  

I have received red trust and neutral trust (feedback) over the years and even had members put me on their distrust list, and the sometimes the member disappears or gets banned from the forum after they already gave me negative trust and/or had put me on their distrust list, so it is likely that the negative trust will never be removed from showing up on my account.  

So like BlackBoss_ mentioned, it seems that one of the ways to offset any negative trust that you receive is by spending time building a reputation as being someone who contributes to the forum in a variety of ways that might include sharing your own ideas and experiences, and/or responding to other forum members.  Your actions through time would be more likely to inspire a forum member to remove some neutral or negative feedback that he had given, that is if the forum member remains a member who is able to remove such negative/neutral trust, and it seems to be completely in the discretion of the forum member (in this case jokers10) to decide to remove such feedback - but seems unlikely that he would be inspired to removed such feedback based on your merely asserting that you learned your lesson (rather than you spending some time building a post history of relatively decent quality posts).. .. but you never know if jokers10 might be a bit of a softie... I wouldn't claim to know.

Another possibility, besides jokers10 removing the feedback, would be that if some other member(s) were to provide you with positive trust or even put you on their trust list, and frequently it will take a while to build those kinds of levels of trust - even though surely there are some members who build trust by engaging in commerce with other members, and I don't claim to be any kind of expert with those kinds of forum interactions.. even though over the years, more and more opportunities might develop to have some kind of an interaction or trade or payment for service kind of a situation that ends up taking place... and sometimes even with that, some of us, including yours truly, may need to spend some time updating our trust feedback and/or our trust/distrust lists.

It can be done by the person who left the neutral feedback on your account. It is a feedback on your abuse of AI for generating your posts. Honestly, I see you don't have anything to lose with this account by creating it and generating posts with AI support.

There are second chances but you have to go a long way to prove that you actually change a lot with your posting style and considerable helpful contributions for forum community. If you can not make these things, the neutral feedback won't be removed, no second chances will be given to you.

If you don't want to see the feedback, add that member to your Distrust list
~jokers10

Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

Only the person who flagged you can remove or change that feedback. It will also not be visible if the member who gave you the feedback is removed from DT. Maybe you can ask them nicely through a PM or mention their username here to request a review of the feedback posted on your account. (mention the username just incase the user is using bitcointalk telegram supernotifier).

Can my trust be reverted back to 0. I was a newbie when my account was flagged or reported by someone. I have understood this interface and learnt on how to be proficient using this forum.  Can it be done?

You mean the real world where everything is not black and white? Furthermore it is possible for one individual to be abusive and another to not be abusive in addition to them taking a correct action in addition to an abusive action. I am sorry your little smear didn't work out as you planned. Have a good one!



Quoting for reference.



Hmmmm. I wonder what this question could POSSIBLY be referencing! Trying your hand at a little memory holing Vod?

No, I didn’t. Post evidence or admit you’re a lying piece of shit.

Spoiler alert: Vod can’t post evidence because he made it up. He’s a liar with severe mental stability issues.

I don't need to prove you a liar again, do I?

The staff do something you don't like = they are the bad guys and the statement in your signature applies.

The staff do something you like = they make "credible choices" and we should ignore the above till this is fully utilized for your own benefit.

BRO , i want to live in your world , it is so CONVENIENT.

You are conveniently ignoring the part of my post in which you have the opportunity to prove I am a liar. Or that you are a 🤥

I am not misrepresenting you - your ethics are "do what makes coin", right?

You haven't called the police because they would want to know who you are on such a serious accusation.    It wouldn't make you any coin either.

You are a liar, and you should be thankful I still waste time entertaining you. 

You are misrepresenting my previous statements and you don’t know who I have or haven’t contacted.

You are also ignoring my previous challenge. Or would you prefer to save face and admit the PM is authentic?

It would also be foolish.  

You believe I rape children and you haven't even called the police.   Tell us more of your "ethics"....

I am not sure what that is supposed to mean. There is no double speak in that post. You can ask theymos to confirm/deny the authenticity of the PM I posted above. His silence would work in your favor. His confirmation the PM is authentic would be a major hit to your credibility and reputation.

I have explained previously that I believe it to be unethical to sue you. I would be careful because I don’t think everyone else feels that way.

I've love to see you in court, with all your double speak and what if's. 

Want to go on Judge Judy with me? 

If you are so confident that the PM is fake, you should ask theymos to publicly confirm the authenticity of the PM. Even if he is silent, it would be in your favor, but a confirmation the PM is legitimate and was sent to you would tarnish your reputation and credibility.

Those are words from you, sorry.   

Those are words from BadBear. You can call him a scammer if you want.

You were previously excluded by HostFat, who is a staff member.

I've never been abusive and I've never been excluded.  

Here ya go!
The above PM was sent to Vod