Look man, putting alts against each other or create threads to pump your own is one thing. Quite another is making claims Satoshi didn't predict Asics, so this particular coin you're pumping is better and more useful and bla bla
It may even be an interesting coin, but people tend to forget that the point of mining is not profit, profit is a side-effect. PoW mining is done to solve double spend, secure the network, process transactions while also preventing forks and 51% attacks. If BTC mining with Asics solves the problem, then mining is okay.
Sure, I may flock to a coin to make more satoshis/€'s out of it and will love if I can pull more out of my GPUs. However if one makes money out of a coin, that is a side discussion. Further, the "fair distribution" is commendable, but it is also a side issue. These are cryptographic currencies. This is not forex trading, these are not derivatives, this is not capitalism vs socialism, this is not money printing.
It turns out BTC has more issues with avoiding 51% attack and selfish mining than Myriadcoin,
that's what makes Myriadcoin potentially more secure and superior to Bitcoin. If you can't accept this fact because you're emotionally attached to your BTC, then you don't have an open mind, that's all, and that makes you an amateur investor, bound to lose in the long run.
I'm not attached to BTC, I use whatever "money" I have to buy "stuff" and also as a store of value outside of the "system" (that being IMF and bank account plundering for example). If Bitcoin fails, and I have to move to silver, so be it. I'm waiting to see other crypto-currency provide evidence it allows me more power, flexibility and safety. Until then, all other "superior" coins are just speculative instruments.
Satoshi couldnt predict asics, how could he?
"PoW mining is done to solve double spend, secure the network, process transactions while also preventing forks and 51% attacks. If BTC mining with Asics solves the problem, then mining is okay."
I do LOVE bitcoin, but mining with asics doesnt solves the potential 51% problem, mining with 5 different algos (of which noone could have more than 20%) is more likely to solve it, dont u agree?
"I'm waiting to see other crypto-currency provide evidence it allows me more power, flexibility and safety"
Speaking of flexibility and safety, dont you see a HUGE improvement in a coin that allow you to mine it with whatever hardware is the most profitable time by time, and that even if ALL the asics of the world will be pointed to it, they could never ever mine more than 20%?? what do u need more for safety evidence?