I also asked Moby how much it would cost to have a coin added and how much time it would buy.
they've had SQL on polo for months and months without the coin moving an inch.
MMXIV and BALLS both get some reg volume on there and like you've said about 10k being on the front page of trex for nearly the entire life of the coin so far.
seems like bad business not to add 10k
Topic: [ANN] 10k Coin | Now with 10% PoS and 10000% Superblocks | 10k/MMXIV Market OPEN - page 69. (Read 186734 times)
March 15, 2015, 03:18:14 PM
March 15, 2015, 03:10:49 PM
I just finally sent my email to Mobydick
the main part
"iGotSpots said that you referred to it as being the same as BALLS which couldn't be further from the truth. 10kcoin has 30 sec blocks and a network weight of 4 billion. has been 10,000% pos since mid way through the pow phase which ended with around 60k coins the rest have all been created through the massive 10k% distribution phase which ends at block 360k... where it's inflation will be halted by approx 90% by altering the pos rate to 10% while still giving it's users an awesome incentive to hold by incorporating a 10% chance at finding a "superblock" which will be 10k% pos return.
Yes after the fork BALLS will share the 10% standard pos return but users will only have a 1% chance of finding the massive 100k% superblocks, so they're really both quite unique... there will also be a massive difference in their money supplies as well so if anything they complement each other. iGotSpots has proven to be a determined developer and quickly address's concerns when they come up with any of his 3 coins. users should definitely be able to pick up all 3 of his coins at the same exchange. adding 10k well before it changes at block 360k would allow your users the chance to cash in on it's distribution phase."
the main part
"iGotSpots said that you referred to it as being the same as BALLS which couldn't be further from the truth. 10kcoin has 30 sec blocks and a network weight of 4 billion. has been 10,000% pos since mid way through the pow phase which ended with around 60k coins the rest have all been created through the massive 10k% distribution phase which ends at block 360k... where it's inflation will be halted by approx 90% by altering the pos rate to 10% while still giving it's users an awesome incentive to hold by incorporating a 10% chance at finding a "superblock" which will be 10k% pos return.
Yes after the fork BALLS will share the 10% standard pos return but users will only have a 1% chance of finding the massive 100k% superblocks, so they're really both quite unique... there will also be a massive difference in their money supplies as well so if anything they complement each other. iGotSpots has proven to be a determined developer and quickly address's concerns when they come up with any of his 3 coins. users should definitely be able to pick up all 3 of his coins at the same exchange. adding 10k well before it changes at block 360k would allow your users the chance to cash in on it's distribution phase."
Thanks
Just to clarify, though, BALLS will not have the flat 10% - BALLS stake rate will be the last two numbers of the timestamp, unless they are 00, which will create a 100,000% superblock. It does not have flat rates at all like 10k does
lol sh!t thats right 1-99 % and I forgot it's block time
March 15, 2015, 03:09:33 PM
Thing is I don't really trade on Bittrex but I do hold M.. oh well
March 15, 2015, 02:50:16 PM
Just so you guys know, I have requested that Poloniex delist both BALLS and MMXIV. The reasoning is simple: these three coins are a package deal. Not having all 3 on the same exchanges fucks up a lot on our backend. Without getting into detail, the problems caused by having 2/3 coins listed in one place far outweigh the benefits for those two coins
I still like Poloniex, but they think BALLS and 10k are the same coin. I have respect for them, but this situation is fucking things up for us and it's not worth the time to change things because one exchange doesn't understand the difference between two coins
I respectfully ask everyone to request the same from mobydick and busoni. In this current situation, things are being inconvenienced for no reason. I've consulted with those in a decision making role for services or coin maintenance on these coins and we agree that this is the best way to move all three coins forward
These three very unique (and very different from each other) coins are a package deal. If one does not get listed, none should
I still like Poloniex, but they think BALLS and 10k are the same coin. I have respect for them, but this situation is fucking things up for us and it's not worth the time to change things because one exchange doesn't understand the difference between two coins
I respectfully ask everyone to request the same from mobydick and busoni. In this current situation, things are being inconvenienced for no reason. I've consulted with those in a decision making role for services or coin maintenance on these coins and we agree that this is the best way to move all three coins forward
These three very unique (and very different from each other) coins are a package deal. If one does not get listed, none should
What exactly does it fuck up on your back end?
Multipools and stat tickers that we are working on (and already in IRC) for starters. It's about keeping these three coins together. This is a community that is built upon 4 separate chains now that ECASH is in our extended family
If someone invited you to a party, but told your sister she couldn't come, would you still go? I wouldn't
March 15, 2015, 02:03:46 PM
Just so you guys know, I have requested that Poloniex delist both BALLS and MMXIV. The reasoning is simple: these three coins are a package deal. Not having all 3 on the same exchanges fucks up a lot on our backend. Without getting into detail, the problems caused by having 2/3 coins listed in one place far outweigh the benefits for those two coins
I still like Poloniex, but they think BALLS and 10k are the same coin. I have respect for them, but this situation is fucking things up for us and it's not worth the time to change things because one exchange doesn't understand the difference between two coins
I respectfully ask everyone to request the same from mobydick and busoni. In this current situation, things are being inconvenienced for no reason. I've consulted with those in a decision making role for services or coin maintenance on these coins and we agree that this is the best way to move all three coins forward
These three very unique (and very different from each other) coins are a package deal. If one does not get listed, none should
I still like Poloniex, but they think BALLS and 10k are the same coin. I have respect for them, but this situation is fucking things up for us and it's not worth the time to change things because one exchange doesn't understand the difference between two coins
I respectfully ask everyone to request the same from mobydick and busoni. In this current situation, things are being inconvenienced for no reason. I've consulted with those in a decision making role for services or coin maintenance on these coins and we agree that this is the best way to move all three coins forward
These three very unique (and very different from each other) coins are a package deal. If one does not get listed, none should
What exactly does it fuck up on your back end?
March 15, 2015, 01:42:42 PM
From Poloniex News:
The following coins are being considered for delisting on 3/29/15: BALLS, CINNI, CNOTE, GDN, GML, MMXIV, MRS, NRS, SRCC, TAC, WOLF
https://twitter.com/PurePoS/status/577176891217604608 - I don't know how else to say it, while still being respectful, other than this tweet and the small sentence below
To be clear, I have no problems with Poloniex other than not wanting 10k. Still have massive respect for busoni. No hard feelings on my end, but if they don't want to support our entire project (not to mention, again, 10k is STILL on the front page of Bittrex by volume since day 1 of being listed), then this is the best solution long term
The following coins are being considered for delisting on 3/29/15: BALLS, CINNI, CNOTE, GDN, GML, MMXIV, MRS, NRS, SRCC, TAC, WOLF
https://twitter.com/PurePoS/status/577176891217604608 - I don't know how else to say it, while still being respectful, other than this tweet and the small sentence below
To be clear, I have no problems with Poloniex other than not wanting 10k. Still have massive respect for busoni. No hard feelings on my end, but if they don't want to support our entire project (not to mention, again, 10k is STILL on the front page of Bittrex by volume since day 1 of being listed), then this is the best solution long term
March 15, 2015, 01:18:41 PM
Just so you guys know, I have requested that Poloniex delist both BALLS and MMXIV. The reasoning is simple: these three coins are a package deal. Not having all 3 on the same exchanges fucks up a lot on our backend. Without getting into detail, the problems caused by having 2/3 coins listed in one place far outweigh the benefits for those two coins
I still like Poloniex, but they think BALLS and 10k are the same coin. I have respect for them, but this situation is fucking things up for us and it's not worth the time to change things because one exchange doesn't understand the difference between two coins
I respectfully ask everyone to request the same from mobydick and busoni. In this current situation, things are being inconvenienced for no reason. I've consulted with those in a decision making role for services or coin maintenance on these coins and we agree that this is the best way to move all three coins forward
These three very unique (and very different from each other) coins are a package deal. If one does not get listed, none should
I still like Poloniex, but they think BALLS and 10k are the same coin. I have respect for them, but this situation is fucking things up for us and it's not worth the time to change things because one exchange doesn't understand the difference between two coins
I respectfully ask everyone to request the same from mobydick and busoni. In this current situation, things are being inconvenienced for no reason. I've consulted with those in a decision making role for services or coin maintenance on these coins and we agree that this is the best way to move all three coins forward
These three very unique (and very different from each other) coins are a package deal. If one does not get listed, none should
Just want it to be clear that I am not trying to disrespect them at all. I actually find busoni fascinating
March 15, 2015, 12:54:39 PM
Here's the exact response, just so you guys know how they feel
Quote from: mobydick
Thanks for your interest in having Poloniex list 10k. Unfortunately for a variety of reasons, Poloniex is unlikely to add 10K in the near future. These include:
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
Hmmm... seems like they have a bunch of coins listed that, in the interest of "also running a business", should be delisted because, frankly, they are doing NOTHING for their business!
Well by their reasoning, they wouldn't pass over a coin that has been front page of Bittrex, sorted by volume, for over a month. It's a bullshit response
Indeed. I edited my post to reflect such.
March 15, 2015, 12:49:20 PM
Here's the exact response, just so you guys know how they feel
Quote from: mobydick
Thanks for your interest in having Poloniex list 10k. Unfortunately for a variety of reasons, Poloniex is unlikely to add 10K in the near future. These include:
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
Hmmm... seems like they have a bunch of coins listed that, in the interest of "also running a business", should be delisted because, frankly, they are doing NOTHING for their business!
Well by their reasoning, they wouldn't pass over a coin that has been front page of Bittrex, sorted by volume, for over a month. It's a bullshit response
We are still on the Bittrex front page while half of the coins listed on Poloniex have under .02 volume. Fucking pathetic
March 15, 2015, 12:48:36 PM
Here's the exact response, just so you guys know how they feel
Quote from: mobydick
Thanks for your interest in having Poloniex list 10k. Unfortunately for a variety of reasons, Poloniex is unlikely to add 10K in the near future. These include:
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
Hmmm... seems like they have a bunch of coins listed that, in the interest of "also running a business", should be delisted because, frankly, they are doing NOTHING for their business! If a store adds a product and it doesn't do well, they put it on clearance and never restock. But they take a chance because of potential. It costs them their initial investment, but they move on from their loses. In crypto, an exchange lists a coin. It costs them nothing (practically), but they make money, at the very least, from withdrawal fees and trading fees. If they make nothing, which is very unlikely, they delist. There is something bigger going on here.
March 15, 2015, 11:56:42 AM
Here's the exact response, just so you guys know how they feel
Quote from: mobydick
Thanks for your interest in having Poloniex list 10k. Unfortunately for a variety of reasons, Poloniex is unlikely to add 10K in the near future. These include:
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
10K appears to be another project very similar to snowballs, which we already have listed. At the time we listed it, snowballs demonstrated something new, and there was considerable interest in the market for it. Sentiment from our staff (partially reflecting that of our users as well), is that 10k isn't as interesting as Snowballs was.
10k is an "experiment" - while we love the idea of being a lab for crypto tests, we are also running a business, and at some point I need to make a choice of how likely it is that a particular market will have lasting value. Once the experiment is complete, is there a use for 10K?
Finally, I am coordinating an array of upcoming listings, and the timing for something one might deem gimmicky (crazy high lotto style staking without additional practical value) just isn't right for our indices.
Thanks for reaching out.
Moby
March 15, 2015, 10:57:06 AM
i still don't get it why you don't wanna add 10k in exchange?
Can't he see the difference between 3coins? i mean even a newbie can see that ha?
10k will rock you'll see . we gonna replace RDD DOGE and other bullshit coins without goals, (no purpose.)
Can't he see the difference between 3coins? i mean even a newbie can see that ha?
10k will rock you'll see . we gonna replace RDD DOGE and other bullshit coins without goals, (no purpose.)
Ray Charles can see the difference
March 15, 2015, 10:47:43 AM
i still don't get it why you don't wanna add 10k in exchange?
Can't he see the difference between 3coins? i mean even a newbie can see that ha?
10k will rock you'll see . we gonna replace RDD DOGE and other bullshit coins without goals, (no purpose.)
Can't he see the difference between 3coins? i mean even a newbie can see that ha?
10k will rock you'll see . we gonna replace RDD DOGE and other bullshit coins without goals, (no purpose.)
March 15, 2015, 09:57:54 AM
I just finally sent my email to Mobydick
the main part
"iGotSpots said that you referred to it as being the same as BALLS which couldn't be further from the truth. 10kcoin has 30 sec blocks and a network weight of 4 billion. has been 10,000% pos since mid way through the pow phase which ended with around 60k coins the rest have all been created through the massive 10k% distribution phase which ends at block 360k... where it's inflation will be halted by approx 90% by altering the pos rate to 10% while still giving it's users an awesome incentive to hold by incorporating a 10% chance at finding a "superblock" which will be 10k% pos return.
Yes after the fork BALLS will share the 10% standard pos return but users will only have a 1% chance of finding the massive 100k% superblocks, so they're really both quite unique... there will also be a massive difference in their money supplies as well so if anything they complement each other. iGotSpots has proven to be a determined developer and quickly address's concerns when they come up with any of his 3 coins. users should definitely be able to pick up all 3 of his coins at the same exchange. adding 10k well before it changes at block 360k would allow your users the chance to cash in on it's distribution phase."
the main part
"iGotSpots said that you referred to it as being the same as BALLS which couldn't be further from the truth. 10kcoin has 30 sec blocks and a network weight of 4 billion. has been 10,000% pos since mid way through the pow phase which ended with around 60k coins the rest have all been created through the massive 10k% distribution phase which ends at block 360k... where it's inflation will be halted by approx 90% by altering the pos rate to 10% while still giving it's users an awesome incentive to hold by incorporating a 10% chance at finding a "superblock" which will be 10k% pos return.
Yes after the fork BALLS will share the 10% standard pos return but users will only have a 1% chance of finding the massive 100k% superblocks, so they're really both quite unique... there will also be a massive difference in their money supplies as well so if anything they complement each other. iGotSpots has proven to be a determined developer and quickly address's concerns when they come up with any of his 3 coins. users should definitely be able to pick up all 3 of his coins at the same exchange. adding 10k well before it changes at block 360k would allow your users the chance to cash in on it's distribution phase."
Thanks
Just to clarify, though, BALLS will not have the flat 10% - BALLS stake rate will be the last two numbers of the timestamp, unless they are 00, which will create a 100,000% superblock. It does not have flat rates at all like 10k does
March 15, 2015, 08:56:16 AM
well i just ate 18 ur welcome
lets get anal and bpi listed ill have lots of btc ill eat up all of it
lets get anal and bpi listed ill have lots of btc ill eat up all of it
March 15, 2015, 06:55:42 AM
Until we post something else
Never fails to supprise lol March 15, 2015, 06:19:12 AM
I just finally sent my email to Mobydick
the main part
"iGotSpots said that you referred to it as being the same as BALLS which couldn't be further from the truth. 10kcoin has 30 sec blocks and a network weight of 4 billion. has been 10,000% pos since mid way through the pow phase which ended with around 60k coins the rest have all been created through the massive 10k% distribution phase which ends at block 360k... where it's inflation will be halted by approx 90% by altering the pos rate to 10% while still giving it's users an awesome incentive to hold by incorporating a 10% chance at finding a "superblock" which will be 10k% pos return.
Yes after the fork BALLS will share the 10% standard pos return but users will only have a 1% chance of finding the massive 100k% superblocks, so they're really both quite unique... there will also be a massive difference in their money supplies as well so if anything they complement each other. iGotSpots has proven to be a determined developer and quickly address's concerns when they come up with any of his 3 coins. users should definitely be able to pick up all 3 of his coins at the same exchange. adding 10k well before it changes at block 360k would allow your users the chance to cash in on it's distribution phase."
the main part
"iGotSpots said that you referred to it as being the same as BALLS which couldn't be further from the truth. 10kcoin has 30 sec blocks and a network weight of 4 billion. has been 10,000% pos since mid way through the pow phase which ended with around 60k coins the rest have all been created through the massive 10k% distribution phase which ends at block 360k... where it's inflation will be halted by approx 90% by altering the pos rate to 10% while still giving it's users an awesome incentive to hold by incorporating a 10% chance at finding a "superblock" which will be 10k% pos return.
Yes after the fork BALLS will share the 10% standard pos return but users will only have a 1% chance of finding the massive 100k% superblocks, so they're really both quite unique... there will also be a massive difference in their money supplies as well so if anything they complement each other. iGotSpots has proven to be a determined developer and quickly address's concerns when they come up with any of his 3 coins. users should definitely be able to pick up all 3 of his coins at the same exchange. adding 10k well before it changes at block 360k would allow your users the chance to cash in on it's distribution phase."
March 15, 2015, 05:59:25 AM
lol, so many experiment 10k's out there
I would be curious to see the graph of 10K inflation and how it relates to the minimum Stake and Block times.
I don't think it's a good idea to ask for your Coins to be delisted, it would make it harder later on to get them relisted and polo is a big market you would be losing.
I would be curious to see the graph of 10K inflation and how it relates to the minimum Stake and Block times.
I don't think it's a good idea to ask for your Coins to be delisted, it would make it harder later on to get them relisted and polo is a big market you would be losing.
March 15, 2015, 02:52:43 AM
i like where things are moving.
spots you really proof to have balls asking echanges to DElist coins. But that proofs that you see the Three as a package which is a great and makes delisting the other two the right decision. perhaps they change their mind now they see your serious.
love this type of attitude beeing respectful but not hanging on the nuts of everyone. Defenatly is fun to watch. keep up man.
spots you really proof to have balls asking echanges to DElist coins. But that proofs that you see the Three as a package which is a great and makes delisting the other two the right decision. perhaps they change their mind now they see your serious.
love this type of attitude beeing respectful but not hanging on the nuts of everyone. Defenatly is fun to watch. keep up man.
March 15, 2015, 01:12:53 AM
Until we post something else
Great we love the surprise elements..
I am off to make breaky now, stakes like a charm 0k..lovin' it betta than mcdonalds lol. 
Jump to: