Looks like the voting has dropped off by a lot in the last 2-3 days on mintpal? Everyone must be enjoying the weekend, hopefully it picks up again during the week.
I am always looking at the coins in the top 20 on mintpal voting list, I think Octo gained 4-5 places on Mintpal even though it also had votes removed but also noticed the voting rate by the community has dropped off 90% over the weekend.
I have a feeling they are just removing a certain percentage from all of the coins... even if there is no evidence of fraudulent voting... to discourage fraudulent voting. If somebody is trying to cheat the system and sees votes removed it may discourage them even if it's basically a bluff. Obviously MintPal is hoping more people will pay for votes directly.
I noticed Murraycoin even had hundreds of votes removed at some point last week; Murraycoin only received about 7 votes in the past 2 weeks total so obviously there was no foul play going on (yet it was penalized). Don't let the removed votes discourage you from voting but do make sure you are only voting once/hour per IP address. It's ridiculous that MintPal uses the IP to determine uniqueness and penalties since, for example, several people in my office have been voting for OctoCoin and we're all on the same IP address. Since the penalties hit I just told them they might want to take a break on voting from the office (until I realized everything appears to have been penalized).
Annoying but as long as we keep grinding it out that's all that matters. Honestly MintPal will surely cause a massive price spike so for people looking to unload a few coins it's more important than for people like myself who are just looking for more stability and ease of acquisition. If the devs hadn't made a statement a while back about requiring MintPal for one of their services I'd probably still be voting for Murraycoin (despite already trading on Cryptsy) - I kind of like the fact that 888 is still flying somewhat under the radar despite being one of the most promising coins there is right now. Have to wonder if that's by design as distribution is getting wider and wider every day.
Sadly, it seems Mintpal, like so many others of these pop-up exchanges, is inherently corrupt. Maybe it didn't start out that way, maybe the money they made turned them that way but either way it stinks, this is ALL about a drive for paid votes and your observation with Murraycoin proves it. Somebody recently posted a bot voting script in our Reddit pages and suggested Reddcoin voters have been encouraged to use it. I actually don't see the problem with this, you are allowed one vote per hour, it's not possible for a human being to be awake long term for a part of every hour of every day without running into serious health problems. Believe me as a sufferer of both central and obstructive sleep apnoea I know!
IF somebody found a way to make their vote count whilst they slept why is that such a problem? if it is, give 24 votes per 24 hours or make it one vote per 24 hours and then there is no excuse for randomly removing several hundred votes from a coin. Some of those votes will have been paid for so in a normal walk of life users who have paid for them may well have a case for fraud in a court of law. If any of these exchanges have regulators it would be interesting to run that by them.
They should either move to full paid votes in which case they will get every shit/scam coin under the sun passing through their books and make a fortune but have a business that lasts 6 months tops OR they should make it properly democratic. One way to do that would be to take a random sample of the user base and send them out an e-vote with the option to choose one coin from the available list (or maybe a 1/2/3 weighted preference), count the returned votes after 12 hours and add them, then repeat for the next round. Take the top coin each week as usual.
Users aren't perfect, but neither are exchanges, users want 'their' coin to win of course so that they can individually make money. Who is the bigger evil here? Cunning users or a gluttonous exchange? either way, something has to change.