[ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 203.

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

with rawintensity not divisible by worksize, i was banned from my pool. i wasn't aware it will cause issue.

Code:

2015-11-01 00:03:33 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 2000/41394 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-11-01 00:03:33 [pool] (Thread 1) Banned WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

and now with rawintensity at 2048 and worksize at 16, hashrate is still weak 540h/s but rejected are less.

Code:

[00:28:29] Share accepted:  51/53 (96.23%)
[00:28:29] Total Hashrate: 542.37H/s

opennux

full member

Activity: 231

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: smooth on October 31, 2015, 01:48:58 PM

Looks like the network is getting pretty healthy. I see a lot more nodes including nodes some new nodes accepting incoming connections. Minergate is still >50% but down considerably from before. Please continue to deploy nodes and spread out the hash rate!

I'm amazed people still mine at minergate...

It was recommended in the OP up until just a few weeks ago.

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

i guess this one is a stale.

Code:

[23:21:13] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 546.02H/s
[23:21:13] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: Detected new job, regenerating work.
[23:21:13] Request: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "128613995830528", "job_id": "553629737067967", "nonce": "741a0000", "result": "155f66bfda238ae34751b774af4b593d5ddac97b2dcaf2257f2441c2ce0cbaa2"}, "id": 1}
[23:21:13] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Low difficulty share"}}
[23:21:13] Share rejected ((null)): 46/49 (93.88%)
[23:21:13] Total Hashrate: 546.02H/s
[23:21:17] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s
[23:21:20] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: SHARE found (nonce 0x0000088E)!
[23:21:20] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 545.88H/s
[23:21:22] Request: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "128613995830528", "job_id": "553629737067967", "nonce": "8e080000", "result": "4c9949095e8213cd9d7897cc2e779699703d8bf305f82bafef31202a1ffa0000"}, "id": 1}
[23:21:22] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}
[23:21:22] Share accepted: 47/50 (94.00%)

on this test, rejected are ~5% (vs 14% on the first run and ~0% with cpu miner)
still no problems with reconnection

@Wolf0 : i configured my 7950 with rawintensity at 2112 (max accepted before error -61) and worksize at 256. my hashrate look weak (comparing other report)

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: smooth on October 31, 2015, 05:21:51 PM

Okay as long as it doesn't cause banning and the net hash rate is decent then it seems acceptable.

It's not to me. I'll be fixing it.

Oh okay, that's even better. I misinterpreted your comment as suggesting it wasn't worth fixing. I look forward to the improved version then.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Okay as long as it doesn't cause banning and the net hash rate is decent then it seems acceptable.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: ?? on ??

I said why earlier - it says low diff share no matter what, but it's stale.

Does it send significantly more of these than other miners? If so it seems that might fail because if you send enough bad shares you probably get banned? (Mostly guessing as I don't know exactly how the pool software works.)

If it is comparable to other miners then I don't see a problem.

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

updating binary of wolf's gpu miner at https://github.com/Arux-BTT/wolf-aeon-miner/releases
reconnection to pool seems to be fine

Code:

[22:17:13] Stratum connection to pool timed out.
[22:17:14] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s

[22:17:14] Reconnected to pool... authenticating...
[22:17:14] Request: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41
hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs",
 "pass": "x", "agent": "wolf-xmr-miner/0.1"}, "id": 1}

[22:17:14] Reconnected to pool.
[22:17:14] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"8
19246329274028","job":{"blob":"0100cdded4b105ad43d30a2046242d15dd927ead7b922a69c
5f4e994fd1fdd5f3f1bb51d6ec40f000000007372d3433fc80a1330aaf15eafd5a18281c084e1b0a
f21c7bf76100c93e8729901","job_id":"711614679871127","target":"9bc42000"},"status
":"OK"}}

[22:17:18] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s

[22:17:18] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: Detected new job, regenerating
work.
[22:17:22] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: SHARE found (nonce 0x000007E3)!

[22:17:22] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s

[22:17:23] Request: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "819246329274028", "jo
b_id": "711614679871127", "nonce": "e3070000", "result": "ae7d49d7b6333872a1fe63
ca4d4dee8ed92746879496dc27e6b0a139da770600"}, "id": 1}

[22:17:23] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status
":"OK"}}

[22:17:23] Share accepted: 9/10 (90.00%)

first test, for a unknown reason, i have some rejected shares

Code:

2015-10-31 22:36:49 [pool] (Thread 1) Retargetting difficulty 2000 to 4000 for WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Rejected low difficulty share of 4 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Share trust broken by WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Rejected low difficulty share of 2 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Share trust broken by WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:10 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:10 [pool] (Thread 1) Rejected low difficulty share of 5 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:10 [pool] (Thread 1) Share trust broken by WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:21 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:21 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 4000/12170 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 4000/4302 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 4000/5383 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Looks like the network is getting pretty healthy. I see a lot more nodes including nodes some new nodes accepting incoming connections. Minergate is still >50% but down considerably from before. Please continue to deploy nodes and spread out the hash rate!

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: ?? on ??

Pushed a fixed AEON miner to GitHub - reconnecting should work now. Also updated the example config.

Thanks Wolf0! Don't forget you still have a bounty coming. Once we get some tests that it does work it can be paid out.

americanpegasus

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 504

jwinterm, i'm not a fan of the fuzzy versions but the clean one up top looks awesome! i'd probably tweak it by lightening up the colors a little bit. If we added a little brightness and contrast (to liven up the blue and grey) then we have a gorgeous logo on par with the serious technology that belies it. Great work with this, and thanks.

I have high hopes for this blockchain in the future! I'm sure we won't just serve as a valuable testbed for CN ideas but perhaps will even establish a personality of our own over time.

joshafest

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

ok...see on github

Factor0008

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Damn forgot to check on github >.<

It's work and apply the shares now,

ty for the support W0lf

joshafest

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

well cryptonight-lite algo seem to be good

AnonCoinTwitter

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

The historical hashrate chart is interesting. Almost nobody was mining until smooth took over. Clear uptrend in mining since August.

http://chainradar.com/aeon/chart

bitl0ck

sr. member

Activity: 240

Merit: 250

20k aeon for sale, pm me with offers, we can use smooth as escrow.

Factor0008

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Quote from: Arux on October 29, 2015, 03:05:10 PM

i used old version of cryptonight-lite.cl, groestl256.cl, jh.cl and wolf-aes.cl in the initial zip uploaded at https://github.com/Arux-BTT/wolf-aeon-miner/releases
the error is now corrected, please download the actual archive and overwrite old files. Sorry.

Hi everyone,
ik this is my first message, but i've keeping my eye around the forum for awhile and, before launch this post asking help, i searched to figure it out before bothering with silly question....

Arux, nice work on the miner but it seems i'm getting Error 61 (which i could find it's something about auto-tune/confg of your gpu hardware on the miner/) since my graphic card is a low budget and the remains of some coins i could gather from a work, i started decreasing one by one to see if, even starts the miner.
.
.
#conf so far, but still crashes sometimes (too scary to see if it's stays ok Tongue

)#R7 240 amd
"name": "AEON",
            "devices":
            [
               {
               "index": 0,
               "corefreq": 500,
               "memfreq": 1250,
               "fanspeed": 75,
               "powertune": 10,

               "threads": 1,
               "rawintensity": 1000,
               "worksize": 16
               }

It do starts, and show this another error

it goes from line 226 to 338: warning: argument of type "uchar *" is incompatible with parameter of type "unit *"

after awhile, it shows hash rate (138h/s) p:s max that i've ever achieved with other miners was around 85-100 not that much... but in your pool doesn't show any work from my address....

may i please get some help? ^^'''

joshafest

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

yes nice logo..

generalizethis

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1036

Facts are more efficient than fud

Quote from: jwinterm on October 30, 2015, 09:06:23 PM

Playing around in blender:

aeon with hair!

Here's an idea for a video media logo. Why not write the logo on a doodle pad and erase it (but the logo shows up on another doodle pad in frame Wink

) as a simple illustration of aeon's capabilities. The hair thing got me thinking of the old style magnetic shaving pads where you made hair lines on a man's face, but aeon is too edgy for the old style.

Nice logos jwinterm. Very clean design.

jwinterm

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1116

Playing around in blender:

aeon with hair!

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

i used old version of cryptonight-lite.cl, groestl256.cl, jh.cl and wolf-aes.cl in the initial zip uploaded at https://github.com/Arux-BTT/wolf-aeon-miner/releases
the error is now corrected, please download the actual archive and overwrite old files. Sorry.

Topic: [ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 203. (Read 625666 times)