[ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 243.

nioc

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Arux on August 02, 2015, 03:43:02 AM

Quote from: smooth on August 02, 2015, 02:31:59 AM

Quote from: nioc on August 01, 2015, 04:41:13 PM

Quote from: Arux on August 01, 2015, 03:55:31 PM

Minimum Payment Threshold: 0.050 AEON

The technical aspects I know little about. It just seemed to me that the threshold is rather small and dusty.

Yes I agree it would be better to set it higher especially with the value and difficulty as low as it is.

0.05 is something like 0.0000025 BTC

I will be bumping up the default transaction fees to a more realistic level and improving handling of transaction fees generally once everything is stable after the hard fork

updated
Minimum Payment Threshold: ~~0.050~~ --> 0.500
Denomination Unit: ~~0.001~~ --> 0.010
Transfer Fee : ~~0.0010~~ --> 0.000001 (0.0000 will be displayed)

On the payments page of your pool it is listed as

Minimum Payment Threshold: 0.100 AEON
Denomination Unit: 0.100 AEON

MoneroMooo

legendary

Activity: 1276

Merit: 1001

Quote from: bitl0ck on August 04, 2015, 04:06:29 PM

Where can i find the cryptonight lite miner source code to able to mine on linux?

Thank you

Wolf's (AES-NI): https://github.com/moneromooo/cpuminer-multi
Tsiv's (GPU, nvidia): https://github.com/moneromooo/ccminer-cryptonight
Lucas Jones' (CPUs without AES-NI): https://github.com/iamsmooth/cpuminer-multi

bitl0ck

sr. member

Activity: 240

Merit: 250

Where can i find the cryptonight lite miner source code to able to mine on linux?

Thank you

nioc

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Arux on August 04, 2015, 12:17:36 PM

Quote from: nioc on August 04, 2015, 11:24:56 AM

Quote from: smooth on August 04, 2015, 11:16:29 AM

Quote from: nioc on August 04, 2015, 11:13:27 AM

I am useing -a cryptonight-lite

Hmm. Maybe there is a bug in it. Did you try Wolfs?

No because of Arux's posting...............

use non-AES-NI on old cpu (else you will get a message 'cpu not supported")

That be LucasJones AFAIK. Wolf's non AES-NI never worked for me in the past.

Back to work I go, ohhhh

my apologies, LucasJones binary don't work as expected. there is an error but i still don't know wich one.

Wolf binaries are OK.
AES-NI optimization for recent hardware and non AES-NI for older.

Thank you Arux. I am using Wolf's non AES-NI and it is working.

MoneroMooo

legendary

Activity: 1276

Merit: 1001

exciter0: update your daemon (if you can compile it, I'm not sure if there's a binary with the latest source). I've just checked the source and the diff change was done only recently.

Arux: in pages/home.html, find the line:

updateText('networkHashrate', getReadableHashRateString(lastStats.network.difficulty / 60) + '/sec')

and replace 60 with 240 (new block target).

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: exciter0 on August 04, 2015, 03:32:23 PM

How about your pools reported hashrate? It looks a bit weird...

Code:

Hash Rate: 201.57 KH/sec

My daemon shows over 800Kh/s

Code:

diff
2015-Aug-04 13:28:47.565403 BH: 592102, DIFF: 49228419, HR: 820473 H/s

for me, it's the opposite
my pool shows 808kh/s and my daemon 202kh/s, there is a factor 4 between them.

exciter0

member

Activity: 115

Merit: 10

How about your pools reported hashrate? It looks a bit weird...

Code:

Hash Rate: 201.57 KH/sec

My daemon shows over 800Kh/s

Code:

diff
2015-Aug-04 13:28:47.565403 BH: 592102, DIFF: 49228419, HR: 820473 H/s

Quote from: MoneroMooo on August 04, 2015, 02:41:12 PM

Quote from: btcluka on August 04, 2015, 02:14:37 PM

2015-Aug-04 21:06:42.603225 [P2P9][74.91.30.186:11180 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 783 -> 592063 [591280 blocks behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started

aeon 0.9.0.0 win64

Moo's pool say now is 592062
Huh

?

Shouldn't matter for just one off like that. The stats on the pool can be late by like half a minute (the stats thread gathering data and refreshing the compressed bundle every N seconds, the web page's timer downloading that bundle every N seconds, etc).

MoneroMooo

legendary

Activity: 1276

Merit: 1001

Quote from: btcluka on August 04, 2015, 02:14:37 PM

2015-Aug-04 21:06:42.603225 [P2P9][74.91.30.186:11180 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 783 -> 592063 [591280 blocks behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started

aeon 0.9.0.0 win64

Moo's pool say now is 592062
Huh

?

Shouldn't matter for just one off like that. The stats on the pool can be late by like half a minute (the stats thread gathering data and refreshing the compressed bundle every N seconds, the web page's timer downloading that bundle every N seconds, etc).

btcluka

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

2015-Aug-04 21:06:42.603225 [P2P9][74.91.30.186:11180 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 783 -> 592063 [591280 blocks behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started

aeon 0.9.0.0 win64

Moo's pool say now is 592062
Huh

?

BoscoMurray

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Quote from: myagui on August 04, 2015, 01:29:55 PM

Quote from: BoscoMurray on August 04, 2015, 01:12:00 PM

Is http://aeonpool.mooo.com/ on the correct chain? My miner says it's detecting new blocks and finding shares, but the front page says no block found for an hour.

This pool has what looks like the correct info on the front page: http://52.8.47.33:8080/

You probably just need to do a proper browser refresh. I've seen pool stats not getting updated often (browser fault?).
Mooo's pool is definitely on the correct chain, and it has found a few blocks since the fork (current round is an unlucky one though, at ~40 minutes at the moment).

Indeed, hard refresh did the job. Rookie mistake..

BoscoMurray

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Quote from: nikos64 on August 04, 2015, 01:37:13 PM

Quote from: BoscoMurray on August 04, 2015, 12:45:32 PM

AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads using wolf's updated miner is giving ~700H/s. Thanks for compiling this for us losers still using windies!

I'd love an AMD GPU miner for windies. I'll go give the Claymore thread another nudge...

AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads @4GHz is at 850 h/s. Claymore's can easily beat 1 Kh/s.

Mine is @3.5GHz. I'm trying to keep the heat and noise down

nikos64

sr. member

Activity: 283

Merit: 250

Quote from: BoscoMurray on August 04, 2015, 12:45:32 PM

AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads using wolf's updated miner is giving ~700H/s. Thanks for compiling this for us losers still using windies!

I'd love an AMD GPU miner for windies. I'll go give the Claymore thread another nudge...

AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads @4GHz is at 850 h/s. Claymore's can easily beat 1 Kh/s.

MoneroMooo

legendary

Activity: 1276

Merit: 1001

Yes, it's as Myagui said. Last block 40 minutes ago. Blocks are now targetted a 4 minutes, and I've lost about half of the miner hash from people who haven't updated yet, so block finding rate on the pool has gone down a lot. On the plus side, we get 40 AEON per block instead of 10

I've seen the not-refreshing-problem, no idea what it is about as I'm not super clued in to Javascript/browser tech.

myagui

legendary

Activity: 1154

Merit: 1001

Quote from: BoscoMurray on August 04, 2015, 01:12:00 PM

Is http://aeonpool.mooo.com/ on the correct chain? My miner says it's detecting new blocks and finding shares, but the front page says no block found for an hour.

This pool has what looks like the correct info on the front page: http://52.8.47.33:8080/

You probably just need to do a proper browser refresh. I've seen pool stats not getting updated often (browser fault?).
Mooo's pool is definitely on the correct chain, and it has found a few blocks since the fork (current round is an unlucky one though, at ~40 minutes at the moment).

BoscoMurray

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Is http://aeonpool.mooo.com/ on the correct chain? My miner says it's detecting new blocks and finding shares, but the front page says no block found for an hour.

This pool has what looks like the correct info on the front page: http://52.8.47.33:8080/

BoscoMurray

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads using wolf's updated miner is giving ~700H/s. Thanks for compiling this for us losers still using windies!

I'd love an AMD GPU miner for windies. I'll go give the Claymore thread another nudge...

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: papa_lazzarou on August 04, 2015, 12:23:32 PM

Did you guys notify chainradar? It seems they are on the wrong fork.

Height 592037

Edit: I have dropped them a line.

Yes they've been notified, yes they are on the wrong fork.

papa_lazzarou

hero member

Activity: 649

Merit: 500

Did you guys notify chainradar? It seems they are on the wrong fork.

Height 592037

Edit: I have dropped them a line.

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: smooth on August 04, 2015, 12:13:02 PM

Thanks to MoneroMooo who identified the bug in cpuminer-multi. I pushed the fix to my repo

ok, no time to build a new w64 binary now, i will see later.

meanwhile, cpumine is ok on windows with wolf's binaries.

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: nioc on August 04, 2015, 11:24:56 AM

Quote from: smooth on August 04, 2015, 11:16:29 AM

Quote from: nioc on August 04, 2015, 11:13:27 AM

I am useing -a cryptonight-lite

Hmm. Maybe there is a bug in it. Did you try Wolfs?

No because of Arux's posting...............

use non-AES-NI on old cpu (else you will get a message 'cpu not supported")

That be LucasJones AFAIK. Wolf's non AES-NI never worked for me in the past.

Back to work I go, ohhhh

my apologies, LucasJones binary don't work as expected. there is an error but i still don't know wich one.

Wolf binaries are OK.
AES-NI optimization for recent hardware and non AES-NI for older.

Topic: [ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 243. (Read 625666 times)