I'm not especially a fan of names like xxx-note, xxx-coin, xxx-shares, etc.
I'm also not especially a fan of coins that do frequent rebrands for whatever reasons (generally not good ones).
I also think it would be better if/when we decide to rebrand later that we not have a history of frivolous rebrands.
I think the current branding is okay, certainly not terrible enough to justify a rebrand right now. As things develop later its something we might do, in a well-managed way (most rebrands by other coins have been done terribly from a marketing perspective imo).
I'm also not especially a fan of coins that do frequent rebrands for whatever reasons (generally not good ones).
I also think it would be better if/when we decide to rebrand later that we not have a history of frivolous rebrands.
I think the current branding is okay, certainly not terrible enough to justify a rebrand right now. As things develop later its something we might do, in a well-managed way (most rebrands by other coins have been done terribly from a marketing perspective imo).
I just hope poloniex will re-list AEON.
I have every expectation there will be exchange listings (though not going to mention any specific exchanges until they either commit publicly or announce it themselves) after the first hard fork is complete, which now appears to be on track to happen fairly soon. Once I successfully test the new pool modifications and confirm the build process with Arux, I will tag a new release with a specified block height for the fork.
Awesome smooth.
I buy in this coin because of your work on Monero.
Please evaluate the work and prospects of this coin carefully. I encourage no one to buy anything based on my name or reputation alone, none of which can guarantee success. Do your own homework, assess your risk tolerance, and invest accordingly (if at all).
