This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
Yes
Useful masternodes are a very very refreshing thing. 
Topic: [ANN] Akroma - Cryptocurrency. Smarter. (Smart Contracts. Masternodes. Oracles.) - page 26. (Read 44414 times)
February 03, 2018, 09:52:21 AM
Yes
Useful masternodes are a very very refreshing thing. February 03, 2018, 09:19:54 AM
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
Pirl already has masternode and smart contracts integration since november.But pirl has unlimited supply and no block reward halving...
February 03, 2018, 08:05:21 AM
Russian ANN thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-akroma-smart-contracts-masternodes-oracles-2845138
0xd4C7c40fBF3e1eeB2640bF233959524EFc035CF9
In case of lack of coins or will to pay any bounty, a simple "thank you" would be nice
0xd4C7c40fBF3e1eeB2640bF233959524EFc035CF9
In case of lack of coins or will to pay any bounty, a simple "thank you" would be nice
February 03, 2018, 08:03:49 AM
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
Pirl already has masternode and smart contracts integration since november.But pirl has unlimited supply and no block reward halving...
February 03, 2018, 07:13:30 AM
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
February 03, 2018, 07:00:50 AM
Is there a way to get this currency and setup a master or is it too early ??
It's too early"Masternode Platform (in development, est Q1)"
February 02, 2018, 08:00:01 PM
Is there a way to get this currency and setup a master or is it too early ??
February 02, 2018, 07:49:30 PM
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this).
Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running.
Nobody with any real power was mining it.
I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it.
I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate.
Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped.
As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners.
About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s..
By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything.
Doesn't really matter if it was CPU or GPU mined and what power they had. Difficulty adjusts, block time is targeted to 10s and diff started at ~0 if I'm not mistaken.
If you're the only miner starting on a chain you get the same reward no matter your hash rate --> all blocks.
The first miner mined more than 1000 blocks an hour for the first few hours from what I can see, which gives a block time lower than 3.6 seconds initially. It later adjusted as diff rose.
How can you claim "So technically nobody really missed out on anything." when:
- Chain was almost halfway to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced on Medium?
- Chain was almost 2/3 to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced here.
Yes, that hard fork has since been postponed but argument is still as valid.
I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎
I thought this coin was cool but like you said it's already mining like it's been out for 1 year.
Who ever mined it early made out who ever is mining now is wasting hash power
Don't see what you're whining about. Not even 1% of the total coin supply has been mined. It's still very early days.
February 02, 2018, 06:26:57 PM
So no exchanges yet and they ignored Announcements here?? Why should we invest in this??
pump and dump. 
You got banned from the discord for spamming your silly escrow discord. This DEV team is very active and transparent and posts everything they do on their social media links below.
Website: https://akroma.io/
Web Wallet: https://wallet.akroma.io/
Desktop and mobile wallets are currently being worked on
Network Stats: https://stats.akroma.io/
Block Explorer: https://explorer.akroma.io/
Mining Pools:
- http://aka.miningpeon.net/
- http://akroma.minerpool.net/
- http://akroma.cryptopools.info/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/akroma_io
Medium: https://medium.com/akroma
Github: https://github.com/akroma-project
Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/Akroma_Network
February 02, 2018, 05:35:06 PM
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this).
Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running.
Nobody with any real power was mining it.
I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it.
I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate.
Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped.
As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners.
About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s..
By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything.
Doesn't really matter if it was CPU or GPU mined and what power they had. Difficulty adjusts, block time is targeted to 10s and diff started at ~0 if I'm not mistaken.
If you're the only miner starting on a chain you get the same reward no matter your hash rate --> all blocks.
The first miner mined more than 1000 blocks an hour for the first few hours from what I can see, which gives a block time lower than 3.6 seconds initially. It later adjusted as diff rose.
How can you claim "So technically nobody really missed out on anything." when:
- Chain was almost halfway to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced on Medium?
- Chain was almost 2/3 to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced here.
Yes, that hard fork has since been postponed but argument is still as valid.
I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎
I thought this coin was cool but like you said it's already mining like it's been out for 1 year.
Who ever mined it early made out who ever is mining now is wasting hash power
February 02, 2018, 03:41:03 PM
I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎
There is no other explanation, except that he premined a large percent of this coin supply and wants to dump his bags at high price, that's why you can see posts like thisTired of shit-coins?
Tired of pajeet anonymous developers?
Tired of Copy-paste projects?
Tired of Presale Masternodes?
Tired of Premine?
Look no further... Real team... Real developers... Real project.
Real vision and future!!!
Get in before the moon mission boys!
Tired of pajeet anonymous developers?
Tired of Copy-paste projects?
Tired of Presale Masternodes?
Tired of Premine?
Look no further... Real team... Real developers... Real project.
Real vision and future!!!
Get in before the moon mission boys!
February 02, 2018, 01:59:01 PM
Mining started around the 25th of January lol. It has been mining for over a week.
No, first block was Jan 19th around 5:39 PM:
https://explorer.akroma.io/block/1
February 02, 2018, 01:56:45 PM
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this).
Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running.
Nobody with any real power was mining it.
I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it.
I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate.
Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped.
As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners.
About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s..
By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything.
Doesn't really matter if it was CPU or GPU mined and what power they had. Difficulty adjusts, block time is targeted to 10s and diff started at ~0 if I'm not mistaken.
If you're the only miner starting on a chain you get the same reward no matter your hash rate --> all blocks.
The first miner mined more than 1000 blocks an hour for the first few hours from what I can see, which gives a block time lower than 3.6 seconds initially. It later adjusted as diff rose.
How can you claim "So technically nobody really missed out on anything." when:
- Chain was almost halfway to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced on Medium?
- Chain was almost 2/3 to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced here.
Yes, that hard fork has since been postponed but argument is still as valid.
I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎
February 02, 2018, 12:00:44 PM
Mining started around the 25th of January lol. It has been mining for over a week.
You wrong, its started 19.01 February 02, 2018, 12:00:18 PM
Sorry, new to mining in general, but AKA seems very interesting...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this).
Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running.
Nobody with any real power was mining it.
I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it.
I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate.
Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped.
As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners.
About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s..
By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything.
February 02, 2018, 09:21:07 AM
Sorry, new to mining in general, but AKA seems very interesting...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
Can we have an "official" statement regarding this?
true/false
Thank you
Mining started around the 25th of January lol. It has been mining for over a week.
February 02, 2018, 08:33:10 AM
Sorry, new to mining in general, but AKA seems very interesting...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
Can we have an "official" statement regarding this?
true/false
Thank you
February 02, 2018, 07:31:41 AM
Sorry, new to mining in general, but AKA seems very interesting...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
Thank you for the very detailed answer. Makes more sense now...
February 02, 2018, 06:15:17 AM
So no exchanges yet and they ignored Announcements here?? Why should we invest in this??
I believe they are only communication through Medium, Twitter and discord.
I believe Medium was where they "announced". Was a few days after mining started though.
February 02, 2018, 05:01:29 AM
What is the going rate for Akroma at the moment? Looks like a very interesting project. I will be sure to keep an eye on this.
Jump to: