Topic: [ANN] ARBIT COIN|SHA256| POD VERIFIED |AR/VR WALLET|POS|VOICE 2FA|EXCHANGES - page 30. (Read 66500 times)

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:49:43 PM

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:36:11 PM

Quote from: ocminer on May 15, 2015, 01:00:37 PM

Just wanted to post that the escrow service will evenly distribute the 10,000 ARBit coins proportional to how many miners or (workers) are on the pools. We will be purchasing the ARBITCOINS out of our BTC and the escrow will dispersed them to the pools for miner payouts. Our dedication to the success of the miners, pools, traders and project is paramount.

6.4% Suchpool
87.1% Suprnova
6.4% minerpools

Active workers and time stamps

Suchpool: 7 (time stamp 12:15PM EST)
Suprnova: 95 (time stamp 12:16PM EST)
minerpools: 7 (time stamp 12:17PM EST)

You do not mistake in the calculation of interest? Suchpool at the start had a 60%. Onbyl leader to block 536

To be fair, it will be an even distribution according to how many miners or workers are on the pool at the time-stamp done with the escrow service. If you have a better solution let me know. my interest is just to make sure the community is taken care of, Thanks.

See. You are looking at a particular point in time. And it is necessary to look at the first 100 or 200 units, after a successful start. I think it would be fair.

The pools just got up and running at the 200th block or so. Technically there was no one on the pools because of the source being repaired. At what time do we gauge the most even and fair distribution to the miners at the pool. We figured it would be best to base it on workers as that would guarantee an even split.

I agree here.. Some folks probably cancelled their nicehash orders after they saw the 200 blocks insta-mine but jumped back on later when they saw the dev will reimburse for the "lost" blocks. So if I would pay that out based on the old stats, those miners would have a disadvantage.

I think the best way will be: After I receive the coins, I pay out a bonus per block over a certain time until the funds are depleted.. So for example if a normal block has 1000 coins value, i'd pay 1100 coins (100 coins bonus, or 10%) until the "bonus" funds are depleted. everyone can then decide if they want that extra coins or not by increasing/decreasing hashing power. The "instamined" blocks value would be distributed again.

Yeah. That makes the most sense.

OC i am agree with u but one confusion, if for the miners order on NH ran out at the time u get those Arbits than how he will get that bonus. since someof them cancelled their orders and than placed order again which will last for few hrs ?

ltcrstrbrt

legendary

Activity: 1573

Merit: 1057

The fairest solution is to pay those "instamined" blocks, according to time-stamp and hash power of each miner at that time

just remember that there are miners who couldn't cancel mining rent orders and right now they have less hours or low hash power.

Starin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Infected Mushroom

Thanks YoBit. Fast as always. Cool

seedooroff

sr. member

Activity: 343

Merit: 250

I think that we will not see justice. Those who put the power to disperse the complexity while maintaining expensive Mining growth rates, I feel will get nothing. This is the road to death coins.

ltcrstrbrt

legendary

Activity: 1573

Merit: 1057

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:49:43 PM

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:36:11 PM

Just wanted to post that the escrow service will evenly distribute the 10,000 ARBit coins proportional to how many miners or (workers) are on the pools. We will be purchasing the ARBITCOINS out of our BTC and the escrow will dispersed them to the pools for miner payouts. Our dedication to the success of the miners, pools, traders and project is paramount.

6.4% Suchpool
87.1% Suprnova
6.4% minerpools

Active workers and time stamps

Suchpool: 7 (time stamp 12:15PM EST)
Suprnova: 95 (time stamp 12:16PM EST)
minerpools: 7 (time stamp 12:17PM EST)

You do not mistake in the calculation of interest? Suchpool at the start had a 60%. Onbyl leader to block 536

To be fair, it will be an even distribution according to how many miners or workers are on the pool at the time-stamp done with the escrow service. If you have a better solution let me know. my interest is just to make sure the community is taken care of, Thanks.

See. You are looking at a particular point in time. And it is necessary to look at the first 100 or 200 units, after a successful start. I think it would be fair.

The pools just got up and running at the 200th block or so. Technically there was no one on the pools because of the source being repaired. At what time do we gauge the most even and fair distribution to the miners at the pool. We figured it would be best to base it on workers as that would guarantee an even split.

I agree here.. Some folks probably cancelled their nicehash orders after they saw the 200 blocks insta-mine but jumped back on later when they saw the dev will reimburse for the "lost" blocks. So if I would pay that out based on the old stats, those miners would have a disadvantage.

I think the best way will be: After I receive the coins, I pay out a bonus per block over a certain time until the funds are depleted.. So for example if a normal block has 1000 coins value, i'd pay 1100 coins (100 coins bonus, or 10%) until the "bonus" funds are depleted. everyone can then decide if they want that extra coins or not by increasing/decreasing hashing power. The "instamined" blocks value would be distributed again.

There are miners with low hash power then at time-stamp

so this solution is not so fair

anarchyx914

sr. member

Activity: 338

Merit: 251

What was the ICO cost of this per coin?

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:49:43 PM

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:36:11 PM

Just wanted to post that the escrow service will evenly distribute the 10,000 ARBit coins proportional to how many miners or (workers) are on the pools. We will be purchasing the ARBITCOINS out of our BTC and the escrow will dispersed them to the pools for miner payouts. Our dedication to the success of the miners, pools, traders and project is paramount.

6.4% Suchpool
87.1% Suprnova
6.4% minerpools

Active workers and time stamps

Suchpool: 7 (time stamp 12:15PM EST)
Suprnova: 95 (time stamp 12:16PM EST)
minerpools: 7 (time stamp 12:17PM EST)

You do not mistake in the calculation of interest? Suchpool at the start had a 60%. Onbyl leader to block 536

To be fair, it will be an even distribution according to how many miners or workers are on the pool at the time-stamp done with the escrow service. If you have a better solution let me know. my interest is just to make sure the community is taken care of, Thanks.

See. You are looking at a particular point in time. And it is necessary to look at the first 100 or 200 units, after a successful start. I think it would be fair.

The pools just got up and running at the 200th block or so. Technically there was no one on the pools because of the source being repaired. At what time do we gauge the most even and fair distribution to the miners at the pool. We figured it would be best to base it on workers as that would guarantee an even split.

I agree here.. Some folks probably cancelled their nicehash orders after they saw the 200 blocks insta-mine but jumped back on later when they saw the dev will reimburse for the "lost" blocks. So if I would pay that out based on the old stats, those miners would have a disadvantage.

I think the best way will be: After I receive the coins, I pay out a bonus per block over a certain time until the funds are depleted.. So for example if a normal block has 1000 coins value, i'd pay 1100 coins (100 coins bonus, or 10%) until the "bonus" funds are depleted. everyone can then decide if they want that extra coins or not by increasing/decreasing hashing power. The "instamined" blocks value would be distributed again.

seedooroff

sr. member

Activity: 343

Merit: 250

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:49:43 PM

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:36:11 PM

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:54:43 PM

Just wanted to post that the escrow service will evenly distribute the 10,000 ARBit coins proportional to how many miners or (workers) are on the pools. We will be purchasing the ARBITCOINS out of our BTC and the escrow will dispersed them to the pools for miner payouts. Our dedication to the success of the miners, pools, traders and project is paramount.

6.4% Suchpool
87.1% Suprnova
6.4% minerpools

Active workers and time stamps

Suchpool: 7 (time stamp 12:15PM EST)
Suprnova: 95 (time stamp 12:16PM EST)
minerpools: 7 (time stamp 12:17PM EST)

You do not mistake in the calculation of interest? Suchpool at the start had a 60%. Onbyl leader to block 536

To be fair, it will be an even distribution according to how many miners or workers are on the pool at the time-stamp done with the escrow service. If you have a better solution let me know. my interest is just to make sure the community is taken care of, Thanks.

See. You are looking at a particular point in time. And it is necessary to look at the first 100 or 200 units, after a successful start. I think it would be fair.

The pools just got up and running at the 200th block or so. Technically there was no one on the pools because of the source being repaired. At what time do we gauge the most even and fair distribution to the miners at the pool. We figured it would be best to base it on workers as that would guarantee an even split.

Then why do I have the coins more than mined suprpool?
who do you think gave 2 PTH?

ltcrstrbrt

legendary

Activity: 1573

Merit: 1057

Quote from: ltcrstrbrt on May 15, 2015, 12:52:34 PM

how will be distribuited those? based on the hash rate of each miner at time-stamp ? because this could be the fairest solution

And what is considered to be the time-stamp?

"Suchpool: 7 (time stamp 12:15PM EST)
Suprnova: 95 (time stamp 12:16PM EST)
minerpools: 7 (time stamp 12:17PM EST)"

ARbit

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:49:43 PM

Quote from: seedooroff on May 15, 2015, 12:36:11 PM