[ANN] Armory 0.93.1 Official Release - page 3.

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: unamis76 on March 03, 2015, 06:27:42 AM

Quote from: goatpig on March 02, 2015, 04:58:32 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 03:32:35 PM

It's an online machine, and I used the Armory Installer

No x86 online for 0.93. Go back to 0.92.3 and wait for the next release for x86

Odd, your website lists 0.93 for Ubuntu 12.04+ (32bit), I thought your binaries would be compatible...

I guess I'll just install it on my 64 bit machine

Yeah we forgot to rename all that stuff, sorry about that =(

achow101_alt

sr. member

Activity: 268

Merit: 258

Will Bitcoin Core 0.10 be available through the secure downloader?

unamis76

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Quote from: goatpig on March 02, 2015, 04:58:32 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 03:32:35 PM

It's an online machine, and I used the Armory Installer

No x86 online for 0.93. Go back to 0.92.3 and wait for the next release for x86

Odd, your website lists 0.93 for Ubuntu 12.04+ (32bit), I thought your binaries would be compatible...

I guess I'll just install it on my 64 bit machine

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 03:32:35 PM

It's an online machine, and I used the Armory Installer

No x86 online for 0.93. Go back to 0.92.3 and wait for the next release for x86

unamis76

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Quote from: goatpig on March 02, 2015, 02:40:02 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 12:48:59 PM

Yes, I am

Are you trying to use Armory on this machine as an offline signer or to get online?

It's an online machine, and I used the Armory Installer

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 12:48:59 PM

Yes, I am

Are you trying to use Armory on this machine as an offline signer or to get online?

unamis76

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Quote from: goatpig on March 02, 2015, 12:19:31 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 11:16:42 AM

Tried installing 0.93 on Ubuntu 14.04 and it errored out saying it couldn't install python-gtk2:i386 and Ubuntu Software Center disappeared from my system, along with many apps (VirtualBox, Dropbox, Okular...), what am I missing?

You are using a 32bit OS?

Yes, I am

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: unamis76 on March 02, 2015, 11:16:42 AM

Tried installing 0.93 on Ubuntu 14.04 and it errored out saying it couldn't install python-gtk2:i386 and Ubuntu Software Center disappeared from my system, along with many apps (VirtualBox, Dropbox, Okular...), what am I missing?

You are using a 32bit OS?

unamis76

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Tried installing 0.93 on Ubuntu 14.04 and it errored out saying it couldn't install python-gtk2:i386 and Ubuntu Software Center disappeared from my system, along with many apps (VirtualBox, Dropbox, Okular...), what am I missing?

justusranvier

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1013

Quote from: goatpig on February 27, 2015, 11:21:53 AM

This commit is in dev, and dev is unstable currently.

Oops - somehow my local repo ended up with confusing upstream tracking branches.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

Quote from: goatpig on February 27, 2015, 11:24:48 AM

Quote from: bitpop on February 27, 2015, 11:08:58 AM

I just noticed all the transaction inputs are the same multisig address for all my transactions

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10416464

Thanks I thought everyone magically switched to multisig but wondered why their change wasn't

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: bitpop on February 27, 2015, 11:08:58 AM

I just noticed all the transaction inputs are the same multisig address for all my transactions

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10416464

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: justusranvier on February 27, 2015, 10:28:25 AM

Also your master branch as of 25248a752364afa91b4701f5b28b203ecd8364f2 doesn't build:

This commit is in dev, and dev is unstable currently. I was stopped halfway through a big change to go after the BDM error issue.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

I just noticed all the transaction inputs are the same multisig address for all my transactions

justusranvier

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1013

Also your master branch as of 25248a752364afa91b4701f5b28b203ecd8364f2 doesn't build:

Code:

make -C cppForSwig
make[1]: Entering directory 'redacted/src/BitcoinArmory/cppForSwig'
g++  -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c UniversalTimer.cpp
g++  -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c BinaryData.cpp
g++  -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c lmdb_wrapper.cpp
g++  -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c StoredBlockObj.cpp
g++  -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c BtcUtils.cpp
lmdb_wrapper.cpp: In member function ‘bool LMDBBlockDatabase::getStoredTx_byHash(BinaryDataRef, StoredTx*, BinaryData*) const’:
lmdb_wrapper.cpp:2627:54: error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘BinaryData&’ from an rvalue of type ‘BinaryData’
       BinaryData& gettxhash = getTxHashForLdbKey(hint);
                                                      ^
g++  -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c BlockObj.cpp
Makefile:87: recipe for target 'lmdb_wrapper.o' failed
make[1]: *** [lmdb_wrapper.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: Leaving directory 'redacted/src/BitcoinArmory/cppForSwig'
Makefile:9: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

justusranvier

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1013

Regarding the BDM errors, I've seen them happen a few time now, and the pattern is they occur when starting up Armory after it hasn't been running for ~1 week, with bitcoind running constantly in the background (not under Armory's control).

goatpig

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1364

Armory Developer

Quote from: rszibele on February 27, 2015, 06:17:59 AM

Armory 0.93 does not work for me, I though it was due to Armory being on a fuse NTFS partition on Debian (thread), but even on an ext4 partition it fails to sync and also fails at building the database Undecided

.

Force your bitcoin folder with --satoshi-datadir, the path auto detect is failing somehow.

rszibele

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Armory 0.93 does not work for me, I though it was due to Armory being on a fuse NTFS partition on Debian (thread), but even on an ext4 partition it fails to sync and also fails at building the database Undecided

.

This is the only error that seems relevant:

Code:

2015-02-26 09:46 (ERROR) -- Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/ArmoryQt.py", line 7038, in method_signal
    method()
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/ArmoryQt.py", line 2473, in proceedOnceBitcoindIsReady
    self.loadBlockchainIfNecessary()
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/ArmoryQt.py", line 2525, in loadBlockchainIfNecessary
    TheBDM.goOnline()
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/armoryengine/BDM.py", line 148, in inner
    return func(*newArgs, **kwargs)
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/armoryengine/BDM.py", line 251, in goOnline
    self.bdmThread.setConfig(self.bdmConfig())
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/armoryengine/BDM.py", line 148, in inner
    return func(*newArgs, **kwargs)
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/armoryengine/BDM.py", line 339, in bdmConfig
    bdmConfig.blkFileLocation = blockdir
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/CppBlockUtils.py", line 2067, in 
    __setattr__ = lambda self, name, value: _swig_setattr(self, BlockDataManagerConfig, name, value)
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/CppBlockUtils.py", line 45, in _swig_setattr
    return _swig_setattr_nondynamic(self,class_type,name,value,0)
  File "/media/disk0/Armory/CppBlockUtils.py", line 38, in _swig_setattr_nondynamic
    if method: return method(self,value)
TypeError: in method 'BlockDataManagerConfig_blkFileLocation_set', argument 2 of type 'string const &'

I tried Armory 0.93 with the latest Bitcoin-core and also the previous Bitcoin-core, and it fails to sync and build the database with both of them.

As others have suggested, I will try the old Armory 0.92.3 with the previous Bitcoin-core.

senoirdean

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

BDM Error here also. Rebuilding DB. Im guessing Id have to uninstall Armory to roll it back then import backup? Man this sucks I was really glad to see how much faster Armory started up with new version.

RoadStress

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1007

Quote from: bitpop on February 25, 2015, 02:01:14 AM

I'm glad armory might be getting paid business. Armory #1

Armory has been absolutely solid

I agree with you. I love and support Armory!

Topic: [ANN] Armory 0.93.1 Official Release - page 3. (Read 16724 times)