Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!! - page 434. (Read 946654 times)
March 06, 2014, 03:19:25 PM
The point of getting in to cryptsy is to get hype. They have created a perfect pump and dump scheme with the voting. All coin that were on top get significant boost today.
March 06, 2014, 03:14:59 PM
But wouldn't price on Mintpal (and CT) synch with Cryptsty's anyway? So no point in rushing there
YES! That's exactly what will happen. Most people will try to catch the high and then be disappointed. Happens every time.
March 06, 2014, 03:13:43 PM
I hate these vote buying wars. And I hate that Big Vern hasn't said when he was picking the coins.
Anyway, I wanted to caution everyone about what will probably happen if we do get on Cryptsy.
1. Deposits will take a while, and early orders will fill at a high price. There are numerous threads here about how long Cryptsy takes to complete deposits, and people missing out on the initial run-up (read what happened with VTC). I typically make a couple of small deposits, which go through quickly, so I don't miss out completely.
2. API trades will execute first.
3. Some people will manage to pre-deposit coins. No proof of this, but seems to happen every time, by people getting access through the api to the trading engine/wallet.
4. After the initial spike, there will be a huge crash. Be ready for it - it's not necessarily bad, if you are ready to trade to better your position.
5. The price then will slowly move back up to an equilibrium level.
Anyway, I wanted to caution everyone about what will probably happen if we do get on Cryptsy.
1. Deposits will take a while, and early orders will fill at a high price. There are numerous threads here about how long Cryptsy takes to complete deposits, and people missing out on the initial run-up (read what happened with VTC). I typically make a couple of small deposits, which go through quickly, so I don't miss out completely.
2. API trades will execute first.
3. Some people will manage to pre-deposit coins. No proof of this, but seems to happen every time, by people getting access through the api to the trading engine/wallet.
4. After the initial spike, there will be a huge crash. Be ready for it - it's not necessarily bad, if you are ready to trade to better your position.
5. The price then will slowly move back up to an equilibrium level.
But wouldn't price on Mintpal (and CT) synch with Cryptsty's anyway? So no point in rushing there
March 06, 2014, 03:12:43 PM
Just seen on twitter:
"@Ezra_Von_Braun @cryptsy not automatically top two. Votes key but other factors like quality of devs and diversity of support also matter"
"@Ezra_Von_Braun @cryptsy not automatically top two. Votes key but other factors like quality of devs and diversity of support also matter"
March 06, 2014, 03:10:59 PM
P.S. UTClover: I have some of youre coins in my wallet.
DCgirl: Good job! Done me Prowd! lol
For a minute there I thought you said you had some of MY coins in your wallet.
but thanks for the thumbs-up!
March 06, 2014, 03:10:45 PM
takei is gonna take nr1
why you think so Bumface, please explain click the btc adres,1 vote is 0.0002 btc, they have 10500 votes coming
Serious action needed now;
1: we accept we probably get the Bronze price and tomorrow Maza and Takei coin run a way whit Gold and Silver and getting ad at Cryptsy by BigVern
2: we wait for next change to being add (can be next week but also after more weeks with the risk we have to fight again to other coins)
3: we don’t accept this, we will fight back STRONG and everybody who can will donate (small or big) for buying votes (DEV team/Miners/Holders/Believers/Supporters)
One big vote from pooled resource or many small donations?
KC
March 06, 2014, 03:06:22 PM
takei is gonna take nr1
why you think so Bumface, please explain click the btc adres,1 vote is 0.0002 btc, they have 10500 votes coming
Serious action needed now;
1: we accept we probably get the Bronze price and tomorrow Maza and Takei coin run a way whit Gold and Silver and getting ad at Cryptsy by BigVern
2: we wait for next change to being add (can be next week but also after more weeks with the risk we have to fight again to other new coins)
3: we don’t accept this, we will fight back STRONG and everybody who can and who want will donate (small or big) for buying votes (DEV team/Miners/Holders/Believers/Supporters)
March 06, 2014, 03:05:36 PM
I hate these vote buying wars. And I hate that Big Vern hasn't said when he was picking the coins.
Anyway, I wanted to caution everyone about what will probably happen if we do get on Cryptsy.
1. Deposits will take a while, and early orders will fill at a high price. There are numerous threads here about how long Cryptsy takes to complete deposits, and people missing out on the initial run-up (read what happened with VTC). I typically make a couple of small deposits, which go through quickly, so I don't miss out completely.
2. API trades will execute first.
3. Some people will manage to pre-deposit coins. No proof of this, but seems to happen every time, by people getting access through the api to the trading engine/wallet.
4. After the initial spike, there will be a huge crash. Be ready for it - it's not necessarily bad, if you are ready to trade to better your position.
5. The price then will slowly move back up to an equilibrium level.
Anyway, I wanted to caution everyone about what will probably happen if we do get on Cryptsy.
1. Deposits will take a while, and early orders will fill at a high price. There are numerous threads here about how long Cryptsy takes to complete deposits, and people missing out on the initial run-up (read what happened with VTC). I typically make a couple of small deposits, which go through quickly, so I don't miss out completely.
2. API trades will execute first.
3. Some people will manage to pre-deposit coins. No proof of this, but seems to happen every time, by people getting access through the api to the trading engine/wallet.
4. After the initial spike, there will be a huge crash. Be ready for it - it's not necessarily bad, if you are ready to trade to better your position.
5. The price then will slowly move back up to an equilibrium level.
March 06, 2014, 03:03:35 PM
.1 voting on its way
March 06, 2014, 03:01:09 PM
I added a Facebook post and dumped some promotional credit into it to boost exposure: https://www.facebook.com/ultracoinnet
I also dropped some BTC into the vote. Only .03, for now. Any little bit will help if you have it guys!
I also dropped some BTC into the vote. Only .03, for now. Any little bit will help if you have it guys!
March 06, 2014, 02:59:47 PM
FYI those 700MH/s on Nitro equals around 3,5GH/s in Scrypt for those who want to compare.
March 06, 2014, 02:57:09 PM
hope that the devs dont dump all there coins on cryptsy.. tormow the coin will be on there .. DO not DUMP instantly plz
getting on is not a certainty at this point, and my selling goal is 10 dollar
if he really wanted he coulda dumped at 0015 on CT a month ago
March 06, 2014, 02:55:55 PM
hope that the devs dont dump all there coins on cryptsy.. tormow the coin will be on there .. DO not DUMP instantly plz
getting on is not a certainty at this point, and my selling goal is 10 dollar
March 06, 2014, 02:54:28 PM
takecoin just passed us
March 06, 2014, 02:53:47 PM
hope that the devs dont dump all there coins on cryptsy.. tormow the coin will be on there .. DO not DUMP instantly plz
March 06, 2014, 02:52:55 PM
Hi I could do with some help optimising my CGMiner. I am running 2 sapphire Dual X r9 280x's. Currently I am running with:
cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://ultra.leetpools.com:3335 -u x -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -d 0,1 -g 2 -s 1 -E 10 -v 1 -I 11,11 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192 --gpu-fan 100,30-75 --temp-cutoff 90,90 --temp-overheat 85,85 --temp-target 72,72 --gpu-powertune -20,-20 --gpu-engine 1120,1120 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500 --worksize 256 --expiry 1 --queue 0 --scan-time 1
Any and all advice is much appreciated. I would like to get back up to I 12.
cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://ultra.leetpools.com:3335 -u x -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -d 0,1 -g 2 -s 1 -E 10 -v 1 -I 11,11 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192 --gpu-fan 100,30-75 --temp-cutoff 90,90 --temp-overheat 85,85 --temp-target 72,72 --gpu-powertune -20,-20 --gpu-engine 1120,1120 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500 --worksize 256 --expiry 1 --queue 0 --scan-time 1
Any and all advice is much appreciated. I would like to get back up to I 12.
140kh/s on r9 280x Sapphire Dual-X:
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "UTC Nitro",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337",
"user" : "x.x",
"pass" : "x"
},
{
"name" : "UTC Leet",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://ultra.leetpools.com:3333",
"user" : "x.x",
"pass" : "x"
}
],
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"kernel" : "scrypt-jane",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scrypt-jane" : true,
"sj-nfmin" : "4",
"sj-nfmax" : "30",
"sj-time" : "1388361600",
"shares" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-fan" : "90",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "1050,1050",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500,1500",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"scan-time" : "30",
"intensity" : "12",
"temp-target" : "88",
"temp-overheat" : "90",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "512",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"shaders" : "2048",
"thread-concurrency" : "16384"
}
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "UTC Nitro",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337",
"user" : "x.x",
"pass" : "x"
},
{
"name" : "UTC Leet",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://ultra.leetpools.com:3333",
"user" : "x.x",
"pass" : "x"
}
],
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"kernel" : "scrypt-jane",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scrypt-jane" : true,
"sj-nfmin" : "4",
"sj-nfmax" : "30",
"sj-time" : "1388361600",
"shares" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-fan" : "90",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "1050,1050",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500,1500",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"scan-time" : "30",
"intensity" : "12",
"temp-target" : "88",
"temp-overheat" : "90",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "512",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"shaders" : "2048",
"thread-concurrency" : "16384"
}
UTC Donations are always welcome :-): UisFWeEn7v6fxBaSmticGdeA6LY7SxdJSV
March 06, 2014, 02:51:56 PM
Well I had some DOGE I mined overnight, just bought into some TAK on MintPal at 520, now at 675. If I make any profit I use it to buy more votes
KC
KC
March 06, 2014, 02:50:06 PM
Make a post on FB saying we need votes - so its seen by everyone that liked the page.
Tweet saying we need votes.
Change tomorrow's giveaway to double the amount if we get on Cryptsy tomorrow, to urge people to vote.
On it!Tweet saying we need votes.
Change tomorrow's giveaway to double the amount if we get on Cryptsy tomorrow, to urge people to vote.
You can use my little banner if you like,
here's the source:
http://i7.minus.com/ibi6aEUaYedNO9.PNG
March 06, 2014, 02:49:55 PM
Hi I could do with some help optimising my CGMiner. I am running 2 sapphire Dual X r9 280x's. Currently I am running with:
cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://ultra.leetpools.com:3335 -u x -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -d 0,1 -g 2 -s 1 -E 10 -v 1 -I 11,11 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192 --gpu-fan 100,30-75 --temp-cutoff 90,90 --temp-overheat 85,85 --temp-target 72,72 --gpu-powertune -20,-20 --gpu-engine 1120,1120 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500 --worksize 256 --expiry 1 --queue 0 --scan-time 1
Any and all advice is much appreciated. I would like to get back up to I 12.
cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://ultra.leetpools.com:3335 -u x -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -d 0,1 -g 2 -s 1 -E 10 -v 1 -I 11,11 --thread-concurrency 8192,8192 --gpu-fan 100,30-75 --temp-cutoff 90,90 --temp-overheat 85,85 --temp-target 72,72 --gpu-powertune -20,-20 --gpu-engine 1120,1120 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500 --worksize 256 --expiry 1 --queue 0 --scan-time 1
Any and all advice is much appreciated. I would like to get back up to I 12.
March 06, 2014, 02:49:09 PM
Jump to: