[ANN] BitcoinT [BT] | X11 | Lucky Stake | POS | BitTrex - page 16.

placebo

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: B-MoneyXcan on April 27, 2015, 04:18:10 PM

Quote from: ghostlander on April 27, 2015, 03:56:53 PM

The super stake code has been activated in 2 days after the genesis block time stamp. That's the 25th of April 2015 15:00 GMT. It has been supposed to remain active for 30 more days, but the dumping has started after these super blocks matured (1440 confirmations; approx. 1 day). So, here you have the drama. If you want to finish with it, remove the super stake code and roll back the block chain to the aforementioned point. This cure isn't much better than the disease, but I don't think anyone is going to fix this wreck of a coin otherwise.

Rolling back to block 2829 sounds like the best solution although many will lose coins.
That would leave about 20,842,500 coins in circulation.
Add a POS rate of 3% per year

How do you know which coins are after block 2829. Coins were traded on exchanges...

B-MoneyXcan

hero member

Activity: 633

Merit: 500

B Money Prepaid Mastercard bmoney.io

Quote from: ghostlander on April 27, 2015, 03:56:53 PM

The super stake code has been activated in 2 days after the genesis block time stamp. That's the 25th of April 2015 15:00 GMT. It has been supposed to remain active for 30 more days, but the dumping has started after these super blocks matured (1440 confirmations; approx. 1 day). So, here you have the drama. If you want to finish with it, remove the super stake code and roll back the block chain to the aforementioned point. This cure isn't much better than the disease, but I don't think anyone is going to fix this wreck of a coin otherwise.

Rolling back to block 2829 sounds like the best solution although many will lose coins.
That would leave about 20,842,500 coins in circulation.
Add a POS rate of 3% per year

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

The Crypto world must see this as a precedent! This arbitrariness must end the only way we all win for a long time!

end look to the BTC he is break the upward trend now

placebo

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Mario241077 on April 27, 2015, 04:13:57 PM

And then how many coins are circulating Huh

Easy fix.

1. ANN WILL BE MADE THAT EVERYBODY HAS TO DEPOSIT THEIR COINS ON C-CEX IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS. ALL COINS NOT DEPOSIT ON C-CEX WILL BE WORTHLESS!!!!

So then C-CEX report me how many coins there are in their wallet. I inform DEV, he makes the premine, sent it to C-CEX and we are back up and running. Maybe there are 30M coins but if only 22M coins hit C-CEX then only 22M coins will be premine and that is it.

2. Will ask C-CEX for a donation address, so that everybody can sent their donations there.

So lets do this....

AGREED? Type AGREED

DISAGREED? Type DISAGREED

We need to act soon, as how longer we wait how more possible big blocks are created.

placebo

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: 5trade on April 27, 2015, 12:45:11 PM

Quote from: Diggio on April 27, 2015, 12:37:22 PM

Quote from: Battareus on April 27, 2015, 09:05:21 AM

Quote from: placebo on April 27, 2015, 08:54:04 AM

Quote from: BTCarchitect on April 27, 2015, 08:49:09 AM

Quote from: willzminame on April 27, 2015, 08:07:05 AM

Quote from: placebo on April 27, 2015, 08:01:20 AM

Latest list:

Quote from: MaGNeT on April 27, 2015, 02:19:01 AM

BitcoinT take-over crowdfund starts here!

Users who quote this commit themselves to fund X coins to the developer(s) who fixes this coin.

If BitcoinT is fixed and still "up-and-running" (including a Github) 7 days after the fix, the payment(s) will be made directly to a BT address provided by the take-over developer(s), within 48 hours.

Funders:
MaGNeT: 250,000 BT
Placebo : 100,000 BT
vgo : 55,000 BT
mrz123 : 250,000 BT
Fielding: 200,000 BT
Digital_Currency_LTD: 5,000 BT
GetGuap$ : 1,000 BT
ACICHEAD: 50,000 BT
ozkraut: 500 BT
david1365: 2,000 BT
Klaasje: 10,000 BT
utclover: 100,000 BT
efelerinefendisi: 25,000 BT
flip21: 50,000BT
ObscureBean: 650 BT
Real789 : 2,000 BT
willzminame : 5,000 BT
BTCarchitect : 500,000 BTC
Battareus : 1.69 BetcoinT
Diggio: 200,000 BT

Quote, add yourself to this list and put in the amount you want to fund!

DEV SUGGESTIONS:

Put your name here above

Donating 500k BT

Are you sure 500,000 BT??? That is a lot Cheesy

. This is already more then 1,600,000 BT coins!!!! Close to 10%!!! OK 6% now Cheesy

I want to donate and help, but wallet not syncing and what about funds on exchanges?

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

And then??? how many coins are circulating Huh

placebo

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: trunks on April 27, 2015, 07:45:35 AM

Quote from: placebo on April 27, 2015, 07:36:53 AM

Quote from: Litecoinkid on April 27, 2015, 07:35:06 AM

Crypto already has some really great up and coming coins and devs,not sure why people are not investing more in them,instead off all the daily scam coins(not saying this is a scam)thats for all you to decide,are we all looking for the next crave? Cheesy

good luck and hope you guys have not lost to much Wink

you win some you lose some thats crypto

In fact, i was planning to contact CRAVE and TRON devs. They can use the same masternode on BT, and if we can give them a 10% bounty, then why should they not do it, it can be a easy $5k for them...

bitcoint might still have hidden premine. no one knows how the developer got the hidden premine. maybe he can constantly print new coins with this source.
so it is better to make a new coin and pay bittrex to do a coin swap.

look, how about i create you a coin with masternodes and anon tech
and you pay bittrex bitcoins to do a coin swap. that bt holders deposit their coins in bittrex, and bittrex gives everyone from the new coin. except the developer that scammed us, if he deposit they just not credit him. or somthing like that.
and you take over the new coin, since you are the roscoin developer.
sounds good?

(i won't accept payment for this if i do it. since i won't take over the coin. if you want to take over it then you get the fund everyone is making. idk)

We can have masternodes included... if truncks is working with us.

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 04:02:28 PM

Quote from: getrichdietryin on April 27, 2015, 03:51:57 PM

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 03:42:19 PM

Quote from: richiela on April 27, 2015, 12:48:16 PM

All,

It's been almost 24 hours since the flaw was discovered. As i originally stated, if the dev team could not come up with an agreeable solution, we would remove the market. At this time, we have not heard from the dev team and can only assume malicious intent. Given that, we have removed the market and will be re-opening the wallet for withdrawals only. Good luck with the community takeover, we will revisit if the coin stabilizes.

A couple of data points that need to be clarified:

* I do not believe a large dump occurred. There was a deposit for 4.1M coins into a new account (which previously dumped 100k and withdrew all the BTC) but these were never credited because of security alarms.
* Until someone does a full analysis of the blockchain, it is impossible to say how many coins were generated incorrectly.
* There was not a hidden premine, or other exploit that has been seen before. As far as we can tell, the bug/exploit was located in the complicated lucky staking code.

thanks,
richie

And again they did not make the right decision! It's not the first time they made the wrong dicision to put a coin on their exchange! Way too fast and they are accountable for a lot of money loss. Sorry for your loss guys!

i dont see how you can blame bittrex. other two exchanges added it before. no exchange is to blame. exchanges cannot advise what is good or bad. they add coins if there is demand. demand is created by investors. if investors buy in blindly how is exchange to be blamed. any coin dev can leave a coin and not be held responsible. even crave dev can go. its crypto and risks will be taken. all you can do is look after yourself. you can pay for code to be checked.

i do agree all exchanges should look through code before adding. but no exchange adds a coin whether its good or bad. its added on demand

As i said, way to fast. They think about fast fees. Watch Poloniex. If i trade on bittrex they are accountable for bringing quality shares to their exchange. Do the work before you decide as a respectable exchange should do!!

I'm with you! Fee can not be anything!
Rather, the eyes on a continuous development should be!

B-MoneyXcan

hero member

Activity: 633

Merit: 500

B Money Prepaid Mastercard bmoney.io

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 04:02:28 PM

Quote from: getrichdietryin on April 27, 2015, 03:51:57 PM

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 03:42:19 PM

Quote from: richiela on April 27, 2015, 12:48:16 PM

All,

It's been almost 24 hours since the flaw was discovered. As i originally stated, if the dev team could not come up with an agreeable solution, we would remove the market. At this time, we have not heard from the dev team and can only assume malicious intent. Given that, we have removed the market and will be re-opening the wallet for withdrawals only. Good luck with the community takeover, we will revisit if the coin stabilizes.

A couple of data points that need to be clarified:

* I do not believe a large dump occurred. There was a deposit for 4.1M coins into a new account (which previously dumped 100k and withdrew all the BTC) but these were never credited because of security alarms.
* Until someone does a full analysis of the blockchain, it is impossible to say how many coins were generated incorrectly.
* There was not a hidden premine, or other exploit that has been seen before. As far as we can tell, the bug/exploit was located in the complicated lucky staking code.

thanks,
richie

And again they did not make the right decision! It's not the first time they made the wrong dicision to put a coin on their exchange! Way too fast and they are accountable for a lot of money loss. Sorry for your loss guys!

i dont see how you can blame bittrex. other two exchanges added it before. no exchange is to blame. exchanges cannot advise what is good or bad. they add coins if there is demand. demand is created by investors. if investors buy in blindly how is exchange to be blamed. any coin dev can leave a coin and not be held responsible. even crave dev can go. its crypto and risks will be taken. all you can do is look after yourself. you can pay for code to be checked.

i do agree all exchanges should look through code before adding. but no exchange adds a coin whether its good or bad. its added on demand

As i said, way to fast. They think about fast fees. Watch Poloniex. If i trade on bittrex they are accountable for bringing quality shares to their exchange. Do the work before you decide as a respectable exchange should do!!

Reason why Poloniex is the best!

STEALTHMODE

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks

Quote from: getrichdietryin on April 27, 2015, 03:51:57 PM

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 03:42:19 PM

Quote from: richiela on April 27, 2015, 12:48:16 PM

All,

It's been almost 24 hours since the flaw was discovered. As i originally stated, if the dev team could not come up with an agreeable solution, we would remove the market. At this time, we have not heard from the dev team and can only assume malicious intent. Given that, we have removed the market and will be re-opening the wallet for withdrawals only. Good luck with the community takeover, we will revisit if the coin stabilizes.

A couple of data points that need to be clarified:

* I do not believe a large dump occurred. There was a deposit for 4.1M coins into a new account (which previously dumped 100k and withdrew all the BTC) but these were never credited because of security alarms.
* Until someone does a full analysis of the blockchain, it is impossible to say how many coins were generated incorrectly.
* There was not a hidden premine, or other exploit that has been seen before. As far as we can tell, the bug/exploit was located in the complicated lucky staking code.

thanks,
richie

And again they did not make the right decision! It's not the first time they made the wrong dicision to put a coin on their exchange! Way too fast and they are accountable for a lot of money loss. Sorry for your loss guys!

i dont see how you can blame bittrex. other two exchanges added it before. no exchange is to blame. exchanges cannot advise what is good or bad. they add coins if there is demand. demand is created by investors. if investors buy in blindly how is exchange to be blamed. any coin dev can leave a coin and not be held responsible. even crave dev can go. its crypto and risks will be taken. all you can do is look after yourself. you can pay for code to be checked.

i do agree all exchanges should look through code before adding. but no exchange adds a coin whether its good or bad. its added on demand

As i said, way to fast. They think about fast fees. Watch Poloniex. If i trade on bittrex they are accountable for bringing quality shares to their exchange. Do the work before you decide as a respectable exchange should do!!

tech999

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 10

Contribute my Staking! Grin

bPU7dtVYaVZm7WQ99uu8gPpnwDSJy8DjRS

CryptoClub

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1000

cryptocollectorsclub.com

Even with a low marketcap, looks like around 10k USD in donations, might be worth some devs time. If is is more successful than the Asiacoin save, then could be 20k USD or more already gathered up to donate. I can do some free promotions for the save, if it happens, and if not, all I can say, not buying any "new coins" for a good amount of time. I will wait a few months and make sure none of this bullshit pops up.

B-MoneyXcan

hero member

Activity: 633

Merit: 500

B Money Prepaid Mastercard bmoney.io

I think its fair to say that Bittrex does not thoroughly investigate coins and devs before adding. This is amateur. Like C-Cex and Yobit.
Adding on hype is just as bad as buying on hype Cool

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

my favorite developer

honest and clear answer, sometimes very hard in his words. But correct! haha in memory of the last 24 hours!

ghostlander

legendary

Activity: 1242

Merit: 1020

No surrender, no retreat, no regret.

The super stake code has been activated in 2 days after the genesis block time stamp. That's the 25th of April 2015 15:00 GMT. It has been supposed to remain active for 30 more days, but the dumping has started after these super blocks matured (1440 confirmations; approx. 1 day). So, here you have the drama. If you want to finish with it, remove the super stake code and roll back the block chain to the aforementioned point. This cure isn't much better than the disease, but I don't think anyone is going to fix this wreck of a coin otherwise.

getrichdietryin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitrev on April 27, 2015, 03:52:25 PM

Quote from: placebo on April 27, 2015, 03:27:41 PM

Lets take some action here:

Someone that i know can make a new X11 type of coin. Just a standard stable coin with X number of coins as premine to do the swap. I would suggest that a part of the donation will go to the person that create the coin, then we need a team, per team member we have to allocate a amount of coins so that they keep on working for the coin and are in for the long run.

I'm not interested at all to be part of the team as i'm too busy with my own project but i believe there were a few. So please, speak out if you agree to create a new coin, do a swap on C-CEX and have a promotion team ready to promote the coin.

I like it, I'm. Perhaps good to show some transaction of purchase. This way our friend the scam artist won't be able to swap the premine.

unless you have a plan for good features and loyal i wouldnt even bother take the loss move on. seems like you just want it to be alive by force

bitrev

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 250

Quote from: placebo on April 27, 2015, 03:27:41 PM

Lets take some action here:

Someone that i know can make a new X11 type of coin. Just a standard stable coin with X number of coins as premine to do the swap. I would suggest that a part of the donation will go to the person that create the coin, then we need a team, per team member we have to allocate a amount of coins so that they keep on working for the coin and are in for the long run.

I'm not interested at all to be part of the team as i'm too busy with my own project but i believe there were a few. So please, speak out if you agree to create a new coin, do a swap on C-CEX and have a promotion team ready to promote the coin.

I like it, I'm. Perhaps good to show some transaction of purchase. This way our friend the scam artist won't be able to swap the premine.

getrichdietryin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 03:42:19 PM

Quote from: richiela on April 27, 2015, 12:48:16 PM

All,

It's been almost 24 hours since the flaw was discovered. As i originally stated, if the dev team could not come up with an agreeable solution, we would remove the market. At this time, we have not heard from the dev team and can only assume malicious intent. Given that, we have removed the market and will be re-opening the wallet for withdrawals only. Good luck with the community takeover, we will revisit if the coin stabilizes.

A couple of data points that need to be clarified:

* I do not believe a large dump occurred. There was a deposit for 4.1M coins into a new account (which previously dumped 100k and withdrew all the BTC) but these were never credited because of security alarms.
* Until someone does a full analysis of the blockchain, it is impossible to say how many coins were generated incorrectly.
* There was not a hidden premine, or other exploit that has been seen before. As far as we can tell, the bug/exploit was located in the complicated lucky staking code.

thanks,
richie

And again they did not make the right decision! It's not the first time they made the wrong dicision to put a coin on their exchange! Way too fast and they are accountable for a lot of money loss. Sorry for your loss guys!

i dont see how you can blame bittrex. other two exchanges added it before. no exchange is to blame. exchanges cannot advise what is good or bad. they add coins if there is demand. demand is created by investors. if investors buy in blindly how is exchange to be blamed. any coin dev can leave a coin and not be held responsible. even crave dev can go. its crypto and risks will be taken. all you can do is look after yourself. you can pay for code to be checked.

i do agree all exchanges should look through code before adding. but no exchange adds a coin whether its good or bad. its added on demand

Mario241077

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1000

ORB has a good chance to grow.

Quote from: B-MoneyXcan on April 27, 2015, 03:49:26 PM

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 03:42:19 PM

Quote from: richiela on April 27, 2015, 12:48:16 PM

All,

It's been almost 24 hours since the flaw was discovered. As i originally stated, if the dev team could not come up with an agreeable solution, we would remove the market. At this time, we have not heard from the dev team and can only assume malicious intent. Given that, we have removed the market and will be re-opening the wallet for withdrawals only. Good luck with the community takeover, we will revisit if the coin stabilizes.

A couple of data points that need to be clarified:

* I do not believe a large dump occurred. There was a deposit for 4.1M coins into a new account (which previously dumped 100k and withdrew all the BTC) but these were never credited because of security alarms.
* Until someone does a full analysis of the blockchain, it is impossible to say how many coins were generated incorrectly.
* There was not a hidden premine, or other exploit that has been seen before. As far as we can tell, the bug/exploit was located in the complicated lucky staking code.

thanks,
richie

And again they did not make the right decision! It's not the first time they made the wrong dicision to put a coin on their exchange! Way too fast and they are accountable for a lot of money loss. Sorry for your loss guys!

Totally agree with you. Aside from the bad decision, they keep the fees generated from the trades and come out ahead compared to the traders.

right away, keep it up!

B-MoneyXcan

hero member

Activity: 633

Merit: 500

B Money Prepaid Mastercard bmoney.io

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on April 27, 2015, 03:42:19 PM

Quote from: richiela on April 27, 2015, 12:48:16 PM

All,

It's been almost 24 hours since the flaw was discovered. As i originally stated, if the dev team could not come up with an agreeable solution, we would remove the market. At this time, we have not heard from the dev team and can only assume malicious intent. Given that, we have removed the market and will be re-opening the wallet for withdrawals only. Good luck with the community takeover, we will revisit if the coin stabilizes.

A couple of data points that need to be clarified:

* I do not believe a large dump occurred. There was a deposit for 4.1M coins into a new account (which previously dumped 100k and withdrew all the BTC) but these were never credited because of security alarms.
* Until someone does a full analysis of the blockchain, it is impossible to say how many coins were generated incorrectly.
* There was not a hidden premine, or other exploit that has been seen before. As far as we can tell, the bug/exploit was located in the complicated lucky staking code.

thanks,
richie

And again they did not make the right decision! It's not the first time they made the wrong dicision to put a coin on their exchange! Way too fast and they are accountable for a lot of money loss. Sorry for your loss guys!

Totally agree with you. Aside from the bad decision, they keep the fees generated from the trades and come out ahead compared to the traders.

Topic: [ANN] BitcoinT [BT] | X11 | Lucky Stake | POS | BitTrex - page 16. (Read 74413 times)