The version I think we are using has some branding ambiguity. This may seem like a small thing, but for value having a consistent brand is very important. I say stay with the Bitcoin orange whatever we do, and the wallet does look better than the boring BTC clone wallet previously, it just needs some tweaks. If I have wallet improvements that makes for nice easy visuals to share, combined hopefully with lucky blocks being found, that would be extremely helpful for me so I can help out too. (sharing positive news)
Obviously working lucky blocks are key.
Lastly, if the dev could stop in and say "hi," that would help. We did donate a fair amount and the value can be built up, but we have to start with the basics if we want this to be high volume and satoshi value. I think all we need for the 30 days is the working lucky blocks, nice consistent branding with the wallet, and the Dev identifying their anon identity at least. Then we can worry about building it up on not past that once the basics are covered.
I'm not sure the developer wants to pick up the coin long term. He agreed to fix the wallet and get it going again so we may need to recruit one or more. I've been reviewing the code but I'm not sure I want to take on the project either. Taking care of the visual updates wouldn't take much.
For awareness; the lucky block code defines greater than 50K, greater than or equal to 100K, and greater than or equal to 300K so anyone with addresses of exactly 50K will not qualify for the 5k lucky block rewards. Based on the main topic, the first level should have been greater than or EQUAL to 50K so make sure you have a transaction of a little more than 50K to qualify.
also i will be pretty worried when in the next 24 hours they are no lucky blocks 