Wallet stuck at 366 blocks. Anyone else seeing this? Conf looks like this:
rpcuser=rpcuser
rpcpassword=rpcpassword
rpcport=27270
port=28184
addnode=107.170.57.24
addnode=178.62.235.171
Any other nodes I should have?
Topic: [ANN] BitcoinT [BTX] | X11 | LUCKY BLOCKS - C-CEX - PM TEAM SETUP. - page 6. (Read 39785 times)
May 04, 2015, 08:12:34 PM
May 04, 2015, 06:57:59 PM
It looks like someone is trying to buy all existing BTX at C-Cex?
12.5 BTC buywall
Do the whales get back in again?
May 04, 2015, 06:35:32 PM
It looks like someone is trying to buy all existing BTX at C-Cex?
May 04, 2015, 05:57:00 PM
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
It is! Congratulations!
Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be.
Of course it is. http://107.170.57.24/tx/f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
55k on input, 60k on output = 5000 WOCX bonus
Yes, it's missing few BTX because POS reward is added little bit differently then one would expect, but that's not really a problem.
Here is the proof
May 04, 2015, 05:21:29 PM
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
It is! Congratulations!
Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be.
It can be but the fees would have to be higher than the subsidy to reduce the 5000 reward to less than that. It calculates the subsidy, adds the lucky block amount if you draw a number less than 3 (5000 in this case), and then returns the subsidy plus the fees. If the fees passed in were higher than your subsidy before the lucky block was added, your overall reward will get reduced.
Probably makes more sense to simply return the reward (exact amount) if you hit one.
Yes, it's lower because fees are accounted incorrectly, but it's minor problem and probably not worth fixing (it would require hard-fork)
May 04, 2015, 05:09:54 PM
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
It is! Congratulations!
Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be.
It can be but the fees would have to be higher than the subsidy to reduce the 5000 reward to less than that. It calculates the subsidy, adds the lucky block amount if you draw a number less than 3 (5000 in this case), and then returns the subsidy plus the fees. If the fees passed in were higher than your subsidy before the lucky block was added, your overall reward will get reduced.
Probably makes more sense to simply return the reward (exact amount) if you hit one.
May 04, 2015, 05:09:18 PM
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
It is! Congratulations!
Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be.
Of course it is. http://107.170.57.24/tx/f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
55k on input, 60k on output = 5000 WOCX bonus
Yes, it's missing few BTX because POS reward is added little bit differently then one would expect, but that's not really a problem.
May 04, 2015, 04:58:20 PM
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd
It is! Congratulations!
Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be.
May 04, 2015, 04:56:54 PM
Not bad indeed
May 04, 2015, 04:50:30 PM
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo,
I just reviewed the old code with the new code...
I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some)
If you have access to code, could you please send it to me?
1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png
2- http://i.imgur.com/WePEbxl.png
It looks really good!
May 04, 2015, 04:11:42 PM
Thank you all for your kind words. I'm just trying to do my part
May 04, 2015, 03:55:08 PM
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo,
I just reviewed the old code with the new code...
I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some)
If you have access to code, could you please send it to me?
1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png
2-
Wow, that's awesome!
May 04, 2015, 03:48:44 PM
Like it too. Restores the orange and removes the text behind the other areas to make it them easier to read. Will expand better as well.
May 04, 2015, 03:41:29 PM
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo,
I just reviewed the old code with the new code...
I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some)
If you have access to code, could you please send it to me?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png?dl=0
NICE!! looks great so far
May 04, 2015, 03:36:18 PM
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo,
I just reviewed the old code with the new code...
I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some)
If you have access to code, could you please send it to me?
1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png
2-
May 04, 2015, 03:29:58 PM
And I was happy for have bough around 0.3 between 130 and 170, and now it touched 42!
Hope to see the rise soon to 1k at least.
Hope to see the rise soon to 1k at least.
Patient... you never know what can happen.
May 04, 2015, 03:24:22 PM
And I was happy for have bough around 0.3 between 130 and 170, and now it touched 42!
Hope to see the rise soon to 1k at least.
Hope to see the rise soon to 1k at least.
May 04, 2015, 03:07:41 PM
I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some)
If you have access to code, could you please send it to me?
BTXdev,
Here are the files I have (open links in a new window):
bitcoint-master.zip
bitcoint-qt.zip
graphics.zip
BitcoinT.zip
Appreciate your help with this.
May 04, 2015, 02:45:23 PM
Based on the old topic, Lucky Blocks was never meant to be a long term strategy with the original coin. It was meant for the first 30 days or at a certain block.
If you've read the two threads, I've suggested a couple of times the lucky block amounts could be reduced and the number increased to give more people a chance to earn one while still reducing coin inflation. More winners at lower numbers is better than 3 at 15K and 1 at 60K.
I didn't look hard enough to see if the cutoff date/block is still there. Is this going to be the new long-term algorithm and it's not restricted to 30 days? I think everyone here should know what has changed. Believe the algorithm was meant to produce 24 at 5K, 3 at 15K and 1 at 60K per day (or close to it) for the first 30 days. If we want to reduce it, that's fine but 2 at 5K since we started back up is pretty low if limited to 30 days.
@ BTXdev; there was a link to the old code in this thread or the previous thread--I would have to go looking for it. I do have an original copy burned to a DVD if needed but I pulled that off of that link. I'll see if I can find it.
If you've read the two threads, I've suggested a couple of times the lucky block amounts could be reduced and the number increased to give more people a chance to earn one while still reducing coin inflation. More winners at lower numbers is better than 3 at 15K and 1 at 60K.
I didn't look hard enough to see if the cutoff date/block is still there. Is this going to be the new long-term algorithm and it's not restricted to 30 days? I think everyone here should know what has changed. Believe the algorithm was meant to produce 24 at 5K, 3 at 15K and 1 at 60K per day (or close to it) for the first 30 days. If we want to reduce it, that's fine but 2 at 5K since we started back up is pretty low if limited to 30 days.
@ BTXdev; there was a link to the old code in this thread or the previous thread--I would have to go looking for it. I do have an original copy burned to a DVD if needed but I pulled that off of that link. I'll see if I can find it.
MaGNeT posted them originally (see post 94); links don't appear to be working any longer. Will have to upload somewhere.
May 04, 2015, 02:37:30 PM
i'm still holding my coin lol
Jump to: