Topic: [ANN] BitMovio - GAMIFIED VIDEO ENTERTAINMENT PLATFORM - page 2. (Read 806 times)

Thank you for the link you provided. But after I read through the link I did not find something I was looking for. I want to know more information about your token (MoviBits). I didn't find the question I asked, I hope you can provide the answer. And I also want to know about your strategy in increasing the value of your tokens after being hit by the bearish season and enough to drop the price of your tokens.

You can learn about the competitive edge here: https://steemit.com/blockchain/@hatu/7qwnrp-new-content-platform-ex-netflix-and-amazon-video-team-turns-to-decentralization

Great concept with awesome features, I appreciate the birth of this project, but there is something I want to ask, about what you can provide to make you different from a project similar to this? And do you not have a Private Sale, ICO or IEO stage for your token (MoviBits) or Is that only obtained from earnings on your platform?

Interesting. Working product on announcement is pretty rare to see in such projects.

---

I'm having problems uploading video though, it takes ages and is not getting uploaded.

Had he/she been driven by curiosity and presented a question, I would have responded very differently.

Instead, this person was driven by a false sense of pride over an accusation that is (ironically) completely wrong and just shows his/her lack of basic understandings, including the inability to separate a Legal Disclaimer from actual whitepaper content. Baseless, inflammatory false accusations deserve the kind of response I gave.

I think I am with you here. Legal disclaimer section is almost similar to most projects.
Sometimes they just change the name of a specific project.
There's nothing wrong in that part.
It will be upsetting if the body of your wp is highly plagiarized.
I guess he feels that your approach to him is not so diplomatic, the reason why he's also upset?
But anyway, we all have different personalities. I guess respect is all we need and be logical with reasoning.

I'm not giving you an excuse for your idiocy. I'm straight-up calling you a moron for not knowing that a "legal disclaimer" is created by lawyers, not project teams.

I've tried explaining that to you twice but you're a combination of egotistic stupidity and ignorance and therefore won't admit that you are wrong. And this is the last time I will respond to you. And I'll also clarify one last time: the project's whitepaper, created by the team, starts at page 5; all information prior to that is a legal disclaimer created by lawyers.

If you find any plagiarism in the TEAM'S CONTENT, please point it out as otherwise you have no case beside being too stupid to recognize what a legal disclaimer is.

Always give everyone such excuse when they got caught with fake content. This is nothing new.
Do you know when to use bad language? When caught with fake content. Continue to give excuse. Excuse without evidence is not acceptable.

Can you not spam this thread with your ridiculous claims?
You cited the LEGAL DISCLAIMER, which is meant to be similar across whitepapers. The project is not developing a legal disclaimer, it is developing technology and a business, which are original content of the whitepaper.

Also, I don't care how many fancy quotes you Google. You have to be an absolute moron to think that a team generates its own legal disclaimer. The problem is you don't realize that you are citing the paper's legal disclaimer...

Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper.

What breed of idiots are you?
You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that.

Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life.

---

You could launch a video platform with less than $5,000 in capital. None of the existing decentralized video platforms matter because:
- They lack a network in the media sector
- Have no realistic content strategy for user acquisition
- Some don't even have a functioning product

Does Bitmov address this?
Yes. It's founded by the very guys that created Netflix's content strategy and kick-started Amazon Video. Business development capacity >>> tech, but for the matter of addressing technology, the platform is live and is in test-net, accessible for usage to all.

There are several logos on the site, including Netflix and Pluto TV, but they are placed for comparison purposes in an infographic, which is the exact opposite of claiming an endorsement from these companies.

---

For the time being, it's for accredited investors, specifically strategic ones, only. The purpose of this thread is to drive attention towards test-net.

BitMovio plagiarized whitepaper.
Scam Accusation.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/deleted-5194285

theres so many already established blockchain video platforms, how are you any different?
how will you compare to projects that have had years of development like LBRY?
you have some big names logos in your graphic, are you legally allowed to use DISNEYS logo? :O
that seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen unless you already have a partnership.... which you 99% chance dont as Disney has publicly spoken about wanting to make their OWN video platform

I could not find expected token price in the project WP. Are there plans to predict it ?
Are you going to expand collaboration just with Asian and North America`s markets ?

Reserved - Announcements

Reserved - FAQ

Note: Neither I nor DAOmaker.com are affiliated with the project. I am here for relay information.