Topic: [ANN] bitqy (BQ) now listed on C-CEX (Read 1935 times)

Hi! How can I join your slack? There is no option to "sign up"
Checked your video - how will you receive your profit? All 30% margin is distributed between affiliates, customer, business, and referrals...
Right now 74% of tokens are held by one wallet. If you are holding almost all coins, the system is not decentralized((

No he hasn't ...

See http://rizzn.com/2017/05/17/ask-doctor-bitcoin-do-you-endorse-the-bitqy-token/

People behind keyboards appear to have difficulties with facts, a strong desire to destroy, an a never-ending propensity for negative energy.

Boy oh Boy! A lot of non-critical analysis Googling going on here. Maybe Google is one of the root cause of the thumbing down of intelligence in the human race.

But of course, I can't conclude that. I would need to do more research, data crunching, analysis, re-analysis, sampling, thinking while throwing a batch of factorial analysis to get to the bottom of my premise.

Be back in 3 years. Maybe not ... Google search as we know it today most likely will be extinct. Halleluah!

I'm not sure how you expect me to respond to this.

I continue to work with bitqyck because I make recommendations, and they have established a pattern in the last couple of months of following them. I don't know what's in their heart, but I know what my intentions are. As I said, I'm not invested in bitqy, not because I don't think it has no potential, but because I want to avoid any appearance of impropriety.

We're in a phase of blockchain development where, yes, there is still fertile ground for innovation, but there has been paved a way for application and distribution of existing refined technologies. Bitqyck largely falls into that latter category. Creating a rewards token isn't hugely innovative, and neither is using a blockchain to secure ownership in a corporation, but it is a smart application of the technology, and it introduces a layer of transparency to corporate governance that (and the bitqyck guys may not like me saying this publicly) has historically been lacking in many network marketing organizations through modern history.

I see a proper application of blockchain technology to this effort as a (yes, lucrative) path to algorithmically enforcing business ethics. This is a vision the founders of bitqyck have, at least to me, have expressed strong agreement with.

NewWorldCoiner, thanks for pointing out all these obvious truth. I will not invest a sat in that scam. I hope all those scammer get karma back to them some day.

We are! Gators beating up on Michigan nicely.

I'm not a fan of this bitcoin forum stuff. People don't seem to want to find out the truth. They just want to attack people for no reason.

By the way, Mike is going to do some social promotions for these new services this week. We are going to probably start on Monday. Nice job on the bitqyck corporate governance / voting event going on. Very exciting! Mike said this is something never done before in cryptocurrency.

Game is back on so I'm going offline. Have a good day.

Thanks Pete. Sorry for Mike being dragged into this. Enjoy the game today!

Following this post and must say that we are disappointed in the tone of this. @NewWorldCoiner - we would expect a lot more from you with your "Senior" level here.

To clarify:

1) POTENTL allows customers to use bitqy in payment for a few services and would welcome a deeper partnership with bitqyck
2) We believe whole heartedly in their business model and business plan as well as their leadership
3) Thank you for promoting Mike Magolnick's Twitter account
4) Mike Magolnick is NOT and NEVER WAS involved in a pump and dump nor was he found to ever be part of a pump and dump. He was named in a 2010 investigation from a situation that happened in 2007. The big "to do" about the whole thing ended up being nothing. The only issue that the SEC finalized was whether certain legal opinions issued to the company had the correct restrictive period dates on it. Not only was there nothing criminal about the situation, but there was nothing found that there was any wrong doing at all. Mike doesn't hide from any of this and his background, reputation, and long list of references is stellar.
5) Mike does contract work for bitqyck helping with the company's brand strategy as well as cryptocurrency operations. He has a strong background in compliance and social media and is working very close with the company to ensure things done are executed the right way.

Here is the bottom line. Outside of Mike, which was probably a mistake for you to mention him negatively, this is a company that acknowledges things weren't always great in the past. We are ones who believe that the past is the past. You give people a chance like we gave bitqyck a chance. This is no joke that they are running a tight ship. We read your posts and in restrospect it is clear that you are very aggressive and not very professional in your delivery.

If you want to reach out to Mike directly to talk to him about these comments, email him at [email protected].

Ok Pinocchio. Good one pulling half stories from 10 years ago. You are looking more stupid and childish every time you comment. Walk away puppet, walk away.

Mike Magolnick's case was a big nothing burger from 2007.  Great reporting on your part dipshit.

Jason Guck is an Affiliate and too bad on you but we don't judge people or discriminate because of alleged actions.

You = Pinocchio the judgmental puppet.
Find something better to do.

Good one Dr Bitcoin. Still not learned to google then?

Apparently Bitqyck is partnered with Potentl, whose CEO is Mike Magolnick.

https://twitter.com/magolnick?lang=en

https://twitter.com/POTENTL/status/891703291020795905

Do a google search for Mike Magolnick SEC, guess what you find? He's a pump and dumper.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2010/lr21565.htm

https://www.law360.com/articles/143016/sec-mobile-ready-ceo-reach-insider-trading-deal

Bitqyck is also promoted by Jason Guck.

https://www.facebook.com/mybitqyck/posts/1329661600416850

https://www.jason-guck.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qASQ4tf4Ngo

Do a google search for Jason Guck, guess what you find? He's been indicted by the Fed's on charges of defrauding investors of millions of dollars.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdny/pr/three-men-arrested-wire-fraud-scheme-involving-multilevel-marketing-company

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/06/23/raig-jerabeck-jason-guck-and-jeb-tyler-5-linx-fraud-grand-jurt/423597001/#

http://www.whec.com/news/feds-may-seize-two-canandaigua-lakefront-homes/4538860/

This is why we're reticent Dr Bitcoin. Leopards never change their spots. Enjoy your 30 pieces of silver.

Hello, all.

It's been a busy week. I heard that my name was mentioned on this thread, but I hadn't had a chance to respond to it in a timely fashion.

To clarify my involvement, everything I wrote in my blog post was true, at least to the extent that I understood things from the perspective of a vendor with a severed relationship and limited insight into bitqyck's inner workings without me.

About two months ago, one of the founders of bitqyck reached out to me on a technical matter (unrelated to cryptocurrency) and expressed a desire to address several of the issues I raised in my blog post as well as other technical questions that are starting to arise during the day-to-day operations of the company.

About a month into periodic discussions, we engaged in a contractual relationship in which I've served as a technical consultant (via my agency) on several initiatives, including interacting with public exchanges, helping craft technically accurate sales verbiage, and general matchmaking between other clients of mine in the local startup community.

When we engaged, I told them I'd be happy to lend a hand and work in the background. I'd even be happy to act once again as a spokesperson of the token again if they'd agree to an independent legal and technical review of the solidity code for the ERC-20 token. This is a process that is still underway. I don't have any doubt, given my ongoing interactions with the founders and the new management team, that their intentions are to build a sustainable company and to break new technical boundaries in the process.

As I talked about in my blog post, what drew me to this project was their willingness to apply theoretical concepts of the Digital Autonomous Organization as a practical matter. Given the state of blockchain right now, it's not something that could (or should) be done in one leap. The original architecture and token roadmap I worked with the founding team is still the current roadmap. One of my goals in working with them over the next few weeks and months is to help them document and share that roadmap publicly.

I hope this clarifies things. I understand the reticence of the geek community to embrace anything that remotely sounds like network marketing, but for what it's worth, to me the core team involved with the bitqy token have demonstrated an earnest desire to do things the right way.

By way of disclosure: I still own no bitqy, and my company is paid in plain ol' US fiat for my work with bitqyck. I told them I'd accept Bitcoin, but given the bull run it's on this month, I'm guessing they're wanting to HODL.

You posted the same exact thing on the other forum and once again I will reiterate so that everyone else can see that you are only here to stir a pot that doesn't exist.

Sorry to disappoint but Dr Bitcoin is most definitely still in the building. Here is a picture from a week ago where he is sitting right smack in the middle of a meeting with some of the HQ team - https://www.facebook.com/bitqyck/photos/a.271923646608761.1073741829.150222345445559/296421530825639/?type=3&theater.

We love bitcointalk and what it represents but cannot stand when people use this forum as a place to post things they know absolutely nothing about without researching it first.

I see Doctor Bitcoin has now left the building - http://rizzn.com/2017/05/17/ask-doctor-bitcoin-do-you-endorse-the-bitqy-token/

You are obviously a child. Standing on your side of the playground shouting, "you're wrong, no you're wrong, no you're wrong." There is no winner in a conversation like this. I would be happy to pick apart this company and cryptocurrency with you and show you what it is all really about. It seems like you are more apt to just sit there behind your computer calling people names than doing what's necessary to find out the real truth.

This happens to be an excellent business plan but you'll never find that out for yourself because it only looks like you are interested in childish bullshit.

Time will tell and you will eat your words. I will expect an apology from you when you see that what this company is doing is extraordinary. The question is, will you be part of the excitement or someone who sits on the sideline like a baby telling everyone else they shouldn't be part of something great because your feelings are hurt.

Refute the evidence if you can. If you can't, then which one of us is the liar? Hmm?

Like every scammer, you can't prove shit. All you can do is call me a puppet.

Is Mark making that video for you yet? Can't wait to see it.

Just what I thought. You're not interested in the truth. You're so high and mighty saying you want to "help people" but you're just like every other liar on the Internet with a ridiculous childish response.

I gave you an opportunity to come see things for yourself. Visit the office. Test our systems and actually meet the team so you can report to your loyal fans the truth as YOU see it and not as others will puppet you to think.

You will now be forever known as Pinocchio. Silly little wooden puppet that spouts lies.

Keep reporting Pinocchio. Keep reporting.

Shame on me? Uneducated am I? Fuck you douchebag, this is the same as all your other scams and pyramid schemes, and like all scammers, and you think you can brazen it out by saying all the evidence against you is non-credible, or unverified. So where's your verifiable proof then? An swanky office paid for with your ill-gotten gains? An offer to treat me like a king and bribe me with your shitcoin to get me on side? Good one. You can't even refute the evidence against you.

Tell you what, go and get Mark Hopkins to make another video stating that his article dated May 17th 2017 was incorrect and that he once again fully supports your project. Shouldn't be a problem if he's working on it full time for you. Maybe then you will convince 1 or 2 people on this forum that you're genuine, and that all the stuff on the internet making you look so bad is just rubbish from the uneducated masses.

Or you could sue me. Tell me, how many people have you sued for damaging your business and reputation with libelous articles and media coverage? Is it none?

Enjoy your freedom while it lasts asshole.

Shame on you for spouting an un-educated opinion based on non-credible Internet sites with non-verified information. Bitcointalk is a fantastic place to do exactly what you say - find and report the truth. So why don't you do just that, find the real truth. Get out from behind your computer and come visit the offices of bitqyck. 20,000 square feet across 2 floors of a downtown Dallas Texas hi-rise. If you want to come and get the real story, we will happily bring you in and treat you like a king as you tour the offices, meet the real staff and executive team, and sit and physically watch the business. I'll even arrange a one on one with Mr Bitcoin, Mark Hopkins himself who happens to be working nearly full time on bitqyck/bitqy projects. 

I will be happy to gift you some bitqy on top of it to show you how bitqy works, that we aren't hiding, that we are completely transparent, and are running a very solid business. I do think it would be important to see how bitqy works and you can't do that without owning some.

Basically stop your rant being guided by what idiots and the media wants you to read and regurgitate and find out the truth for yourself.

The invitation stands. Are you willing to be an adult and do your own physical research or a fake media puppet hiding behind someone else's words believing what other people tell you?

any detile thread for info coin? coin is only POS or POW or ICO?
I see low volume in c-cex
give me info detile sir