Is there any updates with this coin?
Black halo looked so promsing, but have not heard much since.
Back in the day, yeah. All the next generation ICO's changed the landscape. They're getting all the limelight and the money.
Anyway, dzimbeck, I'm dropping by here to ask what is different about Blackcoin's POS compared NXT's POS. I'm thinking of investing in Qtum's ICO (I know, I know, I'll be careful), and I see in their ANN thread that they will be using code based on Bitcoin Core 0.13 and use that to create a POS platform based on Blackcoin's POS 3.0. Is that even possible? And what's the big deal with BC's POS 3.0?
Thanks.
Bitcoin Core 0.13 is very new, there's no need to go with bleeding edge.
Blackcoin has been already moved to bitcoin core 0.12(is running in production and can bee seen in explorers like this one
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/blk/#!network .
What do you mean by Blackcoin has already been moved to Bitcoin Core 0.12? I have no idea what you're talking about, unless you don't too. Well then, touche!
There is no risk here, more stability and you won't miss anything they have in 0.13 too.
Core will backport everything to 0.12 (they have been already doing it..
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/c1b7421781b7a53485c6db4a6005a80e32267c9f )
BC POS 3.0 has to be done correctly, coins that claim to implement it, have done their version of POS 3.0 not the BC one, deviations can be easily seen in their code..
I want answers as to what are the differences in NXT's POS and Blackcoin's POS 3.0 and what makes it special. I guess I'll have to wait for dzimbeck to get back and explain.
..by the way.. where's the Qtum source? The link they provided doesn't work.
It will be available around March I think.
What do you mean by Blackcoin has already been moved to Bitcoin Core 0.12? I have no idea what you're talking about, unless you don't too. Well then, touche!
;P payblk is using 0.12.1 client(
https://payblk.blackcoin.io) for example. It is unsustainable to use 0.13 client, currently around 44 C++ developers alone have participated,
who created 1683 commits, done with POW in mind, impossible to review all their impact on POS.
... I looked at the article about why qtum went to 0.13 base and it doesn't make any sense whatsoever,
http://www.bikaifa.com/qtum-blockchain-ported-pos-3-0-to-bitcoin-core-0-13valid headers blockchain is in 0.12 too,
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/0.12/src/rpcblockchain.cpp#L7361. invalid This branch contains at least one invalid block
2. headers-only Not all blocks for this branch are available, but the headers are valid
3. valid-headers All blocks are available for this branch, but they were never fully validated4. valid-fork This branch is not part of the active chain, but is fully validated
5 active This is the tip of the active main chain, which is certainly valid
It cannot be used for synchronizing, you can easily end on a fork.
Bitcoin had a scripting language similiar to eth in his early days too, which was exploited and was removed
and Qtum is bringing it back? Oh my..DAO
Forking code is not enough, Bitcoin is full of magic numbers, you have to fork community and all the networks characteristics to have it work properly
and there is no need for that
https://nm.reddit.com/r/blackcoin/comments/5m7af3/what_is_going_on_in_blk/dc42wgu/What is going on in BLK