Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [BLTZ] [IPO Hybrid] BlitzCoin | proof of concept coin | pure speculative - page 38. (Read 200970 times)

newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
I' ve just send some BLTZ from Bittrex to my BLTZ Mac wallet, the strange thing is that I dont see the tx on the block explorer? :/

Nevermind, withdrawal has status " reserved"  on Bittrex.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Blitz is listed on whatmine.com (Mining Profitability)!!!
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
where my blitz coinz??
i deposited @coinano.com  Huh
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
I have been working on the idea of a multipool to drive some interest to the coin after the mining phase is over this should of course increase the value of the coin.

A more challenging problem is to find a way of using the multipool as a medium to secure the network without affecting its profitability too much from the point of view of the users, some alternatives:

  • Redirect 1% of the hashrate to blitzcoin and charge 1% as administration fee, since most of the multipools charge 2% as an administration fee this would be competitive. This approach is quite simple for the user but is not really secure if there is only one multipool, this approach would work only if there are multiple multipools working the same way but it could be a waste of resources if the hahsrate is too high and the network could be secured with much less than that.
  • The second alternative is to have a pool that disconnect miners X minutes after Y number of hours, and encouraging the users to use a failover to solo mine or use a pool that are mining blitz. Of course the problem with this is that the users must be honest about it and use the "down time" to secure the network, instead of mining some other more profitable coin but if they are interested in the multipool it means that they are somehow interested in the coin success so they should have the incentive to do it. The challenge is to make the pool profitable even taking into account this downtimes and also to find the correct parameters for X and Y.

If there is some interest from people to operate the pool I might give it a spin and release it as an open source project, since I have no problem developing it but don't have the time to operate it myself.

Also I am a backend developer so graphic/web designers are also welcomed to help.

What do you guys think ?.

multipool works well for blackcoin so i think it is a good idea.

but i'm very sceptical for second alternative.
I don't think you can trust on honesty in this business.
just my 2 cents and sorry for my english.
i know it is crap Smiley

No worries, English is not my first language either, and is also crap but who cares ...

Third alternative, force the users of the multipool to mine by paying out only if the address provided has found at least a block in the last X days/hours ?..

i don't understand enough of all the tech mambo jambo for crypto coins, but can this be problematic with bad luck?
you maybe also have to consider rigs with hardware problems or problems with internet connection and stuff like that ...
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I have been working on the idea of a multipool to drive some interest to the coin after the mining phase is over this should of course increase the value of the coin.

A more challenging problem is to find a way of using the multipool as a medium to secure the network without affecting its profitability too much from the point of view of the users, some alternatives:

  • Redirect 1% of the hashrate to blitzcoin and charge 1% as administration fee, since most of the multipools charge 2% as an administration fee this would be competitive. This approach is quite simple for the user but is not really secure if there is only one multipool, this approach would work only if there are multiple multipools working the same way but it could be a waste of resources if the hahsrate is too high and the network could be secured with much less than that.
  • The second alternative is to have a pool that disconnect miners X minutes after Y number of hours, and encouraging the users to use a failover to solo mine or use a pool that are mining blitz. Of course the problem with this is that the users must be honest about it and use the "down time" to secure the network, instead of mining some other more profitable coin but if they are interested in the multipool it means that they are somehow interested in the coin success so they should have the incentive to do it. The challenge is to make the pool profitable even taking into account this downtimes and also to find the correct parameters for X and Y.

If there is some interest from people to operate the pool I might give it a spin and release it as an open source project, since I have no problem developing it but don't have the time to operate it myself.

Also I am a backend developer so graphic/web designers are also welcomed to help.

What do you guys think ?.

multipool works well for blackcoin so i think it is a good idea.

but i'm very sceptical for second alternative.
I don't think you can trust on honesty in this business.
just my 2 cents and sorry for my english.
i know it is crap Smiley

No worries, English is not my first language either, and is also crap but who cares ...

Third alternative, force the users of the multipool to mine by paying out only if the address provided has found at least a block in the last X days/hours ?..
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
I have been working on the idea of a multipool to drive some interest to the coin after the mining phase is over this should of course increase the value of the coin.

A more challenging problem is to find a way of using the multipool as a medium to secure the network without affecting its profitability too much from the point of view of the users, some alternatives:

  • Redirect 1% of the hashrate to blitzcoin and charge 1% as administration fee, since most of the multipools charge 2% as an administration fee this would be competitive. This approach is quite simple for the user but is not really secure if there is only one multipool, this approach would work only if there are multiple multipools working the same way but it could be a waste of resources if the hahsrate is too high and the network could be secured with much less than that.
  • The second alternative is to have a pool that disconnect miners X minutes after Y number of hours, and encouraging the users to use a failover to solo mine or use a pool that are mining blitz. Of course the problem with this is that the users must be honest about it and use the "down time" to secure the network, instead of mining some other more profitable coin but if they are interested in the multipool it means that they are somehow interested in the coin success so they should have the incentive to do it. The challenge is to make the pool profitable even taking into account this downtimes and also to find the correct parameters for X and Y.

If there is some interest from people to operate the pool I might give it a spin and release it as an open source project, since I have no problem developing it but don't have the time to operate it myself.

Also I am a backend developer so graphic/web designers are also welcomed to help.

What do you guys think ?.

multipool works well for blackcoin so i think it is a good idea.

but i'm very sceptical for second alternative.
I don't think you can trust on honesty in this business.
just my 2 cents and sorry for my english.
i know it is crap Smiley
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
支持!!!加油!!!!!!!!!

You look like Chinese
To make a friend with you?
With the progress of

Of course you can! Very happy to be friends! My msn account: [email protected]!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I have been working on the idea of a multipool to drive some interest to the coin after the mining phase is over this should of course increase the value of the coin.

A more challenging problem is to find a way of using the multipool as a medium to secure the network without affecting its profitability too much from the point of view of the users, some alternatives:

  • Redirect 1% of the hashrate to blitzcoin and charge 1% as administration fee, since most of the multipools charge 2% as an administration fee this would be competitive. This approach is quite simple for the user but is not really secure if there is only one multipool, this approach would work only if there are multiple multipools working the same way but it could be a waste of resources if the hahsrate is too high and the network could be secured with much less than that.
  • The second alternative is to have a pool that disconnect miners X minutes after Y number of hours, and encouraging the users to use a failover to solo mine or use a pool that are mining blitz. Of course the problem with this is that the users must be honest about it and use the "down time" to secure the network, instead of mining some other more profitable coin but if they are interested in the multipool it means that they are somehow interested in the coin success so they should have the incentive to do it. The challenge is to make the pool profitable even taking into account this downtimes and also to find the correct parameters for X and Y.

If there is some interest from people to operate the pool I might give it a spin and release it as an open source project, since I have no problem developing it but don't have the time to operate it myself.

Also I am a backend developer so graphic/web designers are also welcomed to help.

What do you guys think ?.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Admin of DwarfPool.com
On the right chain!

DwarfPool


- Anonymous pool, no registration required

- Autopayouts from 10 BLTZ

- True round based PPS (proportional your shares), 1% fee

- DDoS protection by different providers

- Free choice of 3 server locations worldwide

- Separate workers with the same wallet-id for better vardiff and detailed per rig statistics

- Monitoring of every rig via email

- Maxmimum transparency, no stealing shares and no hidden fees!

- Greatly optimized stratum pool engine

- Works with all known GPU and CPU miners.

- Stratum protocol: 3346

- Supported new Stratum and old Getwork protocols.

Servers:
erebor.dwarfpool.com (France)
moria.dwarfpool.com (USA)
eredluin.dwarfpool.com (Asia/Japan)


DwarfPool Quality you can trust!
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
支持!!!加油!!!!!!!!!

You look like Chinese
To make a friend with you?
With the progress of
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
支持!!!加油!!!!!!!!!
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
The blitzcoin is  split? Why only half of it at the start. Huh

I am a rookie
Hope to get more people to explain
The community of people are good people
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
这硬币,蛋疼钱包同步。节点无贞操。。

How else could you
After all, just a little time
Be patient
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
这硬币,蛋疼钱包同步。节点无贞操。。

Every time when the wallet synchronization
sr. member
Activity: 887
Merit: 253
这硬币,蛋疼钱包同步。节点无贞操。。
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Source of knowledge is experience. A.E.
The blitzcoin is  split? Why only half of it at the start. Huh

No split  Smiley

I'm mining  +24h on xhash.net...sounds very good  Cool
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Your chance to win!

I wanted to remind everyone that in less than FIVE HOURS we will have our fourth drawing, this means we will be adding two more coins to our exchange!
The good news is that you don't need to be at the top of the list for a chance to win, all you need is a minium of 100 votes (more is better, of course  Cheesy) and you will be entered into the random drawing which will be streamed live.
 
Vote now @ https://www.cryptoaltex.com/index.php?page=newcoin
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Hello All,

   CryptoCoinz has done it again. Here is the New Mac OSX Wallet. Wallet has been scanned for Virus. Wallet works Great. We have included the nodes into the wallet so NO need to make Conf.


https://mega.co.nz/#!HFR0BI5T!s2n97Bea60HwpNanKTyLO7hqmno4xq56Ui8nYTKW_ts




added to OP

anyway to make this wallet work for older version of mac osx? running snow leopard and it wont open. thanks
Pages:
Jump to: