To start, botchain uses the immutable ledger features of a blockchain to provide archiving, compliance, auditability, and proof of existence for bot activity. If a bot of some sort has to be part of a compliance workflow like HIPAA or SOC2, that will now be possible.
...
...
Everyone who wants to develop for Botchain or use bots on Botchain will need tokens.
...
We believe in the future, bots will need their own currency as more and more happens in the bot-economy. ...
I don't think I fully understand the bot-economy yet. I read the botchain article, but still I don't see the relevance quite fully.
If I am a developer of a bot, the logging of what my bots are doing is significant to me, but I wouldn't be so concerned about what my competitor's bots are doing. Unless I want to reverse engineer and see how they come to beat my bot's algorithm.
Since the bots are to be used in transactions, the relevance would the transactional details which should be recorded on the public ledger.
I also fail to see how botchain translates to a new botchain token(s)/coin(s).
As a developer of an ecosystem, it would certainly benefit you, but as a bot developer, I don't see why I wouldn't be able to use other tokens/coins. Or use some asset translation coins and limit my developmental effort.