🔥[ANN] BreezeCoin combining Real Estate with Crypto🔥 - page 14.

TmottaDing

member

Activity: 234

Merit: 10

Quote from: Breezecoin.io on February 25, 2020, 04:27:05 AM

There wasnt a public ICO, basically it was just private investors for around 6 million of token.

At the moment we are redesigning our Breezecoin Homepage to match it with our Breezedemar Homepage. Linkedin is of course a part of it

Also you can find background infos on the Breezedemar Homepage. New BReezecoin Homepage should be ready next week and we have some good upcoming stuff scheduled for the next week.

Other ICO failed to get investment because those were not having any kind of real business backing it up. This is classic example how project should collect funds. First have some running business then get some private investors on board and then launch ICO.

If all projects follows this practice, then, I think good days for crypto will come.

Breezecoin.io

copper member

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

There wasnt a public ICO, basically it was just private investors for around 6 million of token.

At the moment we are redesigning our Breezecoin Homepage to match it with our Breezedemar Homepage. Linkedin is of course a part of it

Also you can find background infos on the Breezedemar Homepage. New BReezecoin Homepage should be ready next week and we have some good upcoming stuff scheduled for the next week.

princecharles

copper member

Activity: 210

Merit: 1

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 24, 2020, 03:51:31 PM

Quote from: TmottaDing on February 24, 2020, 02:29:32 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 23, 2020, 11:55:10 PM

It's actually amazing that a project as refined as breeze coin did not conduct any ICO or tokensales and have been able to make such a laudable achievement within a couple of years. There are several projects in the cryptocurrency space who were able to raise large sum of money during their tokensales and we can't find any accomplishments by the team and promoters. This translates to one fact, which is that projects could become successful even without conducting tokensales and raising funds from the public.

There was no ICO, then how these tokens ended up at exchange? Was is through same staking option,.where people bought packages and then after six months tokens delivered at exchange for trading?

I believe its possible for projects to be listed on exchanges without the team sourcing for funds from the public. In fact, it's even more popular now because most investors are not attracted to ICO investment owing to the increased failure rate of new projects.

I agree with you, the truth is that tokensales are getting a high failure rate by the day. Some projects even go as far as inflating the amount raised on tokensales to give them an increased reputation and encourage more persons to participate. The best way out is for the project promoters to fund the listing of the tokens on exchanges and recoup their funds slowly as trading is ongoing.

Henrytrust

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

Quote from: CaVO32 on February 24, 2020, 05:33:59 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 05:19:38 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 24, 2020, 12:50:46 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

I don't think the issue of franchise was among the modalities enshrined in breeze coin whitepaper, but I still believe its a great initiative. If the breeze coin team can manage this segment of the project, it would be an addition to the project strategy. I would advise that Breezcoin focus on their present business model and get the best out of it, before including other models for expansion and diversification.

Well I see from your angle and I think you have a solid point here, which is in developing of their current model and making sure that they make good progress that way they can work a franchise which will bring bigger revenue.

if they can prove that their current model will be successful for their upcoming projects that would be a good testament if their business model really works. they should prove first it within their planned projects. once their model is tested and verified, franchising would be an easy task later on. but just wondering why on the team's section from their website, they have no profile links attached? a huge project like this should give us all the necessary links to check its authenticity.

I also noticed the profile link verification issue. The team members ought to have a LinkedIn profile which would be easily accessible to anyone who wants to know more about them and their accomplishments over the years. It's a good strategy to boost the trust people have for the team and project.

justsimpleram

jr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 1

bithostcoin.io

Quote from: Zurcermozz on February 24, 2020, 08:39:17 PM

Quote from: CaVO32 on February 24, 2020, 05:33:59 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 05:19:38 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 24, 2020, 12:50:46 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

I don't think the issue of franchise was among the modalities enshrined in breeze coin whitepaper, but I still believe its a great initiative. If the breeze coin team can manage this segment of the project, it would be an addition to the project strategy. I would advise that Breezcoin focus on their present business model and get the best out of it, before including other models for expansion and diversification.

Well I see from your angle and I think you have a solid point here, which is in developing of their current model and making sure that they make good progress that way they can work a franchise which will bring bigger revenue.

if they can prove that their current model will be successful for their upcoming projects that would be a good testament if their business model really works. they should prove first it within their planned projects. once their model is tested and verified, franchising would be an easy task later on. but just wondering why on the team's section from their website, they have no profile links attached? a huge project like this should give us all the necessary links to check its authenticity.

Hmmm. Yeah I've got your point they don't have any info's in their website, like their background or thing, even in whitepaper, I didn't notice that one, maybe they can explain on it.

That's one of them should priority right now people and investors want to know this kind of information in one project they want to participate in. But I think the team is working on this one right now.

Zurcermozz

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 16

Quote from: CaVO32 on February 24, 2020, 05:33:59 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 05:19:38 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 24, 2020, 12:50:46 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

I don't think the issue of franchise was among the modalities enshrined in breeze coin whitepaper, but I still believe its a great initiative. If the breeze coin team can manage this segment of the project, it would be an addition to the project strategy. I would advise that Breezcoin focus on their present business model and get the best out of it, before including other models for expansion and diversification.

Well I see from your angle and I think you have a solid point here, which is in developing of their current model and making sure that they make good progress that way they can work a franchise which will bring bigger revenue.

if they can prove that their current model will be successful for their upcoming projects that would be a good testament if their business model really works. they should prove first it within their planned projects. once their model is tested and verified, franchising would be an easy task later on. but just wondering why on the team's section from their website, they have no profile links attached? a huge project like this should give us all the necessary links to check its authenticity.

Hmmm. Yeah I've got your point they don't have any info's in their website, like their background or thing, even in whitepaper, I didn't notice that one, maybe they can explain on it.

CaVO32

full member

Activity: 1848

Merit: 158

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 05:19:38 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 24, 2020, 12:50:46 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

I don't think the issue of franchise was among the modalities enshrined in breeze coin whitepaper, but I still believe its a great initiative. If the breeze coin team can manage this segment of the project, it would be an addition to the project strategy. I would advise that Breezcoin focus on their present business model and get the best out of it, before including other models for expansion and diversification.

Well I see from your angle and I think you have a solid point here, which is in developing of their current model and making sure that they make good progress that way they can work a franchise which will bring bigger revenue.

if they can prove that their current model will be successful for their upcoming projects that would be a good testament if their business model really works. they should prove first it within their planned projects. once their model is tested and verified, franchising would be an easy task later on. but just wondering why on the team's section from their website, they have no profile links attached? a huge project like this should give us all the necessary links to check its authenticity.

Maebeo2017

jr. member

Activity: 242

Merit: 1

I am A Champion for all I care

Quote from: princecharles on February 24, 2020, 12:50:46 PM

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

I don't think the issue of franchise was among the modalities enshrined in breeze coin whitepaper, but I still believe its a great initiative. If the breeze coin team can manage this segment of the project, it would be an addition to the project strategy. I would advise that Breezcoin focus on their present business model and get the best out of it, before including other models for expansion and diversification.

Well I see from your angle and I think you have a solid point here, which is in developing of their current model and making sure that they make good progress that way they can work a franchise which will bring bigger revenue.

Henrytrust

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

Quote from: TmottaDing on February 24, 2020, 02:29:32 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 23, 2020, 11:55:10 PM

It's actually amazing that a project as refined as breeze coin did not conduct any ICO or tokensales and have been able to make such a laudable achievement within a couple of years. There are several projects in the cryptocurrency space who were able to raise large sum of money during their tokensales and we can't find any accomplishments by the team and promoters. This translates to one fact, which is that projects could become successful even without conducting tokensales and raising funds from the public.

There was no ICO, then how these tokens ended up at exchange? Was is through same staking option,.where people bought packages and then after six months tokens delivered at exchange for trading?

I believe its possible for projects to be listed on exchanges without the team sourcing for funds from the public. In fact, it's even more popular now because most investors are not attracted to ICO investment owing to the increased failure rate of new projects.

ethtrader16

copper member

Activity: 658

Merit: 0

Empowering crypto w/ sustainable energy

Quote from: TmottaDing on February 24, 2020, 02:29:32 PM

Quote from: princecharles on February 23, 2020, 11:55:10 PM

It's actually amazing that a project as refined as breeze coin did not conduct any ICO or tokensales and have been able to make such a laudable achievement within a couple of years. There are several projects in the cryptocurrency space who were able to raise large sum of money during their tokensales and we can't find any accomplishments by the team and promoters. This translates to one fact, which is that projects could become successful even without conducting tokensales and raising funds from the public.

There was no ICO, then how these tokens ended up at exchange? Was is through same staking option,.where people bought packages and then after six months tokens delivered at exchange for trading?

Yeah, that's true, I also would like to know about the listing directly on exchange, how people have these tokens without having any ICO or IEO?

TmottaDing

member

Activity: 234

Merit: 10

Quote from: princecharles on February 23, 2020, 11:55:10 PM

It's actually amazing that a project as refined as breeze coin did not conduct any ICO or tokensales and have been able to make such a laudable achievement within a couple of years. There are several projects in the cryptocurrency space who were able to raise large sum of money during their tokensales and we can't find any accomplishments by the team and promoters. This translates to one fact, which is that projects could become successful even without conducting tokensales and raising funds from the public.

There was no ICO, then how these tokens ended up at exchange? Was is through same staking option,.where people bought packages and then after six months tokens delivered at exchange for trading?

Antana

member

Activity: 174

Merit: 10

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

Current focus of the Breez team is on US, Turkey, and Germany I think. I have not gone through all pages of their whitepaper, but I think their focus would be more on popular destination and then slowly at undiscovered/less popular one.

princecharles

copper member

Activity: 210

Merit: 1

Quote from: Maebeo2017 on February 24, 2020, 10:49:28 AM

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

I don't think the issue of franchise was among the modalities enshrined in breeze coin whitepaper, but I still believe its a great initiative. If the breeze coin team can manage this segment of the project, it would be an addition to the project strategy. I would advise that Breezcoin focus on their present business model and get the best out of it, before including other models for expansion and diversification.

Maebeo2017

jr. member

Activity: 242

Merit: 1

I am A Champion for all I care

I'm a property owner and developer in my own country and I'm curious to know if Breezecoin will have a franchise network and opportunity in the future where small players in a tourist country have the opportunity to be placed under the Breezecoin company structure... Will there be that opportunity?

Henrytrust

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

Quote from: justsimpleram on February 23, 2020, 11:58:15 PM

Quote from: Zurcermozz on February 23, 2020, 06:01:24 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 23, 2020, 11:37:23 AM

Quote from: Antana on February 23, 2020, 03:37:20 AM

Quote from: princecharles on February 22, 2020, 03:02:33 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 22, 2020, 04:53:46 AM

I personally believe that the lockup period of 6 months is too long. I know some projects even offer lock up period of one year, but I would prefer if there are several options as it relates to the lock up period to give investors the opportunity to make their choices.

I'm in agreement with your opinion as it relates with several options for individuals who love to stake tokens. It would be great to have different durations like 6 months, 3, months, 1 year, etc. This would create an avenue for all investors irrespective of their philosophy of time.

I personally don't think option of choosing different period will provide much benefit. They have carefully selected period of 6 months which is small or not too far. It gives enough time for both (project and investors) sufficient time to hold, see and then decided next step.

The period of six months may not be categorically small, I have seen several projects whose staking duration is above 6 months, many are for a duration of one year. But it would be more soothing when the duration are flexible and give people a chance to decide on several options.

Hmmmm, I see, Investment is not something we can get in a short period of time, its more about a long waiting, and sometimes more than a year, but with these 6 months - return is a really good deal.

The long term investment is low risk and good offer for the people who are not 24/7 in business and crypto world you will just wait a long time for your investment to grow in just a months or years.

I personally won't go for a long term investment in this space. My reason is simply because of the distrust I have in the industry. A project could be doing so well initially, only for us to see the value nosedive and the team abandoned the project. Its rather very unfortunate that several persons are loosing trust in the cryptocurrency industry.

Zurcermozz

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 16

Quote from: justsimpleram on February 23, 2020, 11:58:15 PM

Quote from: Zurcermozz on February 23, 2020, 06:01:24 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 23, 2020, 11:37:23 AM

Quote from: Antana on February 23, 2020, 03:37:20 AM

Quote from: princecharles on February 22, 2020, 03:02:33 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 22, 2020, 04:53:46 AM

I personally believe that the lockup period of 6 months is too long. I know some projects even offer lock up period of one year, but I would prefer if there are several options as it relates to the lock up period to give investors the opportunity to make their choices.

I'm in agreement with your opinion as it relates with several options for individuals who love to stake tokens. It would be great to have different durations like 6 months, 3, months, 1 year, etc. This would create an avenue for all investors irrespective of their philosophy of time.

I personally don't think option of choosing different period will provide much benefit. They have carefully selected period of 6 months which is small or not too far. It gives enough time for both (project and investors) sufficient time to hold, see and then decided next step.

The period of six months may not be categorically small, I have seen several projects whose staking duration is above 6 months, many are for a duration of one year. But it would be more soothing when the duration are flexible and give people a chance to decide on several options.

Hmmmm, I see, Investment is not something we can get in a short period of time, its more about a long waiting, and sometimes more than a year, but with these 6 months - return is a really good deal.

The long term investment is low risk and good offer for the people who are not 24/7 in business and crypto world you will just wait a long time for your investment to grow in just a months or years.

Yes, I agree with you, it is a low risk and good offer if it hits and the project continues throughout the time, In my experience there are lots of projects who also have a win-win situation in these kinds of projects, and earn a lot of profit.

justsimpleram

jr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 1

bithostcoin.io

Quote from: Zurcermozz on February 23, 2020, 06:01:24 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 23, 2020, 11:37:23 AM

Quote from: Antana on February 23, 2020, 03:37:20 AM

Quote from: princecharles on February 22, 2020, 03:02:33 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 22, 2020, 04:53:46 AM

I personally believe that the lockup period of 6 months is too long. I know some projects even offer lock up period of one year, but I would prefer if there are several options as it relates to the lock up period to give investors the opportunity to make their choices.

I'm in agreement with your opinion as it relates with several options for individuals who love to stake tokens. It would be great to have different durations like 6 months, 3, months, 1 year, etc. This would create an avenue for all investors irrespective of their philosophy of time.

I personally don't think option of choosing different period will provide much benefit. They have carefully selected period of 6 months which is small or not too far. It gives enough time for both (project and investors) sufficient time to hold, see and then decided next step.

The period of six months may not be categorically small, I have seen several projects whose staking duration is above 6 months, many are for a duration of one year. But it would be more soothing when the duration are flexible and give people a chance to decide on several options.

Hmmmm, I see, Investment is not something we can get in a short period of time, its more about a long waiting, and sometimes more than a year, but with these 6 months - return is a really good deal.

The long term investment is low risk and good offer for the people who are not 24/7 in business and crypto world you will just wait a long time for your investment to grow in just a months or years.

princecharles

copper member

Activity: 210

Merit: 1

It's actually amazing that a project as refined as breeze coin did not conduct any ICO or tokensales and have been able to make such a laudable achievement within a couple of years. There are several projects in the cryptocurrency space who were able to raise large sum of money during their tokensales and we can't find any accomplishments by the team and promoters. This translates to one fact, which is that projects could become successful even without conducting tokensales and raising funds from the public.

Zurcermozz

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 16

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 23, 2020, 11:37:23 AM

Quote from: Antana on February 23, 2020, 03:37:20 AM

Quote from: princecharles on February 22, 2020, 03:02:33 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 22, 2020, 04:53:46 AM

I personally believe that the lockup period of 6 months is too long. I know some projects even offer lock up period of one year, but I would prefer if there are several options as it relates to the lock up period to give investors the opportunity to make their choices.

I'm in agreement with your opinion as it relates with several options for individuals who love to stake tokens. It would be great to have different durations like 6 months, 3, months, 1 year, etc. This would create an avenue for all investors irrespective of their philosophy of time.

I personally don't think option of choosing different period will provide much benefit. They have carefully selected period of 6 months which is small or not too far. It gives enough time for both (project and investors) sufficient time to hold, see and then decided next step.

The period of six months may not be categorically small, I have seen several projects whose staking duration is above 6 months, many are for a duration of one year. But it would be more soothing when the duration are flexible and give people a chance to decide on several options.

Hmmmm, I see, Investment is not something we can get in a short period of time, its more about a long waiting, and sometimes more than a year, but with these 6 months - return is a really good deal.

Henrytrust

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

Quote from: Antana on February 23, 2020, 03:37:20 AM

Quote from: princecharles on February 22, 2020, 03:02:33 PM

Quote from: Henrytrust on February 22, 2020, 04:53:46 AM

I personally believe that the lockup period of 6 months is too long. I know some projects even offer lock up period of one year, but I would prefer if there are several options as it relates to the lock up period to give investors the opportunity to make their choices.

I'm in agreement with your opinion as it relates with several options for individuals who love to stake tokens. It would be great to have different durations like 6 months, 3, months, 1 year, etc. This would create an avenue for all investors irrespective of their philosophy of time.

I personally don't think option of choosing different period will provide much benefit. They have carefully selected period of 6 months which is small or not too far. It gives enough time for both (project and investors) sufficient time to hold, see and then decided next step.

The period of six months may not be categorically small, I have seen several projects whose staking duration is above 6 months, many are for a duration of one year. But it would be more soothing when the duration are flexible and give people a chance to decide on several options.

Topic: 🔥[ANN] BreezeCoin combining Real Estate with Crypto🔥 - page 14. (Read 2955 times)