I do not persuade.
OkayYou may express your opinion
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 42. (Read 226361 times)
You may express your opinion
Knowledge costs, but ignorance pays double.
People spend a lot of money on nonsense, let's be honest - this is a symbolic amount.
I do not persuade.
I showed the way - do what you see fit.
People spend a lot of money on nonsense, let's be honest - this is a symbolic amount.
I do not persuade.
I showed the way - do what you see fit.
I’m sure .. and I know who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
We are all Satoshi
– Could you please tell me which way I should go?
– It depends a lot on where you want to go
– Actually, I don’t care
– Then it doesn’t matter which way you go
– I’d just like to get somewhere
– Ah, you will definitely get there, if you only walk long enough..
I begin this post after I spent over 300 hours analyzing the public – released by the District Court of the South Florida District – materials from the case no. 18-cv-80176 by Ira Kleiman, the alleged heir of his brother – Dave Kleiman.
Despite many theories, discussions and conducted ‘internet’ investigations in search of the creator of Bitcoin, I decided to devote my time, which no one will return to me, to collect all this various information into one chronological whole.
Contrary to appearances, this case contains a lot of valuable information.
Now that I have a huge fact sheet in front of me, and in my head I have accumulated knowledge and knowledge about things that even seemed trivial to put them there, I can finally express my own opinion that yes .. I’m sure .. and I know who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
From this article, or rather from the data shared later, you will learn that Satoshi looked far ahead on how to secure, scale and use Bitcoin to become not only a global electronic cash system.
And it really doesn’t matter that most say otherwise .. it really doesn’t matter at this point ..
Someone gets in, someone gets out and the car goes on …
Even before you start reading the file that I have prepared and that will appear in the near future (I want you not to get lost in the maze of information and data), I will present you a brief background and the essence of the whole process.
You must be aware that the trial 9: 18-cv-80176 (Kleiman vs Wright) is a civil proceeding and NOT a criminal proceeding.
Civil proceedings are initiated by filing a statement of claim, and the entire burden of proof rests with the claimant, but .. there is no pre-trial investigation (unlike criminal proceedings) preceding the entire case before the court. This is a big difference, because in the preparatory proceedings many activities are carried out, which determine in the first place whether the prohibited act was committed and if so, whether it constitutes a crime. Preliminary proceedings are carried out by law enforcement agencies, eg the Police, during many activities ALL witnesses are interviewed, not selected witnesses, evidence and / or forensic traces are secured, but most importantly, the case is thoroughly explained, regardless of its size or time.
In a civil trial, all circumstances are not explained “comprehensively”, and the parties to the trial arbitrarily juggle the evidence, just so quickly I would summarize these differences; although I am referring to the Polish course of proceedings, I think that in this context it does not differ much from the American one.
Why am I writing about this? Don’t you recall the headlines of articles in which Dr. Craig Wright was called “Faketoshi”, “cheater”, “counterfeiter”?
First – since it was so obvious already in 2016. after its public disclosure, and then for 2 years (until 2018 – filing a lawsuit), every single quote, every publication was ubiquitously questioned and every speech and entry was mocked.
Second – since Ira (Dave’s brother) already in 2014 had knowledge of the existence of discrepancies in the documents of W&K Info Defense and the forging of the ownership transfer agreement is …
WHY has no criminal complaint been filed?
Instead, we have initiated a civil lawsuit with a huge entity that manages almost unlimited capital that finances litigation.
At this point, it is also important to bear in mind what the US lawsuits look like, and although many of them end in a settlement, the way in which conclusions are drawn has been deeply entrenched there in the way trials are conducted.
If you were to remember any US lawsuit so quickly, even from the movie, how do you imagine it? What image do you have in mind?
A full room of bystanders, cameras and attorneys in unbuttoned jackets, their hands in their pockets, torpedoing witnesses with uncomfortable questions? Isn’t it a bit like a show?
The show here results from a different model of adjudication, or to be more precise, from the adversarial principle used in the American judiciary, or simply speaking – the presence of a jury.
And although I could write a lot about it, I want you to understand that the “theatrical tricks” of lawyers are to make the greatest possible impression at the court and jury.
And the jurors? Well .. the jurors are selected from among ordinary citizens.
As for the “tricks” themselves, this is a deeper psychology that we usually ignore.
If you started reading the official trial documents yourself, you would notice how many conclusions from Ira’s attorneys include duplicate sentences “turned out to be false”, “falsified”, etc.
What do you think is underlined so much?
And what will be like during the trial, the panel of defendants repeatedly hearing the word “fake” – how will it affect them in the context of the assessment of Craig Wright? 😉
But it doesn’t really matter.
When reading what I have prepared, try to keep an open mind ..
Pay attention to the nuances, look for hidden intentions – who will gain and who will lose – and you will see whether what you have read about the case so far is true, a fraction of the truth or a twisted truth …
I tried to do it carefully, but I might have missed something as well.
I am currently broadcasting 1 episode every 3-4 days, there will be a dozen episodes.
I invite you.
PART 2 - https://streamanity.com/video/EPhjs6SZuMHp
PART 3 - https://streamanity.com/video/qbHySqsBt0Ce
PART 4 - https://streamanity.com/video/VEF9InuzS7sj
– It depends a lot on where you want to go
– Actually, I don’t care
– Then it doesn’t matter which way you go
– I’d just like to get somewhere
– Ah, you will definitely get there, if you only walk long enough..
I begin this post after I spent over 300 hours analyzing the public – released by the District Court of the South Florida District – materials from the case no. 18-cv-80176 by Ira Kleiman, the alleged heir of his brother – Dave Kleiman.
Despite many theories, discussions and conducted ‘internet’ investigations in search of the creator of Bitcoin, I decided to devote my time, which no one will return to me, to collect all this various information into one chronological whole.
Contrary to appearances, this case contains a lot of valuable information.
Now that I have a huge fact sheet in front of me, and in my head I have accumulated knowledge and knowledge about things that even seemed trivial to put them there, I can finally express my own opinion that yes .. I’m sure .. and I know who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
From this article, or rather from the data shared later, you will learn that Satoshi looked far ahead on how to secure, scale and use Bitcoin to become not only a global electronic cash system.
And it really doesn’t matter that most say otherwise .. it really doesn’t matter at this point ..
Someone gets in, someone gets out and the car goes on …
Even before you start reading the file that I have prepared and that will appear in the near future (I want you not to get lost in the maze of information and data), I will present you a brief background and the essence of the whole process.
You must be aware that the trial 9: 18-cv-80176 (Kleiman vs Wright) is a civil proceeding and NOT a criminal proceeding.
Civil proceedings are initiated by filing a statement of claim, and the entire burden of proof rests with the claimant, but .. there is no pre-trial investigation (unlike criminal proceedings) preceding the entire case before the court. This is a big difference, because in the preparatory proceedings many activities are carried out, which determine in the first place whether the prohibited act was committed and if so, whether it constitutes a crime. Preliminary proceedings are carried out by law enforcement agencies, eg the Police, during many activities ALL witnesses are interviewed, not selected witnesses, evidence and / or forensic traces are secured, but most importantly, the case is thoroughly explained, regardless of its size or time.
In a civil trial, all circumstances are not explained “comprehensively”, and the parties to the trial arbitrarily juggle the evidence, just so quickly I would summarize these differences; although I am referring to the Polish course of proceedings, I think that in this context it does not differ much from the American one.
Why am I writing about this? Don’t you recall the headlines of articles in which Dr. Craig Wright was called “Faketoshi”, “cheater”, “counterfeiter”?
First – since it was so obvious already in 2016. after its public disclosure, and then for 2 years (until 2018 – filing a lawsuit), every single quote, every publication was ubiquitously questioned and every speech and entry was mocked.
Second – since Ira (Dave’s brother) already in 2014 had knowledge of the existence of discrepancies in the documents of W&K Info Defense and the forging of the ownership transfer agreement is …
WHY has no criminal complaint been filed?
Instead, we have initiated a civil lawsuit with a huge entity that manages almost unlimited capital that finances litigation.
At this point, it is also important to bear in mind what the US lawsuits look like, and although many of them end in a settlement, the way in which conclusions are drawn has been deeply entrenched there in the way trials are conducted.
If you were to remember any US lawsuit so quickly, even from the movie, how do you imagine it? What image do you have in mind?
A full room of bystanders, cameras and attorneys in unbuttoned jackets, their hands in their pockets, torpedoing witnesses with uncomfortable questions? Isn’t it a bit like a show?
The show here results from a different model of adjudication, or to be more precise, from the adversarial principle used in the American judiciary, or simply speaking – the presence of a jury.
And although I could write a lot about it, I want you to understand that the “theatrical tricks” of lawyers are to make the greatest possible impression at the court and jury.
And the jurors? Well .. the jurors are selected from among ordinary citizens.
As for the “tricks” themselves, this is a deeper psychology that we usually ignore.
If you started reading the official trial documents yourself, you would notice how many conclusions from Ira’s attorneys include duplicate sentences “turned out to be false”, “falsified”, etc.
What do you think is underlined so much?
And what will be like during the trial, the panel of defendants repeatedly hearing the word “fake” – how will it affect them in the context of the assessment of Craig Wright? 😉
But it doesn’t really matter.
When reading what I have prepared, try to keep an open mind ..
Pay attention to the nuances, look for hidden intentions – who will gain and who will lose – and you will see whether what you have read about the case so far is true, a fraction of the truth or a twisted truth …
I tried to do it carefully, but I might have missed something as well.
I am currently broadcasting 1 episode every 3-4 days, there will be a dozen episodes.
I invite you.
PART 2 - https://streamanity.com/video/EPhjs6SZuMHp
PART 3 - https://streamanity.com/video/qbHySqsBt0Ce
PART 4 - https://streamanity.com/video/VEF9InuzS7sj
Why is Bitcoin still running
https://coingeek.com/kurt-wuckert-jr-lucas-forstmeyer-examine-economic-philosophical-foundation-of-bitcoin/
based on incentives
best onchain, that's the new an real thing
better give max capacity to that
https://coingeek.com/kurt-wuckert-jr-lucas-forstmeyer-examine-economic-philosophical-foundation-of-bitcoin/
based on incentives
best onchain, that's the new an real thing
better give max capacity to that
Do not fall for provocations
The coin is all right. Measures are being taken to enhance stability
Currently a file report making with law enforcement authorities and pursue legal action against the attacker
The coin is all right. Measures are being taken to enhance stability
Currently a file report making with law enforcement authorities and pursue legal action against the attacker
https://www.fxstreet.com/cryptocurrencies/news/bitcoin-sv-suspended-on-several-crypto-exchanges-over-risks-of-double-spending-attack-202107091331
Double-spending attack threatens the stability of the Bitcoin SV network
The Bitcoin Association, a Switzerland-based non-profit organization, shared news of a double-spending attack targeting Bitcoin SV on July 8. The attack was discovered during regular monitoring of the network by the infrastructure team.
Described as a block reorganization attack, it was carried out in an effort to mask the illegal double-spending of BSV tokens. Double-spending attacks are easier on Bitcoin SV due to the limited number of nodes on the network Indeed, it has a total of 199 nodes operating whereas Bitcoin (BTC) has over 83,000 nodes currently active.
Bitcoin SV forked from Bitcoin Cash (BCH) in late 2018, and it is suffering from the same vulnerability that was identified in the latter.
In 2019, Github user Bordalix had reached a 22% success rate on double-spending on the BCH network. The same can be expected on the BSV network as the zero confirmation algorithm makes it vulnerable to this exploit.
Double-spending attack threatens the stability of the Bitcoin SV network
The Bitcoin Association, a Switzerland-based non-profit organization, shared news of a double-spending attack targeting Bitcoin SV on July 8. The attack was discovered during regular monitoring of the network by the infrastructure team.
Described as a block reorganization attack, it was carried out in an effort to mask the illegal double-spending of BSV tokens. Double-spending attacks are easier on Bitcoin SV due to the limited number of nodes on the network Indeed, it has a total of 199 nodes operating whereas Bitcoin (BTC) has over 83,000 nodes currently active.
Bitcoin SV forked from Bitcoin Cash (BCH) in late 2018, and it is suffering from the same vulnerability that was identified in the latter.
In 2019, Github user Bordalix had reached a 22% success rate on double-spending on the BCH network. The same can be expected on the BSV network as the zero confirmation algorithm makes it vulnerable to this exploit.
Lol, nothing happened, but haters and criminals showed their faces now getting sued.
Who want to support such a bunch?
Yes Elon, and it s already here, but not amongst cypherpunk and Bitcoin haters
https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1413648245763477507
Big blocker Elon is here
https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1413648245763477507
Big blocker Elon is here
Cøbra, you will soon end up like McAfee. You'd think no one had guessed who was behind this attack.
Now do you understand who is at the head of BTC? This is anonymous hackers team. Absolutely non-transparent & shady fraudsters.
Governments & law on our side. This is just a beginning of ending of BTC-era with thier four-eyed geeks. Their crazy methods like ddos, 51% attacks, pumps & dumps etc will soon be a thing of the past.
We will crush this destructive sect until completely eradicated. BTC will be die slowly & painfully
Now do you understand who is at the head of BTC? This is anonymous hackers team. Absolutely non-transparent & shady fraudsters.
Governments & law on our side. This is just a beginning of ending of BTC-era with thier four-eyed geeks. Their crazy methods like ddos, 51% attacks, pumps & dumps etc will soon be a thing of the past.
We will crush this destructive sect until completely eradicated. BTC will be die slowly & painfully
Bitcoin Association statement: Zero tolerance for illegal attacks on the Bitcoin SV network
https://bitcoinassociation.net/bitcoin-association-statement-zero-tolerance-for-illegal-attacks-on-the-bitcoin-sv-network
Quote
Bitcoin Association (for BSV) is the Switzerland-based global industry organisation that supports the Bitcoin SV blockchain, one of the main chains of Bitcoin and the one which follows the original Bitcoin design. The Association provide the Bitcoin SV Node software and other infrastructure tools for the network.
Bitcoin Association and the BSV ecosystem have zero tolerance for illegal activity.
As part of regular monitoring of the network by the Bitcoin SV Infrastructure Team, the Association has been made aware of an illegal attack against the Bitcoin SV network. A malicious actor has recently been carrying out block re-organisation attacks on the Bitcoin SV network, which appear to be intentional acts in an effort to mask the illegal double-spending of coins.
The Bitcoin SV Infrastructure Team have identified one of the addresses connected with the attack (1G47mSr3oANXMafVrR8UC4pzV7FEAzo3r9) as being long associated with ransomware and other attacks on the BTC, BCH and BSV chains – so the malicious actor is engaged in illegal activity which could involve also BTC and BCH, and not just the BSV network.
Given the nature of the illegal attacks being carried out, it is in the best interests of the entire blockchain and digital currency industry to halt the illegal activity as quickly as possible.
Bitcoin Association intends to file reports with appropriate law enforcement authorities and work with affected parties to pursue all available legal remedies. Since first identifying the malicious activity, the Bitcoin SV Infrastructure Team has collected and documented relevant data to provide to appropriate authorities.
In parallel, Bitcoin Association has communicated directly with exchanges about the ongoing illegal activity and have advised them to freeze deposits attempted from any addresses associated with the malicious actor’s illegal double-spend activity. This has become standard practice for exchanges when they receive notice of coin addresses that have been involved in thefts, hacks or other illegal activities. Some exchanges may elect to take additional protective measures at their discretion.
Blockchains cannot themselves prevent bad actors. But by working together with exchanges, miners, transaction processors and other industry participants, collectively we can facilitate a safe and trusted environment for users of the Bitcoin SV network. There have been prior attacks on other blockchains, and it is time that industry participants demonstrate that such attacks are in fact illegal – just as attacks against other financial systems are illegal – and will be met with legal enforcement action. The Association will continue to maintain a zero-tolerance stance for illegal activity on the Bitcoin SV network and will respond to all malicious actors and activities accordingly.
Details for all inquiries, including anyone who may have been affected by the illegal attacks, is below.
Bitcoin Association and the BSV ecosystem have zero tolerance for illegal activity.
As part of regular monitoring of the network by the Bitcoin SV Infrastructure Team, the Association has been made aware of an illegal attack against the Bitcoin SV network. A malicious actor has recently been carrying out block re-organisation attacks on the Bitcoin SV network, which appear to be intentional acts in an effort to mask the illegal double-spending of coins.
The Bitcoin SV Infrastructure Team have identified one of the addresses connected with the attack (1G47mSr3oANXMafVrR8UC4pzV7FEAzo3r9) as being long associated with ransomware and other attacks on the BTC, BCH and BSV chains – so the malicious actor is engaged in illegal activity which could involve also BTC and BCH, and not just the BSV network.
Given the nature of the illegal attacks being carried out, it is in the best interests of the entire blockchain and digital currency industry to halt the illegal activity as quickly as possible.
Bitcoin Association intends to file reports with appropriate law enforcement authorities and work with affected parties to pursue all available legal remedies. Since first identifying the malicious activity, the Bitcoin SV Infrastructure Team has collected and documented relevant data to provide to appropriate authorities.
In parallel, Bitcoin Association has communicated directly with exchanges about the ongoing illegal activity and have advised them to freeze deposits attempted from any addresses associated with the malicious actor’s illegal double-spend activity. This has become standard practice for exchanges when they receive notice of coin addresses that have been involved in thefts, hacks or other illegal activities. Some exchanges may elect to take additional protective measures at their discretion.
Blockchains cannot themselves prevent bad actors. But by working together with exchanges, miners, transaction processors and other industry participants, collectively we can facilitate a safe and trusted environment for users of the Bitcoin SV network. There have been prior attacks on other blockchains, and it is time that industry participants demonstrate that such attacks are in fact illegal – just as attacks against other financial systems are illegal – and will be met with legal enforcement action. The Association will continue to maintain a zero-tolerance stance for illegal activity on the Bitcoin SV network and will respond to all malicious actors and activities accordingly.
Details for all inquiries, including anyone who may have been affected by the illegal attacks, is below.
https://bitcoinassociation.net/bitcoin-association-statement-zero-tolerance-for-illegal-attacks-on-the-bitcoin-sv-network
No need to look at scams, Elon Musk
it is solved
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1413396249546563586
Just with plain Bitcoin - industrial scaled
it is solved
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1413396249546563586
Just with plain Bitcoin - industrial scaled
https://bitcoinassociation.net/bitcoin-association-statement-zero-tolerance-for-illegal-attacks-on-the-bitcoin-sv-network/
There seam to go attacks to btc, bch and real bitcoin
But most transparent one : real bitcoin (BSV) so better know you get caught and sued
Ïan Grigg on the show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJYA_Z_fYA8
Ricardian Contracts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardian_contract
Triple Entry Accounting
eGold
eCash
Nick Szabo
and
https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2018/08/21/a-tale-of-two-elliptic-curves/
and ID ( pepared with R3 - where Mike Hearn went to after governance issues in btc core )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_f93QL0xLc
and compliance and costs for
... common liability ?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJYA_Z_fYA8
Ricardian Contracts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardian_contract
Quote
A Ricardian contract can be defined as a single document that is[1]
a) a contract offered by an issuer to holders,
b) for a valuable right held by holders, and managed by the issuer,
c) easily readable (like a contract on paper),
d) readable by programs (parsable like a database),
e) digitally signed,
f) carrying the keys and server information, and
g) allied with a unique and secure identifier
a) a contract offered by an issuer to holders,
b) for a valuable right held by holders, and managed by the issuer,
c) easily readable (like a contract on paper),
d) readable by programs (parsable like a database),
e) digitally signed,
f) carrying the keys and server information, and
g) allied with a unique and secure identifier
Triple Entry Accounting
eGold
eCash
Nick Szabo
and
https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2018/08/21/a-tale-of-two-elliptic-curves/
and ID ( pepared with R3 - where Mike Hearn went to after governance issues in btc core )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_f93QL0xLc
and compliance and costs for
... common liability ?
...
The fun is: Bitcoin, clean and original version, is not a forked off crypto hobby conensnus thingy, not want to hide and allows anonymity
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/bitcoin-btc-unsuitable-professional-investors-regulation-china-binance-ubs-2021-7
so after the professional conensus clears that,
what will stay and just work like a Swiss UBS - ah clock?
meh
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/bitcoin-btc-unsuitable-professional-investors-regulation-china-binance-ubs-2021-7
so after the professional conensus clears that,
what will stay and just work like a Swiss UBS - ah clock?
meh
Its a commodity, yes but only the stable protocol
https://old.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/odf0yo/bitcoin_is_a_commodity/
Any change is not, not even BitCoin
https://old.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/odf0yo/bitcoin_is_a_commodity/
Any change is not, not even BitCoin
I'm curious. How does it feel to not only be out of the top 10 coins in a big way, but, also ranking behind a shitcoin like Shiba Inu? I'm genuinely curious.
Firstly, white paper is ours. Now BSV will rises up at ranking. Bitcoin.org has no whitepaper anymore. And I highly doubt the dominance of BTC in the future. Secondly, the rankings of CMC are not the same now as in the past and fully managed by CZ. It is he who draws rankings that do not correspond to reality.I mean, particularly when the free market keeps Bitcoin in the number one position and has outperformed your coin in a massive way.
BTC is fully manipulated market. Where did you see the free market at BTC ecosystem? It is precisely due to such hamsters like you that these bubbles like ridiculous Shiba Inu grows
Bitcoin SV - undervalued
BTC - overvalued
Shiba Inu - overvalued
Dogecoin - overvalued
Now investors have nowhere to invest other than in undervalued assets. Most of the top assets are already overvalued, the market overheated with them.
To the BSV bagholders.
I'm curious. How does it feel to not only be out of the top 10 coins in a big way, but, also ranking behind a shitcoin like Shiba Inu? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, particularly when the free market keeps Bitcoin in the number one position and has outperformed your coin in a massive way.
I'm curious. How does it feel to not only be out of the top 10 coins in a big way, but, also ranking behind a shitcoin like Shiba Inu? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, particularly when the free market keeps Bitcoin in the number one position and has outperformed your coin in a massive way.
Craig Wright is winner! Greatest man, visioner & scientist.
CSW has never presented any evidence of being Satoshi.
Cøbra confirms that white paper of BTC does not belong to him. Until that time Cøbra was fooling you all this time pretending to be the wrong one
Quote
The whitepaper is in the blockchain and can be retrieved through the software. I'm not allowed to distribute the whitepaper on http://bitcoin.org, or "in any other way". We have to follow the law.
https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1410889281904709634 Jump to: