Richard Hein is a fraud, just like Craig.
Craig is satoshi, that annoys you and that's good. The fraud here is BTC, the
cartel that took it over with the updated SegWit and the name of the Bitcoin they stole, compare the source codes to see.
Here's how Bitcoin has evolved since 2008
> Creation 2008 = XBT (Original ticker name) Turing complete Ok. 2010 Satoshi takes a personal step back.
> Update 2017 = BTC (SegWit increment = modify source code, unlocked protocol, limited, fee modified, just steal Bitcoin name). No Ecosystem except LN which doesn't enter data in the ledger when leaving channels (transfers) open. Not Turing. Not evolving as is.
> Update 2017 (bis) = BCH = Refusing SegWit (Unlocked protocol + Modified source code + Proven Oligarchy + Remains limited). But closest to XBT until 2018 compared to BTC. No Ecosystem. Not Turing. Not evolving as is.
> Update 2018 > BSV (Locked protocol + Cleaned source code + No SegWit + unlimited + full opening of Bitcoin potential). BSV is certainly Bitcoin, like XBT, but with the potential released as well as its locked protocol = evolving as is, that's why the ecosystem is perennial because it is stable and healthy, with already hundreds of applications redistributing the economic and technological models accessible to all. Complete Turing Ok.
Now that all the morons buy BTC and Hodl without being able to use, get screwed on the fees that fill the pockets of the BTC cartel then the only logical alternative because these cartels (and partners) accumulate so many BTCs will be to create a BTC upgrade fork to multiply the buns. This is the same model that has happened several times in the past and the only possible continuity for their Hodl Ponzi shema. Will they use the word Bitcoin with affrons > yes for sure or not, this is also why Satoshi defends his legacy. The copyright is not to make the white paper disappear, on the contrary, so many bots are turning your head and making you believe that BTC is Bitcoin and its BTC potential is Bitcoin but is clearly a deception! it's a big deal to be fooled by BTC aficionados and BTC social speakers who don't do any code introspection, research, proof or even try to understand, others will bite you with venom.
Compare the source codes 👑 so you can understand with your own eyes.
Original XBT is now no longer available (After 2010 BTC Core have control on the sourcecode. Maybe Core control "erased it"?)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin (BTC Core have control on the sourcecode)
https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc (BCH)
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv (BSV)
Also note that the keys were modified by Core control all this is in the highlights worn by Coingeek to help you open your eyes to this painted canvas to make you accept that BTC is Bitcoin.
https://coingeek.com/news/tag/crypto-crime-cartelUnderstand that the economic context is the stakes are colossal for the BTC cartel even their personal financial interests advocates priority compared to the technological advances and the original essence of what Bitcoin is. It seems that BTC is controlled by
Blockstream and has no locked protocol, so it is centralized.
If you are truly passionate with the Bitcoin soul then you might understand what Bitcoin really means? I encourage you to do your own research and preserve yourself from BTC bots.
Keep this in mind:
One would have to be stupid not to understand this and miss the potential Bitcoin liberated.
Yes: Keep any code as clean, simple as possible: better to maintain, scale or deep risk assess
and most important: Keep it to what the specs / legal terms are defining it, or copyrights / law enforcments / wrong product selling class actions are coming - as everywhere