Topic: [ANN] Bytecoin|BTE| Official Re-Launch of this 1:1 Bitcoin Coin! - page 4. (Read 23581 times)
September 30, 2013, 04:56:52 AM
Article about the resurface of a ByteCoin Pool : http://majesti.co/cryptonerd/bytecoin-resurfaces-new-mining-pool/
September 30, 2013, 04:56:01 AM
i hope not. but atleast it gives us something to compare with for the merged mining patch
September 30, 2013, 02:36:37 AM
Difficulty will be shooting up x4 soon. Will the miners drop it again afterwards?
September 30, 2013, 02:04:10 AM
Tried solomining with 11ghs, Win 7- 6 hours returned nothing.
with 2-3 blocks per minute there will be high stale ratio
September 29, 2013, 08:53:34 PM
Tried solomining with 11ghs, Win 7- 6 hours returned nothing.
September 29, 2013, 01:32:05 PM
Hello,
I've compiled Bytecoind client for x64 linux:
http://p2pool.beehost.org/clients/bytecoind.tar.gz
and set a p2pool for bytecoind:
http://p2pool.beehost.org:9743/static/
Cheers
r50zyry5
I've compiled Bytecoind client for x64 linux:
http://p2pool.beehost.org/clients/bytecoind.tar.gz
and set a p2pool for bytecoind:
http://p2pool.beehost.org:9743/static/
Cheers
r50zyry5
the effiency of that pool is shoking 67% dead shares
Yes, it becouse i plug 10 blades into ;]
Now i dixconnect this 10 BLADES plug only 60 Block Erupter USB and all back to normal
Cheers
r50zyry5
September 29, 2013, 12:05:09 PM
Hello,
I've compiled Bytecoind client for x64 linux:
http://p2pool.beehost.org/clients/bytecoind.tar.gz
and set a p2pool for bytecoind:
http://p2pool.beehost.org:9743/static/
Cheers
r50zyry5
I've compiled Bytecoind client for x64 linux:
http://p2pool.beehost.org/clients/bytecoind.tar.gz
and set a p2pool for bytecoind:
http://p2pool.beehost.org:9743/static/
Cheers
r50zyry5
the effiency of that pool is shoking 67% dead shares
September 29, 2013, 11:28:02 AM
Hello,
I've compiled Bytecoind client for x64 linux:
http://p2pool.beehost.org/clients/bytecoind.tar.gz
and set a p2pool for bytecoind:
http://p2pool.beehost.org:9743/static/
Cheers
r50zyry5
I've compiled Bytecoind client for x64 linux:
http://p2pool.beehost.org/clients/bytecoind.tar.gz
and set a p2pool for bytecoind:
http://p2pool.beehost.org:9743/static/
Cheers
r50zyry5
September 29, 2013, 06:34:47 AM
upgrade and checkpoint of current source
September 29, 2013, 04:21:10 AM
The new source will be a fork or just an upgrade of the current?!
September 29, 2013, 04:14:23 AM
Parking myself here so I know when the new source is out. Just downloaded, compiled, and synced.
September 28, 2013, 07:44:42 PM
releasing the source to the new client soon will get binaries asap
September 28, 2013, 07:41:55 PM
use bte.crypto-expert.com
Up and mining, still can get the wallet to sync September 28, 2013, 07:36:01 PM
use bte.crypto-expert.com
September 28, 2013, 07:18:45 PM
crypto-expert.com is broken
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at 75.156.209.173 Port 7200
September 28, 2013, 07:03:11 PM
11 blocks found so far. i will have to warn you guys that the links on dsync are likely to be outdated with the official dev repo. so that is likely to be a reason as to why everyone cannot sync. ill post a link to my repo in a minute or so
September 28, 2013, 06:56:44 PM
yep hashrate isnt correct
September 28, 2013, 06:01:48 PM
i'm all for leaving it not merge mined. I think the coin's got great potential like it is.
I take it the pool isn't showing correct hash rates at the moment? Mine definitely report much lower than they are.
Cheers
I take it the pool isn't showing correct hash rates at the moment? Mine definitely report much lower than they are.
Cheers
September 28, 2013, 05:51:49 PM
There is also bte.dsync.net which I am running on. The pool is just over 300GH right now and climbing.
bte.dsync.net:4444
bte.dsync.net:4444
September 28, 2013, 05:38:04 PM
Definitly were on our third or forth block I think. At this rate well fly through these blocks and bring bytecoin back to profitability. I've had a rethink on the merged mining and changed my mind. Decided to wait for the diff derop see how the network goes and only implement merged mining if neccesary
Jump to: