well done I was out of update about this, I'm holding some ks Click so hope the takeover will succeed
good luck
Nice to see you here Splatters. Good luck to you too. good luck
Topic: [ANN] [CLICK] Clickcoin | POS | Controlled Inflation | Nov.13 MANDATORY UPDATE! - page 4. (Read 6635 times)
October 30, 2015, 06:55:38 PM
October 30, 2015, 02:39:34 PM
Great to see that Clickcoin is back live. First step should be to bring to coin to more exchanges beside Yobit.
October 30, 2015, 02:34:29 PM
well done I was out of update about this, I'm holding some ks Click so hope the takeover will succeed
good luck
good luck
October 29, 2015, 03:10:37 AM
Nice movements at yobit after the takeover. 
Well, two major things changed for Clickcoin already:
- we have a great skilled dev with nice track records (Truckcoin, Version)
- wallet has way better coin control now: with splitthreshold / splitblock it’s way easier to manage your staking
… and that’s just the start ;-)
It's up to everybody to do the math: coins in circulation x price = market cap vs. market cap of similar coins (TRK, CAP, XRA, HYP, TEK, HBN...)
October 29, 2015, 02:42:06 AM
Nice movements at yobit after the takeover.
October 28, 2015, 04:11:07 AM
problem with HIVE was bigger: wallet showed no virus in virustotal!
It was probably encrypted and decrypted right after you started using it. Also antivirus (like AVAST) showed nothing. Only Malwarebytes detected it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-of-increasingly-sophisticated-malware-infection-attempts-936724
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
It was probably encrypted and decrypted right after you started using it. Also antivirus (like AVAST) showed nothing. Only Malwarebytes detected it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-of-increasingly-sophisticated-malware-infection-attempts-936724
HIVE (hmm, forum deleted... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1194096,) was a nasty shit.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
oh i see... well is true that we talked of virus and not malware but i think that another thing could be done of the source code was made public, or in the case of hive it didn't happened? and there are even things called sandbox and virtual machines to test a wallet on which somebody could have some suspects that are viruses or malwares
You're definitely right about sandboxes and virtual machines, one can never be careful enough.
October 28, 2015, 04:04:52 AM
problem with HIVE was bigger: wallet showed no virus in virustotal!
It was probably encrypted and decrypted right after you started using it. Also antivirus (like AVAST) showed nothing. Only Malwarebytes detected it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-of-increasingly-sophisticated-malware-infection-attempts-936724
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
It was probably encrypted and decrypted right after you started using it. Also antivirus (like AVAST) showed nothing. Only Malwarebytes detected it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-of-increasingly-sophisticated-malware-infection-attempts-936724
HIVE (hmm, forum deleted... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1194096,) was a nasty shit.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
oh i see... well is true that we talked of virus and not malware but i think that another thing could be done of the source code was made public, or in the case of hive it didn't happened? and there are even things called sandbox and virtual machines to test a wallet on which somebody could have some suspects that are viruses or malwares
October 28, 2015, 03:44:57 AM
problem with HIVE was bigger: wallet showed no virus in virustotal!
It was probably encrypted and decrypted right after you started using it. Also antivirus (like AVAST) showed nothing. Only Malwarebytes detected it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-of-increasingly-sophisticated-malware-infection-attempts-936724
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
It was probably encrypted and decrypted right after you started using it. Also antivirus (like AVAST) showed nothing. Only Malwarebytes detected it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beware-of-increasingly-sophisticated-malware-infection-attempts-936724
HIVE (hmm, forum deleted... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1194096,) was a nasty shit.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
October 28, 2015, 03:28:27 AM
HIVE (hmm, forum deleted... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1194096,) was a nasty shit.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
the problem with this fact you are telling now is because people doesn't send the file to online antiviruses scanners to see if it had something that can be considered as a malware or not and posting the results on the thread of that specific coin (if the thread posting the wallet is self-modered it means directly that the whole thing was made with the intention of harming users)
October 28, 2015, 03:19:39 AM
HIVE (hmm, forum deleted... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1194096,) was a nasty shit.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
People reported coins stolen from exchanges as malware was remotely controlling their PC
Definitely there should be barriers for newbie accounts.
I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
October 28, 2015, 03:14:24 AM
Good to see the coin is with the right Dev.
Well on the past weeks there were tons of new coins and of course some of them doesn't survive even 2 months, if you go to see bit1 thread about the coin launched last month you will see that almost all of them are being considered dead
Exactly. I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
well you're right, if there will be a change to the rules that blocks newbies to creating threads in the accouncement sub-forum all the scam/malware coins will disappear but at the same time i think that the making of new altcoins will require more time and because of that added time the coins will be considered all premined
October 28, 2015, 03:08:58 AM
Good to see the coin is with the right Dev.
Well on the past weeks there were tons of new coins and of course some of them doesn't survive even 2 months, if you go to see bit1 thread about the coin launched last month you will see that almost all of them are being considered dead
Exactly. I have even seen coins with malware in wallets...Unless there is a rule to stop newbie's creating threads with wallet announcements, the saga continues...
October 28, 2015, 02:58:54 AM
Good to see the coin is with the right Dev.
Well on the past weeks there were tons of new coins and of course some of them doesn't survive even 2 months, if you go to see bit1 thread about the coin launched last month you will see that almost all of them are being considered dead
October 27, 2015, 09:49:28 PM
c81P34RRjGEEbweXYAEPJjR1St94Z6am86= 245126.14 Clicks(№1 in Richlist)
- these are mktg. funds we sent to old dev
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12282023
c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist)
- not sure about this one, might be Yobit though
c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist)- these are mktg. funds we sent to old dev
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12282023
c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist)
- not sure about this one, might be Yobit though
I see from Block Explorer that c81P34RRjGEEbweXYAEPJjR1St94Z6am86= 245126.14 Clicks(№1 in Richlist) and c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist) not changing their amounts of coins long time,so that adresses not staking all that time. How i think one of them its a Yobit Exchange adress but i can do a mistake here anyway they both have a funds more than 10% of total coins(exactly more than 15%). For what im start to talk about that,because its would be much more than positive for new investors to know much more information about adresses which have a huge amounts of CLicks on balances and can dump Click on exchanges.
- not sure about this one, might be Yobit though
Its not changing too long time. So its cannot be Yobit exchange. Im now specially send some Clicks to Yobit but amount on that adress not change after that. Anyway ty for your answers
October 27, 2015, 09:41:57 PM
Hi, well, this is unfortunate, I've send him 150k, still feel pissed off... Don't know how to compensate it though... 
I was one of those that donated Clicks... 50K to be exact... are there any plans to compensate those that were ripped off and keep the Old Dev from cashing in on the New Community?
October 27, 2015, 09:34:42 PM
c81P34RRjGEEbweXYAEPJjR1St94Z6am86= 245126.14 Clicks(№1 in Richlist)
- these are mktg. funds we sent to old dev
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12282023
c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist)
- not sure about this one, might be Yobit though
- these are mktg. funds we sent to old dev
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12282023
c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist)
- not sure about this one, might be Yobit though
I see from Block Explorer that c81P34RRjGEEbweXYAEPJjR1St94Z6am86= 245126.14 Clicks(№1 in Richlist) and c8xtGJjiJTHsaSEh9r8JyjzyK99gdaFYD=102403.06(№3 in Richlist) not changing their amounts of coins long time,so that adresses not staking all that time. How i think one of them its a Yobit Exchange adress but i can do a mistake here anyway they both have a funds more than 10% of total coins(exactly more than 15%). For what im start to talk about that,because its would be much more than positive for new investors to know much more information about adresses which have a huge amounts of CLicks on balances and can dump Click on exchanges.
October 27, 2015, 09:18:42 PM
Hi guys,
as for the real amount of coins / money supply:
Block explorer shows supply with burned coins 3 042 670
- burned after ICO 774 840
-----------------
total = real amount = shows in Wallet v1.1.0.1 2 267 829
Don't forget use updated wallet:
Windows v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-win.zip
ClickCoin wallet v1.1.0.1 changelog summary:
---------------------------------------
- New GUI layout and style
- getinfo RPC shows the actual moneysupply with burned coins already subtracted
- New checkpoints and alert pubkeys
- Add splitthreshold
- Add splitblock
- Enable IRC peer discovery
- Add hardened checkpoint at 40200
- Many other fixes and improvements to the code
info about burned coins:
https://twitter.com/YobitExchange/status/635805526882951169
as for the real amount of coins / money supply:
Block explorer shows supply with burned coins 3 042 670
- burned after ICO 774 840
-----------------
total = real amount = shows in Wallet v1.1.0.1 2 267 829
Don't forget use updated wallet:
Windows v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-win.zip
ClickCoin wallet v1.1.0.1 changelog summary:
---------------------------------------
- New GUI layout and style
- getinfo RPC shows the actual moneysupply with burned coins already subtracted
- New checkpoints and alert pubkeys
- Add splitthreshold
- Add splitblock
- Enable IRC peer discovery
- Add hardened checkpoint at 40200
- Many other fixes and improvements to the code
info about burned coins:
https://twitter.com/YobitExchange/status/635805526882951169
Can we now calculate a real amount of coins here?
October 27, 2015, 05:50:57 PM
I was one of those that donated Clicks... 50K to be exact... are there any plans to compensate those that were ripped off and keep the Old Dev from cashing in on the New Community?
October 27, 2015, 05:30:14 PM
ClickCoin wallet v1.1.0.1 changelog summary:
---------------------------------------
- New GUI layout and style
- getinfo RPC shows the actual moneysupply with burned coins already subtracted
- New checkpoints and alert pubkeys
- Add splitthreshold
- Add splitblock
- Enable IRC peer discovery
- Add hardened checkpoint at 40200
- Many other fixes and improvements to the code
Download:
------------
Windows v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-win.zip
Raspberry Pi v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-arm-pi.tar.gz
Linux Ubuntu x64 14.04 v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-ubuntu-x64.tar.gz
Source: https://github.com/noise23/ClickCoin
---------------------------------------
- New GUI layout and style
- getinfo RPC shows the actual moneysupply with burned coins already subtracted
- New checkpoints and alert pubkeys
- Add splitthreshold
- Add splitblock
- Enable IRC peer discovery
- Add hardened checkpoint at 40200
- Many other fixes and improvements to the code
Download:
------------
Windows v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-win.zip
Raspberry Pi v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-arm-pi.tar.gz
Linux Ubuntu x64 14.04 v1.1.0.1: http://clickcoin.click/dl/clickcoin-qt-v1.1.0.1-ubuntu-x64.tar.gz
Source: https://github.com/noise23/ClickCoin
October 27, 2015, 04:50:09 PM
I have the new wallet. That would be why. Burn address balance already subtracted from money supply must be.
$ ClickCoind getinfo
{
"version" : "v1.1.0.1",
"protocolversion" : 75000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 100.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 45430,
"timeoffset" : -3,
"moneysupply" : 2266449.84805186,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "xxxxxxx",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00898845,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.38626344
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1445970866,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00001000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
That said, supply is currently 2,266,449
My walllet version not update. Time to do that. Ty $ ClickCoind getinfo
{
"version" : "v1.1.0.1",
"protocolversion" : 75000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 100.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 45430,
"timeoffset" : -3,
"moneysupply" : 2266449.84805186,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "xxxxxxx",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00898845,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.38626344
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1445970866,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00001000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
That said, supply is currently 2,266,449
Jump to: